阈值设置对神经反馈训练的影响

Q3 Medicine
S. Nam, S. Choi
{"title":"阈值设置对神经反馈训练的影响","authors":"S. Nam, S. Choi","doi":"10.15540/NR.7.3.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to confirm the effect of threshold setting on the performance of neurofeedback training. The experimental conditions used to confirm the effect of the different threshold settings on the degree of electroencephalographic (EEG) changes in the initial training conditions were unfamiliar to neurofeedback. Rewards were presented in low , medium , and high frequency groups according to the different threshold settings. The sensory-motor rhythm (SMR; 12–15 Hz) neurofeedback protocol was performed for all groups. We looked at whether the posttraining brain wave increases were significant in each group compared to the brain waves during training. The SMR protocol was performed in a single session and consisted of four blocks totaling 10 minutes. EEG data was collected before training as a baseline, during training, and posttraining. The results of the group analysis showed that the mean SMR value of the posterior EEG in the high frequency group was significantly higher than the SMR value in the first EEG block. The threshold settings affected learning in neurofeedback training. It was found that initially setting the threshold value for easy compensation was more effective than the setting for hard compensation.","PeriodicalId":37439,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRegulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Threshold Setting on Neurofeedback Training\",\"authors\":\"S. Nam, S. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.15540/NR.7.3.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to confirm the effect of threshold setting on the performance of neurofeedback training. The experimental conditions used to confirm the effect of the different threshold settings on the degree of electroencephalographic (EEG) changes in the initial training conditions were unfamiliar to neurofeedback. Rewards were presented in low , medium , and high frequency groups according to the different threshold settings. The sensory-motor rhythm (SMR; 12–15 Hz) neurofeedback protocol was performed for all groups. We looked at whether the posttraining brain wave increases were significant in each group compared to the brain waves during training. The SMR protocol was performed in a single session and consisted of four blocks totaling 10 minutes. EEG data was collected before training as a baseline, during training, and posttraining. The results of the group analysis showed that the mean SMR value of the posterior EEG in the high frequency group was significantly higher than the SMR value in the first EEG block. The threshold settings affected learning in neurofeedback training. It was found that initially setting the threshold value for easy compensation was more effective than the setting for hard compensation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15540/NR.7.3.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRegulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15540/NR.7.3.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在证实阈值设置对神经反馈训练表现的影响。用于确认不同阈值设置对初始训练条件下脑电图(EEG)变化程度的影响的实验条件对神经反馈来说是陌生的。根据不同的阈值设置,奖励分为低频组、中频组和高频组。所有组均采用感觉运动节律(SMR;12-15 Hz)神经反馈方案。我们观察了与训练期间的脑电波相比,每组训练后的脑电波增加是否显著。SMR协议在单个会话中执行,并且由总共10分钟的四个块组成。在训练前、训练中和训练后收集脑电图数据作为基线。组分析结果显示,高频组后段脑电图的平均SMR值显著高于第一个脑电块的SMR值。阈值设置影响神经反馈训练中的学习。发现最初设置用于容易补偿的阈值比设置用于硬补偿的阈值更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Threshold Setting on Neurofeedback Training
This study aimed to confirm the effect of threshold setting on the performance of neurofeedback training. The experimental conditions used to confirm the effect of the different threshold settings on the degree of electroencephalographic (EEG) changes in the initial training conditions were unfamiliar to neurofeedback. Rewards were presented in low , medium , and high frequency groups according to the different threshold settings. The sensory-motor rhythm (SMR; 12–15 Hz) neurofeedback protocol was performed for all groups. We looked at whether the posttraining brain wave increases were significant in each group compared to the brain waves during training. The SMR protocol was performed in a single session and consisted of four blocks totaling 10 minutes. EEG data was collected before training as a baseline, during training, and posttraining. The results of the group analysis showed that the mean SMR value of the posterior EEG in the high frequency group was significantly higher than the SMR value in the first EEG block. The threshold settings affected learning in neurofeedback training. It was found that initially setting the threshold value for easy compensation was more effective than the setting for hard compensation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRegulation
NeuroRegulation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRegulation is a peer-reviewed journal providing an integrated, multidisciplinary perspective on clinically relevant research, treatment, reviews, and public policy for neuroregulation and neurotherapy. NeuroRegulation publishes important findings in these fields with a focus on electroencephalography (EEG), neurofeedback (EEG biofeedback), quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), psychophysiology, biofeedback, heart rate variability, photobiomodulation, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Simulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS); with a focus on treatment of psychiatric, mind-body, and neurological disorders. In addition to research findings and reviews, it is important to stress that publication of case reports is always useful in furthering the advancement of an intervention for both clinical and normative functioning. We strive for high quality and interesting empirical topics presented in a rigorous and scholarly manner. The journal draws from expertise inside and outside of the International Society for Neurofeedback & Research (ISNR) to deliver material which integrates the diverse aspects of the field, to include: *basic science *clinical aspects *treatment evaluation *philosophy *training and certification issues *technology and equipment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信