回答洛夫克拉夫特:克莱夫·巴克的具体化小说

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Curtis D. Carbonell
{"title":"回答洛夫克拉夫特:克莱夫·巴克的具体化小说","authors":"Curtis D. Carbonell","doi":"10.1386/HOST_00031_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article asks how Clive Barker responds to H. P. Lovecraft as a horror writer. It sees in Barker a particular example of how cosmic horror emerges, even as expected Gothic tropes become renewed with interesting variations. In particular, it foregrounds a resistance by Barker to Lovecraft’s insistence that the Weird be a place where writers hint at the monsters that cause ultimate dread rather than drawing them. Barker, though, refuses to balk at such a demand, channelling the same instinct that the later Lovecraft himself developed in categorizing with scientific-like granularity the often horrific particulars of the monstrous. This article poses the Cenobites as a fitting example of how Barker combines cosmic and Gothic tropes, both within the frames of the posthuman and draconic, even as they morphed within a shared universe rooted in a Christianized metanarrative. It focuses on The Scarlet Gospels as the most fitting text in which Barker demonstrates his ability to represent the unrepresentable, a dominant concept within fruitful theorizing by thinkers as diverse as Eugene Thacker, Graham Harman and Thomas Ligotti.","PeriodicalId":41545,"journal":{"name":"Horror Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"97-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Answering Lovecraft: Clive Barker’s embodied fiction\",\"authors\":\"Curtis D. Carbonell\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/HOST_00031_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article asks how Clive Barker responds to H. P. Lovecraft as a horror writer. It sees in Barker a particular example of how cosmic horror emerges, even as expected Gothic tropes become renewed with interesting variations. In particular, it foregrounds a resistance by Barker to Lovecraft’s insistence that the Weird be a place where writers hint at the monsters that cause ultimate dread rather than drawing them. Barker, though, refuses to balk at such a demand, channelling the same instinct that the later Lovecraft himself developed in categorizing with scientific-like granularity the often horrific particulars of the monstrous. This article poses the Cenobites as a fitting example of how Barker combines cosmic and Gothic tropes, both within the frames of the posthuman and draconic, even as they morphed within a shared universe rooted in a Christianized metanarrative. It focuses on The Scarlet Gospels as the most fitting text in which Barker demonstrates his ability to represent the unrepresentable, a dominant concept within fruitful theorizing by thinkers as diverse as Eugene Thacker, Graham Harman and Thomas Ligotti.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horror Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"97-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horror Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/HOST_00031_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horror Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/HOST_00031_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章问克莱夫·巴克如何回应H.P.洛夫克拉夫特作为一个恐怖作家。它在巴克身上看到了宇宙恐怖如何出现的一个特殊例子,尽管预期中的哥特式比喻随着有趣的变化而更新。特别是,它突出了巴克对洛夫克拉夫特坚持认为怪异是一个作家暗示怪物而不是描绘怪物的地方的抵制。然而,巴克拒绝拒绝这样的要求,他传递了与后来的洛夫克拉夫特本人一样的本能,用科学般的粒度对怪物的可怕细节进行分类。这篇文章将Cenobites作为一个恰当的例子,展示了巴克如何在后人类和龙的框架内结合宇宙和哥特式的比喻,即使它们在植根于基督教元叙事的共享宇宙中变形。它聚焦于《猩红色福音书》,认为这是巴克在其中展示了他在尤金·塔克、格雷厄姆·哈曼和托马斯·利戈蒂等思想家富有成果的理论中代表不可代表性的主导概念的能力的最合适的文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Answering Lovecraft: Clive Barker’s embodied fiction
This article asks how Clive Barker responds to H. P. Lovecraft as a horror writer. It sees in Barker a particular example of how cosmic horror emerges, even as expected Gothic tropes become renewed with interesting variations. In particular, it foregrounds a resistance by Barker to Lovecraft’s insistence that the Weird be a place where writers hint at the monsters that cause ultimate dread rather than drawing them. Barker, though, refuses to balk at such a demand, channelling the same instinct that the later Lovecraft himself developed in categorizing with scientific-like granularity the often horrific particulars of the monstrous. This article poses the Cenobites as a fitting example of how Barker combines cosmic and Gothic tropes, both within the frames of the posthuman and draconic, even as they morphed within a shared universe rooted in a Christianized metanarrative. It focuses on The Scarlet Gospels as the most fitting text in which Barker demonstrates his ability to represent the unrepresentable, a dominant concept within fruitful theorizing by thinkers as diverse as Eugene Thacker, Graham Harman and Thomas Ligotti.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Horror Studies
Horror Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信