学者对澳大利亚卫生专业项目认证的目的和制定的看法:使用Yanow的解释性政策方法

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sarah Meiklejohn, J. Morphet, Kristal Lee, M. Baird, W. Hodgson, C. Palermo, Brian Coffey
{"title":"学者对澳大利亚卫生专业项目认证的目的和制定的看法:使用Yanow的解释性政策方法","authors":"Sarah Meiklejohn, J. Morphet, Kristal Lee, M. Baird, W. Hodgson, C. Palermo, Brian Coffey","doi":"10.1177/14782103231180333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a critical exploration of the espoused purpose and implementation of accreditation of health professions programs in Australia from the perspectives of academics at an Australian university. It examines enactment of accreditation in supporting the development of work-ready graduates through outcome-based education. By drawing upon Yanow’s interpretive policy approach, this qualitative study identifies similarities in perceptions of accreditation across health professions and draws attention to key tensions that must be addressed in the pursuit of outcome-based education. Concerns related to the inflexibility of accreditors, time and administrative requirements, and processes for educational review and innovation are highlighted. The article concludes by offering suggestions for changing accreditation practices to ensure future-focused work-ready graduates.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academics’ perspectives of the purpose and enactment of accreditation of health professions programs in Australia: Using Yanow’s interpretive policy approach\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Meiklejohn, J. Morphet, Kristal Lee, M. Baird, W. Hodgson, C. Palermo, Brian Coffey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14782103231180333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article offers a critical exploration of the espoused purpose and implementation of accreditation of health professions programs in Australia from the perspectives of academics at an Australian university. It examines enactment of accreditation in supporting the development of work-ready graduates through outcome-based education. By drawing upon Yanow’s interpretive policy approach, this qualitative study identifies similarities in perceptions of accreditation across health professions and draws attention to key tensions that must be addressed in the pursuit of outcome-based education. Concerns related to the inflexibility of accreditors, time and administrative requirements, and processes for educational review and innovation are highlighted. The article concludes by offering suggestions for changing accreditation practices to ensure future-focused work-ready graduates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Futures in Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Futures in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231180333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231180333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从澳大利亚大学学者的角度,对澳大利亚卫生专业认证项目的宗旨和实施进行了批判性的探索。它审查了认证的颁布,以支持通过注重成果的教育培养有工作能力的毕业生。通过借鉴Yanow的解释性政策方法,这项定性研究确定了不同卫生专业对认证的看法的相似性,并提请人们注意在追求基于结果的教育时必须解决的关键紧张关系。强调了与认证机构的灵活性、时间和行政要求以及教育审查和创新流程有关的问题。文章最后提出了改变认证实践的建议,以确保毕业生能够专注于未来的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academics’ perspectives of the purpose and enactment of accreditation of health professions programs in Australia: Using Yanow’s interpretive policy approach
This article offers a critical exploration of the espoused purpose and implementation of accreditation of health professions programs in Australia from the perspectives of academics at an Australian university. It examines enactment of accreditation in supporting the development of work-ready graduates through outcome-based education. By drawing upon Yanow’s interpretive policy approach, this qualitative study identifies similarities in perceptions of accreditation across health professions and draws attention to key tensions that must be addressed in the pursuit of outcome-based education. Concerns related to the inflexibility of accreditors, time and administrative requirements, and processes for educational review and innovation are highlighted. The article concludes by offering suggestions for changing accreditation practices to ensure future-focused work-ready graduates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信