在新加坡一家专科妇产医院,患者控制的瑞芬太尼静脉镇痛用于分娩镇痛的满意度和结果:一项回顾性观察性研究

Q4 Nursing
Pruthvidher Muddangula, H. Tan, C. Tan, W. Leong, R. Sultana, B. Sng
{"title":"在新加坡一家专科妇产医院,患者控制的瑞芬太尼静脉镇痛用于分娩镇痛的满意度和结果:一项回顾性观察性研究","authors":"Pruthvidher Muddangula, H. Tan, C. Tan, W. Leong, R. Sultana, B. Sng","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_52_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) remifentanil is being increasingly adopted for labor analgesia despite efficacy and safety concerns. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe factors associated with high versus low parturient satisfaction, adverse effects, and parturient and neonatal outcomes in a specialist maternity hospital in Singapore. Materials and Methods: Database review of patients who received PCIA remifentanil for labor analgesia between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Parturient and clinical characteristics, adverse events, parturient and neonatal outcomes, satisfaction, PCIA remifentanil settings, and usage characteristics were analyzed. Results: There were 177 parturients who received PCIA remifentanil during the study period, with a trend of increasing utilization. After excluding 31 parturients, 146 were analyzed, of whom 99 (67.8%) reported satisfaction scores of ≥80 out of 100, with a mean ± standard deviation of 89.5 ± 8.9. Univariate analysis showed that higher pain scores at delivery was associated with low satisfaction scores (unadjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence intervals 1.02–1.88). None of the parturients or neonates required ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) was observed in 10.3% of parturients (n = 15), all of which were self-limiting. Conclusion: PCIA remifentanil for labor analgesia resulted in high satisfaction with no severe adverse events. Standardized protocols for PCIA settings and close monitoring may improve parturient and fetal safety. Future research should focus on improving the analgesic efficacy of PCIA remifentanil and monitoring practices to reduce the risk of severe adverse events.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satisfaction and outcomes with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of remifentanil for labor analgesia at a specialist maternity hospital in Singapore: A retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Pruthvidher Muddangula, H. Tan, C. Tan, W. Leong, R. Sultana, B. Sng\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_52_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) remifentanil is being increasingly adopted for labor analgesia despite efficacy and safety concerns. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe factors associated with high versus low parturient satisfaction, adverse effects, and parturient and neonatal outcomes in a specialist maternity hospital in Singapore. Materials and Methods: Database review of patients who received PCIA remifentanil for labor analgesia between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Parturient and clinical characteristics, adverse events, parturient and neonatal outcomes, satisfaction, PCIA remifentanil settings, and usage characteristics were analyzed. Results: There were 177 parturients who received PCIA remifentanil during the study period, with a trend of increasing utilization. After excluding 31 parturients, 146 were analyzed, of whom 99 (67.8%) reported satisfaction scores of ≥80 out of 100, with a mean ± standard deviation of 89.5 ± 8.9. Univariate analysis showed that higher pain scores at delivery was associated with low satisfaction scores (unadjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence intervals 1.02–1.88). None of the parturients or neonates required ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) was observed in 10.3% of parturients (n = 15), all of which were self-limiting. Conclusion: PCIA remifentanil for labor analgesia resulted in high satisfaction with no severe adverse events. Standardized protocols for PCIA settings and close monitoring may improve parturient and fetal safety. Future research should focus on improving the analgesic efficacy of PCIA remifentanil and monitoring practices to reduce the risk of severe adverse events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_52_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_52_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管存在有效性和安全性方面的担忧,但病人自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)瑞芬太尼越来越多地被用于分娩镇痛。本回顾性观察性研究旨在描述新加坡一家专科妇产医院中与高与低产妇满意度、不良反应以及产妇和新生儿结局相关的因素。材料与方法:回顾性分析2014年至2020年PCIA瑞芬太尼分娩镇痛患者的数据库。分析了产妇和临床特点、不良事件、产妇和新生儿结局、满意度、PCIA瑞芬太尼设置和使用特点。结果:研究期间接受PCIA瑞芬太尼治疗的产妇177例,使用率呈上升趋势。排除31例产妇后,共分析146例,其中满意度≥80分的有99例(67.8%),平均±标准差为89.5±8.9。单因素分析显示,分娩时较高的疼痛评分与较低的满意度评分相关(未经调整的优势比1.39,95%可信区间1.02-1.88)。所有的产妇和新生儿都不需要呼吸机或心肺复苏。10.3%的产妇(n = 15)出现氧饱和度(SpO2 < 95%),均为自限性。结论:瑞芬太尼用于PCIA产程镇痛效果满意,无严重不良反应。PCIA设置的标准化协议和密切监测可以提高产妇和胎儿的安全。未来的研究应侧重于提高PCIA瑞芬太尼的镇痛效果和监测措施,以降低严重不良事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Satisfaction and outcomes with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of remifentanil for labor analgesia at a specialist maternity hospital in Singapore: A retrospective observational study
Background: Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) remifentanil is being increasingly adopted for labor analgesia despite efficacy and safety concerns. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe factors associated with high versus low parturient satisfaction, adverse effects, and parturient and neonatal outcomes in a specialist maternity hospital in Singapore. Materials and Methods: Database review of patients who received PCIA remifentanil for labor analgesia between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Parturient and clinical characteristics, adverse events, parturient and neonatal outcomes, satisfaction, PCIA remifentanil settings, and usage characteristics were analyzed. Results: There were 177 parturients who received PCIA remifentanil during the study period, with a trend of increasing utilization. After excluding 31 parturients, 146 were analyzed, of whom 99 (67.8%) reported satisfaction scores of ≥80 out of 100, with a mean ± standard deviation of 89.5 ± 8.9. Univariate analysis showed that higher pain scores at delivery was associated with low satisfaction scores (unadjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence intervals 1.02–1.88). None of the parturients or neonates required ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) was observed in 10.3% of parturients (n = 15), all of which were self-limiting. Conclusion: PCIA remifentanil for labor analgesia resulted in high satisfaction with no severe adverse events. Standardized protocols for PCIA settings and close monitoring may improve parturient and fetal safety. Future research should focus on improving the analgesic efficacy of PCIA remifentanil and monitoring practices to reduce the risk of severe adverse events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信