{"title":"亲生物设计会成为另一个清单吗?","authors":"T. Haidamous","doi":"10.2495/sc220031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dominance of an environmental solution – in green building certifications – over the social and the economic led many scholars and practitioners to consider Biophilic Design (BD) as an innovative way of designing. Deriving from “biophilia”, the term suggests reconciling the innate human desire of nature with our built environment. In a sense, there is a deliberate attempt to merge the philosophy of BD with pre-existing standardised certification systems, confirming compliance with established norms and standards; however, the certification of healthy buildings should primarily be determined not only by the technical characteristics of materials, rules and procedures, but also by the quality of life considering occupants’ emotional, intellectual and physical well-being. The literature review in this research paper included recent scientific publications about Biophilic Design, sustainability and green building certifications. To narrow down the selection criteria of references, researches that are of empirical nature and contextualised in Dubai were selected; moreover, the qualitative investigation in this research was enhanced by a pedagogical application in which students enrolled in the course “Building Systems and Codes” at the American University in the Emirates proposed ways to integrate Biophilic Design at buildings and urban scales. The findings of this research demonstrate that the concept of Biophilic Design is being considered in green building certifications like LEED, WELL, Fitwel, Living Building Challenge Certification and BREEAM. While the term “biophilic” was recently coined, its principles and tools were already previously implemented in architecture, as example in the famous Falling Water by Frank Lloyd Wright. Interpretation of Biophilic Design in formalisation and standardisation remains challenging to achieve human-centred design. The quest to measure Biophilic Design firstly, in construction costs and, secondly, humans’ well-being adds another layer of complexity. The critical approach of “biophilia” may be where the real value is.","PeriodicalId":35178,"journal":{"name":"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WILL BIOPHILIC DESIGN BECOME ANOTHER CHECKLIST?\",\"authors\":\"T. Haidamous\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/sc220031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dominance of an environmental solution – in green building certifications – over the social and the economic led many scholars and practitioners to consider Biophilic Design (BD) as an innovative way of designing. Deriving from “biophilia”, the term suggests reconciling the innate human desire of nature with our built environment. In a sense, there is a deliberate attempt to merge the philosophy of BD with pre-existing standardised certification systems, confirming compliance with established norms and standards; however, the certification of healthy buildings should primarily be determined not only by the technical characteristics of materials, rules and procedures, but also by the quality of life considering occupants’ emotional, intellectual and physical well-being. The literature review in this research paper included recent scientific publications about Biophilic Design, sustainability and green building certifications. To narrow down the selection criteria of references, researches that are of empirical nature and contextualised in Dubai were selected; moreover, the qualitative investigation in this research was enhanced by a pedagogical application in which students enrolled in the course “Building Systems and Codes” at the American University in the Emirates proposed ways to integrate Biophilic Design at buildings and urban scales. The findings of this research demonstrate that the concept of Biophilic Design is being considered in green building certifications like LEED, WELL, Fitwel, Living Building Challenge Certification and BREEAM. While the term “biophilic” was recently coined, its principles and tools were already previously implemented in architecture, as example in the famous Falling Water by Frank Lloyd Wright. Interpretation of Biophilic Design in formalisation and standardisation remains challenging to achieve human-centred design. The quest to measure Biophilic Design firstly, in construction costs and, secondly, humans’ well-being adds another layer of complexity. The critical approach of “biophilia” may be where the real value is.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/sc220031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/sc220031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在绿色建筑认证中,环境解决方案的主导地位超过了社会和经济,这使得许多学者和实践者认为亲生物设计(BD)是一种创新的设计方式。这个词来源于“biophilia”,意思是人类对自然的内在渴望与我们的建筑环境相协调。从某种意义上说,这是有意尝试将BD的理念与现有的标准化认证系统结合起来,确认符合既定的规范和标准;然而,健康建筑的认证不仅应主要通过材料的技术特性、规则和程序来确定,还应考虑到居住者的情感、智力和身体健康的生活质量。本研究论文的文献综述包括最近关于亲生物设计、可持续性和绿色建筑认证的科学出版物。为了缩小参考文献的选择标准,选择了具有经验性质和迪拜背景的研究;此外,本研究的定性调查得到了一项教学应用的加强,该应用中,阿联酋美国大学“建筑系统和规范”课程的学生提出了在建筑和城市尺度上整合亲生物设计的方法。这项研究的结果表明,绿色建筑认证(如LEED、WELL、Fitwel、Living building Challenge Certification和BREEAM)正在考虑亲生物设计的概念。虽然“亲生物”一词是最近才被创造出来的,但它的原则和工具已经在建筑中得到了应用,例如弗兰克·劳埃德·赖特著名的“落水”。在形式化和标准化方面解释亲生物设计仍然是实现以人为本的设计的挑战。对亲生物设计的探索首先是在建筑成本上,其次是在人类的福祉上,这增加了另一层复杂性。“亲生命”的批判方法可能才是真正的价值所在。
The dominance of an environmental solution – in green building certifications – over the social and the economic led many scholars and practitioners to consider Biophilic Design (BD) as an innovative way of designing. Deriving from “biophilia”, the term suggests reconciling the innate human desire of nature with our built environment. In a sense, there is a deliberate attempt to merge the philosophy of BD with pre-existing standardised certification systems, confirming compliance with established norms and standards; however, the certification of healthy buildings should primarily be determined not only by the technical characteristics of materials, rules and procedures, but also by the quality of life considering occupants’ emotional, intellectual and physical well-being. The literature review in this research paper included recent scientific publications about Biophilic Design, sustainability and green building certifications. To narrow down the selection criteria of references, researches that are of empirical nature and contextualised in Dubai were selected; moreover, the qualitative investigation in this research was enhanced by a pedagogical application in which students enrolled in the course “Building Systems and Codes” at the American University in the Emirates proposed ways to integrate Biophilic Design at buildings and urban scales. The findings of this research demonstrate that the concept of Biophilic Design is being considered in green building certifications like LEED, WELL, Fitwel, Living Building Challenge Certification and BREEAM. While the term “biophilic” was recently coined, its principles and tools were already previously implemented in architecture, as example in the famous Falling Water by Frank Lloyd Wright. Interpretation of Biophilic Design in formalisation and standardisation remains challenging to achieve human-centred design. The quest to measure Biophilic Design firstly, in construction costs and, secondly, humans’ well-being adds another layer of complexity. The critical approach of “biophilia” may be where the real value is.
期刊介绍:
WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment (ISSN: 1743-3541) includes volumes relating to the follow subject areas: Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Water Resources, Air Pollution, Design & Nature, Sustainable Development, Environmental Health