教育采用数字化转型的决定因素:对越南大流行后案例研究的评估

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Huong Thi Pham
{"title":"教育采用数字化转型的决定因素:对越南大流行后案例研究的评估","authors":"Huong Thi Pham","doi":"10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, digital transformation (DT) has emerged as a subject with numerous promise advantages across several industries. Prior papers focused mostly on identifying benefits and obstacles, but less is known about validation, particularly in the educational sector. Thus, the objective of this study is to fill the gap by examining the factors that influence the acceptance of digital transformation in the education setting. 318 prospective adopters of DT consented to participate in this research by completing an online survey through Google Form. These samples were divided into 159 individuals for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 159 observations for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA favored a five-factor model, which was shown to explain over 69% of the data variance. The tentative names for these hidden variables were policy, efficiency, knowledge, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention. Two items were excluded from the scale measurement due to cross-loading on other factors. The findings of the CFA confirmed and validated the five-factor model, with all test measures meeting the predefined thresholds, indicating an acceptable fit. As opposed to evaluating individual indicators, the findings of this study present five crucial topics for instructors, educators, and policymakers to examine, and they also provide a foundation for interested researchers to perform further studies.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Digital Transformation Adoption in Education: An Evaluation of a Post-pandemic Case Study in Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Huong Thi Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, digital transformation (DT) has emerged as a subject with numerous promise advantages across several industries. Prior papers focused mostly on identifying benefits and obstacles, but less is known about validation, particularly in the educational sector. Thus, the objective of this study is to fill the gap by examining the factors that influence the acceptance of digital transformation in the education setting. 318 prospective adopters of DT consented to participate in this research by completing an online survey through Google Form. These samples were divided into 159 individuals for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 159 observations for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA favored a five-factor model, which was shown to explain over 69% of the data variance. The tentative names for these hidden variables were policy, efficiency, knowledge, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention. Two items were excluded from the scale measurement due to cross-loading on other factors. The findings of the CFA confirmed and validated the five-factor model, with all test measures meeting the predefined thresholds, indicating an acceptable fit. As opposed to evaluating individual indicators, the findings of this study present five crucial topics for instructors, educators, and policymakers to examine, and they also provide a foundation for interested researchers to perform further studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.044\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,数字化转型(DT)已经成为一个横跨多个行业的具有众多前景优势的主题。先前的论文主要集中在确定收益和障碍,但对验证的了解较少,特别是在教育部门。因此,本研究的目的是通过研究影响教育环境中接受数字化转型的因素来填补这一空白。318名准DT采用者通过谷歌表格完成在线调查,同意参与本研究。这些样本分为159个个体进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和159个观察值进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。EFA倾向于一个五因素模型,该模型被证明可以解释超过69%的数据差异。这些隐藏变量的暂定名称是政策、效率、知识、便利条件和行为意图。由于其他因素的交叉加载,有两个项目被排除在量表测量之外。CFA的结果证实并验证了五因素模型,所有测试措施都符合预定义的阈值,表明可接受的拟合。与评估单个指标相反,本研究的发现为教师、教育工作者和政策制定者提出了五个关键主题,并为感兴趣的研究人员进行进一步研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of Digital Transformation Adoption in Education: An Evaluation of a Post-pandemic Case Study in Vietnam
In recent years, digital transformation (DT) has emerged as a subject with numerous promise advantages across several industries. Prior papers focused mostly on identifying benefits and obstacles, but less is known about validation, particularly in the educational sector. Thus, the objective of this study is to fill the gap by examining the factors that influence the acceptance of digital transformation in the education setting. 318 prospective adopters of DT consented to participate in this research by completing an online survey through Google Form. These samples were divided into 159 individuals for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 159 observations for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA favored a five-factor model, which was shown to explain over 69% of the data variance. The tentative names for these hidden variables were policy, efficiency, knowledge, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention. Two items were excluded from the scale measurement due to cross-loading on other factors. The findings of the CFA confirmed and validated the five-factor model, with all test measures meeting the predefined thresholds, indicating an acceptable fit. As opposed to evaluating individual indicators, the findings of this study present five crucial topics for instructors, educators, and policymakers to examine, and they also provide a foundation for interested researchers to perform further studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信