基于场景的临床医生使用电子健康记录培训的有效性——系统文献综述

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions
R. Olley, Jeremy Hozynka
{"title":"基于场景的临床医生使用电子健康记录培训的有效性——系统文献综述","authors":"R. Olley, Jeremy Hozynka","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i1.1711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digitalisation of healthcare represents another change challenge for clinicians, and the most prominent of these is the Electronic Health Record (EHR).  Adopting the EHR, including the training of clinicians of all disciplines, often does not occur effectively, which increases the risk of adverse events and the reduction in the quality and safety of clinical care.   The competent use of the EHR requires clinician user training.  One form of training is scenario-based. The questions asked of the literature in this SLR are what evidence exists as to the effectiveness of using scenarios to train clinicians in using the EHR, and is there a research gap in this evidence to inform future research? \nTo undertake this systematic review of the literature, the researchers implemented the PRISMA Method. Only highly ranked, health-related academic databases accessed through an electronic library catalogue were used to search for relevant peer-reviewed/refereed articles.  The decision to apply the PRISMA method was based on the PRISMA statement, which safeguards comprehensive reporting and transparency to ensure inferred recommendations and interventions are based on the best available evidence.   \n6,898 records were returned from Boolean searches for articles published between November 2018 to November 2021.  Five articles were included for greater analysis following exclusions by title review, abstract review, and quality assessment.  Quality assessment of articles reporting empirical studies relating to the effectiveness of using scenarios in this type of training was performed using the standard quality assessment scoresheet by Kmet [48]. \nThree themes emerged from the literature.  The centrality of workflow, Clinician engagement are key, and scenario-based training is one of many training strategies implemented.  \nThe authors found that further rigorous research studies are required to enhance the evidence body for the continued usage of scenario-based training of clinicians to effectively use the EHR, particularly as the digital landscape within health continues to evolve.  Moreover, the authors posit that further research on scenario-based EHR training of clinicians should include: \n \nScenario-based training is just one part of a broader and blended EHR training suite. \nEnsuring future studies encompass a diversity of all fields of clinical roles within the research and, \nInclude standardised terminology naming for clinicians' scenario-based EHR training within the studies. \n","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Scenario-Based Training of Clinicians in the Use of Electronic Health Records – A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"R. Olley, Jeremy Hozynka\",\"doi\":\"10.24083/apjhm.v18i1.1711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The digitalisation of healthcare represents another change challenge for clinicians, and the most prominent of these is the Electronic Health Record (EHR).  Adopting the EHR, including the training of clinicians of all disciplines, often does not occur effectively, which increases the risk of adverse events and the reduction in the quality and safety of clinical care.   The competent use of the EHR requires clinician user training.  One form of training is scenario-based. The questions asked of the literature in this SLR are what evidence exists as to the effectiveness of using scenarios to train clinicians in using the EHR, and is there a research gap in this evidence to inform future research? \\nTo undertake this systematic review of the literature, the researchers implemented the PRISMA Method. Only highly ranked, health-related academic databases accessed through an electronic library catalogue were used to search for relevant peer-reviewed/refereed articles.  The decision to apply the PRISMA method was based on the PRISMA statement, which safeguards comprehensive reporting and transparency to ensure inferred recommendations and interventions are based on the best available evidence.   \\n6,898 records were returned from Boolean searches for articles published between November 2018 to November 2021.  Five articles were included for greater analysis following exclusions by title review, abstract review, and quality assessment.  Quality assessment of articles reporting empirical studies relating to the effectiveness of using scenarios in this type of training was performed using the standard quality assessment scoresheet by Kmet [48]. \\nThree themes emerged from the literature.  The centrality of workflow, Clinician engagement are key, and scenario-based training is one of many training strategies implemented.  \\nThe authors found that further rigorous research studies are required to enhance the evidence body for the continued usage of scenario-based training of clinicians to effectively use the EHR, particularly as the digital landscape within health continues to evolve.  Moreover, the authors posit that further research on scenario-based EHR training of clinicians should include: \\n \\nScenario-based training is just one part of a broader and blended EHR training suite. \\nEnsuring future studies encompass a diversity of all fields of clinical roles within the research and, \\nInclude standardised terminology naming for clinicians' scenario-based EHR training within the studies. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i1.1711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i1.1711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健的数字化对临床医生来说是另一个变革挑战,其中最突出的是电子健康记录(EHR)。采用EHR,包括对所有学科的临床医生进行培训,通常不会有效进行,这增加了不良事件的风险,降低了临床护理的质量和安全性。EHR的有效使用需要临床医生用户培训。一种形式的培训是基于情景的。本SLR中对文献提出的问题是,关于使用场景培训临床医生使用EHR的有效性,存在哪些证据,这些证据中是否存在研究空白,为未来的研究提供信息?为了对文献进行系统的回顾,研究人员采用了PRISMA方法。只有通过电子图书馆目录访问的排名靠前、与健康相关的学术数据库才用于搜索相关的同行评审/参考文章。应用PRISMA方法的决定是基于PRISMA声明,该声明保障全面报告和透明度,以确保推断的建议和干预措施基于最佳可用证据。从2018年11月至2021年11月期间发表的文章的布尔搜索中返回了6898条记录。在标题审查、摘要审查和质量评估排除后,纳入了5篇文章进行更深入的分析。Kmet[48]使用标准质量评估记分表对报告与在此类培训中使用场景的有效性相关的实证研究的文章进行了质量评估。文学作品中出现了三个主题。工作流程的中心性、临床医生的参与度是关键,基于场景的培训是实施的众多培训策略之一。作者发现,需要进行进一步严格的研究,以增强临床医生继续使用基于场景的培训以有效使用EHR的证据,特别是在健康领域的数字环境不断发展的情况下。此外,作者认为,对临床医生基于情景的EHR培训的进一步研究应该包括:基于情景的培训只是更广泛的混合EHR培训套件的一部分。确保未来的研究涵盖研究中所有临床角色领域的多样性,并在研究中包括临床医生基于情景的EHR培训的标准化术语命名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Scenario-Based Training of Clinicians in the Use of Electronic Health Records – A Systematic Literature Review
The digitalisation of healthcare represents another change challenge for clinicians, and the most prominent of these is the Electronic Health Record (EHR).  Adopting the EHR, including the training of clinicians of all disciplines, often does not occur effectively, which increases the risk of adverse events and the reduction in the quality and safety of clinical care.   The competent use of the EHR requires clinician user training.  One form of training is scenario-based. The questions asked of the literature in this SLR are what evidence exists as to the effectiveness of using scenarios to train clinicians in using the EHR, and is there a research gap in this evidence to inform future research? To undertake this systematic review of the literature, the researchers implemented the PRISMA Method. Only highly ranked, health-related academic databases accessed through an electronic library catalogue were used to search for relevant peer-reviewed/refereed articles.  The decision to apply the PRISMA method was based on the PRISMA statement, which safeguards comprehensive reporting and transparency to ensure inferred recommendations and interventions are based on the best available evidence.   6,898 records were returned from Boolean searches for articles published between November 2018 to November 2021.  Five articles were included for greater analysis following exclusions by title review, abstract review, and quality assessment.  Quality assessment of articles reporting empirical studies relating to the effectiveness of using scenarios in this type of training was performed using the standard quality assessment scoresheet by Kmet [48]. Three themes emerged from the literature.  The centrality of workflow, Clinician engagement are key, and scenario-based training is one of many training strategies implemented.  The authors found that further rigorous research studies are required to enhance the evidence body for the continued usage of scenario-based training of clinicians to effectively use the EHR, particularly as the digital landscape within health continues to evolve.  Moreover, the authors posit that further research on scenario-based EHR training of clinicians should include: Scenario-based training is just one part of a broader and blended EHR training suite. Ensuring future studies encompass a diversity of all fields of clinical roles within the research and, Include standardised terminology naming for clinicians' scenario-based EHR training within the studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信