中低收入国家受伤后与健康相关的生活质量

I. Wainiqolo, B. Kool, V. Nosa, S. Ameratunga
{"title":"中低收入国家受伤后与健康相关的生活质量","authors":"I. Wainiqolo, B. Kool, V. Nosa, S. Ameratunga","doi":"10.26635/PHD.2019.606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:  Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important aspect to consider when assessing the non-fatal impact of injuries.  The aim of this review was to critically appraise the range of generic instruments employed in the assessment of HRQoL following injury in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). As a prelude to subsequent research examining longer-term outcomes following motor vehicle crash injuries in Fiji, we also examined how commonly used measures align with the List of All Deficits (LOAD) framework for injury and the Fonofale model of Pacific health and well-being.  \nMethods:  A systematic search of four databases was conducted to identify injury outcome studies undertaken in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) that used a generic health status outcome measure(s).  Two separate content analyses were undertaken, to assess how identified HRQoL measures aligned with the LOAD framework and the Fonofale model. \nFindings:  Thirty two studies from thirteen LMICs examined variably defined aspects of HRQoL following a range of traumatic injuries (e.g. spinal cord, brain). The measures most commonly focused on the ‘impact on individual’ aspect of the LOAD framework and the ‘physical and mental’ aspects of the Fonofale model.  While the emerging literature from LMICs provides valuable information about the HRQoL of trauma patients, the commonly used generic measures provided limited insights regarding societal impacts, culture and spirituality, domains of relevance to injury research and Pacific health and well-being.  \nConclusion: Theoretical frameworks relevant to Pacific contexts should be considered when selecting appropriate outcome measures for injury studies in the region.","PeriodicalId":82251,"journal":{"name":"Pacific health dialog","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health related quality of life following injury in low-and middle-income countries\",\"authors\":\"I. Wainiqolo, B. Kool, V. Nosa, S. Ameratunga\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/PHD.2019.606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction:  Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important aspect to consider when assessing the non-fatal impact of injuries.  The aim of this review was to critically appraise the range of generic instruments employed in the assessment of HRQoL following injury in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). As a prelude to subsequent research examining longer-term outcomes following motor vehicle crash injuries in Fiji, we also examined how commonly used measures align with the List of All Deficits (LOAD) framework for injury and the Fonofale model of Pacific health and well-being.  \\nMethods:  A systematic search of four databases was conducted to identify injury outcome studies undertaken in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) that used a generic health status outcome measure(s).  Two separate content analyses were undertaken, to assess how identified HRQoL measures aligned with the LOAD framework and the Fonofale model. \\nFindings:  Thirty two studies from thirteen LMICs examined variably defined aspects of HRQoL following a range of traumatic injuries (e.g. spinal cord, brain). The measures most commonly focused on the ‘impact on individual’ aspect of the LOAD framework and the ‘physical and mental’ aspects of the Fonofale model.  While the emerging literature from LMICs provides valuable information about the HRQoL of trauma patients, the commonly used generic measures provided limited insights regarding societal impacts, culture and spirituality, domains of relevance to injury research and Pacific health and well-being.  \\nConclusion: Theoretical frameworks relevant to Pacific contexts should be considered when selecting appropriate outcome measures for injury studies in the region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific health dialog\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific health dialog\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/PHD.2019.606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific health dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/PHD.2019.606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)是评估损伤非致命性影响时要考虑的一个重要方面。本综述的目的是批判性地评价中低收入国家(LMICs)损伤后HRQoL评估中使用的通用仪器的范围。作为后续研究斐济机动车碰撞伤害后长期结果的前奏,我们还研究了常用措施如何与所有缺陷清单(LOAD)伤害框架和太平洋健康和福祉的Fonofale模型相一致。方法:对四个数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)进行的使用通用健康状况结果测量的损伤结果研究。进行了两项单独的内容分析,以评估确定的HRQoL措施如何与LOAD框架和Fonofale模型相一致。结果:来自13个低收入国家的32项研究检查了一系列创伤性损伤(如脊髓、脑)后HRQoL的可变定义方面。这些措施通常集中在LOAD框架的“对个人的影响”方面和Fonofale模型的“身体和精神”方面。虽然来自中低收入国家的新兴文献提供了关于创伤患者HRQoL的宝贵信息,但常用的通用测量方法对社会影响、文化和精神、与伤害研究和太平洋健康和福祉相关的领域提供的见解有限。结论:在为该地区的伤害研究选择适当的结果测量时,应考虑与太平洋地区背景相关的理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health related quality of life following injury in low-and middle-income countries
Introduction:  Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important aspect to consider when assessing the non-fatal impact of injuries.  The aim of this review was to critically appraise the range of generic instruments employed in the assessment of HRQoL following injury in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). As a prelude to subsequent research examining longer-term outcomes following motor vehicle crash injuries in Fiji, we also examined how commonly used measures align with the List of All Deficits (LOAD) framework for injury and the Fonofale model of Pacific health and well-being.  Methods:  A systematic search of four databases was conducted to identify injury outcome studies undertaken in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) that used a generic health status outcome measure(s).  Two separate content analyses were undertaken, to assess how identified HRQoL measures aligned with the LOAD framework and the Fonofale model. Findings:  Thirty two studies from thirteen LMICs examined variably defined aspects of HRQoL following a range of traumatic injuries (e.g. spinal cord, brain). The measures most commonly focused on the ‘impact on individual’ aspect of the LOAD framework and the ‘physical and mental’ aspects of the Fonofale model.  While the emerging literature from LMICs provides valuable information about the HRQoL of trauma patients, the commonly used generic measures provided limited insights regarding societal impacts, culture and spirituality, domains of relevance to injury research and Pacific health and well-being.  Conclusion: Theoretical frameworks relevant to Pacific contexts should be considered when selecting appropriate outcome measures for injury studies in the region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信