读玛丽·雪莱的《科学怪人》中的弥尔顿

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY
Lauren Shohet
{"title":"读玛丽·雪莱的《科学怪人》中的弥尔顿","authors":"Lauren Shohet","doi":"10.1353/MLT.2018.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article suggests that Frankenstein engages Paradise Lost with more consistency and nuance than critics have acknowledged. Rather than a straightforwardly agonistic response, the novel instead presents different kinds of Miltonic readers in its characters: the Milton-literate Creature, the Milton-oblivious Robert Walton, and the aware but studiously avoidant Victor Frankenstein. Redistributing labor from Milton's Adam, Eve, Satan, and God the Father to Frankenstein's various characters, the novel raises questions about the world of its characters and of Milton's epic. Practicing both adaptation and critique, Frankenstein dissents from other Romantic responses to prove surprisingly sympathetic to aspects of Paradise Lost's Reformist ethos.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"157 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2018.0016","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Milton in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Shohet\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/MLT.2018.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article suggests that Frankenstein engages Paradise Lost with more consistency and nuance than critics have acknowledged. Rather than a straightforwardly agonistic response, the novel instead presents different kinds of Miltonic readers in its characters: the Milton-literate Creature, the Milton-oblivious Robert Walton, and the aware but studiously avoidant Victor Frankenstein. Redistributing labor from Milton's Adam, Eve, Satan, and God the Father to Frankenstein's various characters, the novel raises questions about the world of its characters and of Milton's epic. Practicing both adaptation and critique, Frankenstein dissents from other Romantic responses to prove surprisingly sympathetic to aspects of Paradise Lost's Reformist ethos.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"157 - 182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2018.0016\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2018.0016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2018.0016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

文摘:这篇文章表明,弗兰肯斯坦在《失乐园》中的表现比评论家们所承认的更加一致和微妙。这部小说没有直接做出痛苦的回应,而是在其人物中呈现了不同类型的Miltonic读者:识字的Milton Creature,健忘的Robert Walton,以及有意识但刻意回避的Victor Frankenstein。这部小说将米尔顿笔下的亚当、夏娃、撒旦和父神的劳动重新分配给弗兰肯斯坦笔下的各种角色,引发了人们对其角色和米尔顿史诗世界的质疑。在实践改编和批判的同时,弗兰肯斯坦与其他浪漫主义回应不同,令人惊讶地对《失乐园》的改革者精神产生了共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading Milton in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
abstract:This article suggests that Frankenstein engages Paradise Lost with more consistency and nuance than critics have acknowledged. Rather than a straightforwardly agonistic response, the novel instead presents different kinds of Miltonic readers in its characters: the Milton-literate Creature, the Milton-oblivious Robert Walton, and the aware but studiously avoidant Victor Frankenstein. Redistributing labor from Milton's Adam, Eve, Satan, and God the Father to Frankenstein's various characters, the novel raises questions about the world of its characters and of Milton's epic. Practicing both adaptation and critique, Frankenstein dissents from other Romantic responses to prove surprisingly sympathetic to aspects of Paradise Lost's Reformist ethos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信