骑围栏40.1

Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1177/8756870521992897
Ginevra Courtade
{"title":"骑围栏40.1","authors":"Ginevra Courtade","doi":"10.1177/8756870521992897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this first issue of Volume 40, I am pleased to present four research reports and a program description from colleagues across the country. In the first article, Randolph, Hott, Chubb, and CruzTorres provide the results of a study implemented to explore the efficacy of iCoaching to increase the use of behaviorspecific praise (BSP). Following a focused professional development (PD), three educators working in a rural center-based classroom for students with emotional and behavioral disabilities increased the use of BSP while participating in iCoaching. Furthermore, BSP rates were maintained after iCoaching was withdrawn. The authors provide a discussion of implications for using iCoaching with rural educators and future directions for research. The next two articles focus on postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. First, Bouck, Long, and Costello conducted a secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 to examine parent and youth expectations regarding postschool outcomes for students with intellectual disability relative to school locale (i.e., rural, urban, and suburban) and severity of intellectual disability. The authors report that the results of the analysis indicate that youth from rural schools reported high rates of positive postschool expectations with regard to independent living and being employed, and their rates relative to independent living exceeded parental expectations. The authors also report results of logistical regression analyses and discuss findings, implications for practice, and future research. Next, Swindlehurst and Berry report on program improvement efforts by a university to embed more evidence-based transition practices into their preservice teacher preparation program. Preservice teachers’ perceptions of the impact of the revision were measured and are discussed. The authors include an outline of key aspects of the program revision and online resources for faculty to utilize when seeking to improve their special education preparation program in the area of postsecondary transition The final research report, by Beck and DeSutter, focuses on special education professionals as facilitators of Individualized Education Program (IEP) team meetings. The authors used the results of semi-structured interviews to explore how facilitators see their roles during IEP meetings and how the IEP facilitators envision an ideal IEP meeting in school districts with rural schools. Findings indicate that facilitators see their roles in three distinct parts and view an ideal IEP meeting as inclusive of a strong presence by members, parental involvement, and achieving true collaboration. The authors conclude by discussing implications for practice. The authors of the final article in this issue describe a PD model modified to support educators in rural areas who face challenges due to a lack of opportunities and travel requirements. Hardesty et al. adapted the ECHO Model for use in education and have implemented networks that connect local providers with experts in the areas of autism, assistive technology, secondary transition, and behavioral supports. Analysis of participant survey data indicates that educators found ECHO highly acceptable and reported improved skills and knowledge. The authors discuss the effectiveness and potential of the ECHO for Education model in rural settings. I would like to thank all the authors who contributed to Volume 40, Issue 1, of Rural Special Education Quarterly (RSEQ). I hope you enjoy this new issue and will be able to use some of the ideas in your own community of practice. Look forward to an upcoming issue that concludes our special series about supporting educators, students, and families during COVID-19. Finally, I would like to announce a change in the Managing Editor. After 3 years of service, Dr. Tina Hudson has stepped down from the position. I would like to thank Tina for all her hard work managing every RSEQ manuscript that has come through the ScholarOne system since we transitioned to Hammill/SAGE. I wish Tina good luck in her future! I would like to welcome Caroline Fitchett, M.Ed., as the new Managing Editor. Caroline is a first-year doctoral student at the University of Louisville. Welcome Caroline!","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/8756870521992897","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Riding Fences 40.1\",\"authors\":\"Ginevra Courtade\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/8756870521992897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this first issue of Volume 40, I am pleased to present four research reports and a program description from colleagues across the country. In the first article, Randolph, Hott, Chubb, and CruzTorres provide the results of a study implemented to explore the efficacy of iCoaching to increase the use of behaviorspecific praise (BSP). Following a focused professional development (PD), three educators working in a rural center-based classroom for students with emotional and behavioral disabilities increased the use of BSP while participating in iCoaching. Furthermore, BSP rates were maintained after iCoaching was withdrawn. The authors provide a discussion of implications for using iCoaching with rural educators and future directions for research. The next two articles focus on postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. First, Bouck, Long, and Costello conducted a secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 to examine parent and youth expectations regarding postschool outcomes for students with intellectual disability relative to school locale (i.e., rural, urban, and suburban) and severity of intellectual disability. The authors report that the results of the analysis indicate that youth from rural schools reported high rates of positive postschool expectations with regard to independent living and being employed, and their rates relative to independent living exceeded parental expectations. The authors also report results of logistical regression analyses and discuss findings, implications for practice, and future research. Next, Swindlehurst and Berry report on program improvement efforts by a university to embed more evidence-based transition practices into their preservice teacher preparation program. Preservice teachers’ perceptions of the impact of the revision were measured and are discussed. The authors include an outline of key aspects of the program revision and online resources for faculty to utilize when seeking to improve their special education preparation program in the area of postsecondary transition The final research report, by Beck and DeSutter, focuses on special education professionals as facilitators of Individualized Education Program (IEP) team meetings. The authors used the results of semi-structured interviews to explore how facilitators see their roles during IEP meetings and how the IEP facilitators envision an ideal IEP meeting in school districts with rural schools. Findings indicate that facilitators see their roles in three distinct parts and view an ideal IEP meeting as inclusive of a strong presence by members, parental involvement, and achieving true collaboration. The authors conclude by discussing implications for practice. The authors of the final article in this issue describe a PD model modified to support educators in rural areas who face challenges due to a lack of opportunities and travel requirements. Hardesty et al. adapted the ECHO Model for use in education and have implemented networks that connect local providers with experts in the areas of autism, assistive technology, secondary transition, and behavioral supports. Analysis of participant survey data indicates that educators found ECHO highly acceptable and reported improved skills and knowledge. The authors discuss the effectiveness and potential of the ECHO for Education model in rural settings. I would like to thank all the authors who contributed to Volume 40, Issue 1, of Rural Special Education Quarterly (RSEQ). I hope you enjoy this new issue and will be able to use some of the ideas in your own community of practice. Look forward to an upcoming issue that concludes our special series about supporting educators, students, and families during COVID-19. Finally, I would like to announce a change in the Managing Editor. After 3 years of service, Dr. Tina Hudson has stepped down from the position. I would like to thank Tina for all her hard work managing every RSEQ manuscript that has come through the ScholarOne system since we transitioned to Hammill/SAGE. I wish Tina good luck in her future! I would like to welcome Caroline Fitchett, M.Ed., as the new Managing Editor. Caroline is a first-year doctoral student at the University of Louisville. Welcome Caroline!\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/8756870521992897\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870521992897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870521992897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第40卷的第一期中,我很高兴地介绍来自全国各地同事的四份研究报告和项目描述。在第一篇文章中,Randolph, Hott, Chubb和CruzTorres提供了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在探索iccoaching对提高行为特异性表扬(BSP)使用的有效性。在重点专业发展(PD)之后,三名教育工作者在农村中心教室为有情感和行为障碍的学生工作,在参与iccoaching的同时增加了BSP的使用。此外,在iccoaching退出后,BSP率保持不变。作者讨论了在农村教育工作者中使用iccoaching的意义以及未来的研究方向。接下来的两篇文章主要关注残疾青年的毕业后成果。首先,布克、朗和科斯特洛对2012年全国纵向过渡研究进行了二次分析,以检验父母和年轻人对智力残疾学生毕业后的结果的期望,这些学生与学校所在地(即农村、城市和郊区)和智力残疾的严重程度有关。作者报告说,分析结果表明,农村学校的青年在独立生活和就业方面对毕业后的积极期望的比例很高,他们独立生活的比例超过了父母的期望。作者还报告了逻辑回归分析的结果,并讨论了研究结果、对实践的影响和未来的研究。接下来,Swindlehurst和Berry报告了一所大学在将更多基于证据的过渡实践纳入其职前教师准备计划方面所做的项目改进工作。职前教师对修订影响的看法进行了测量和讨论。作者概述了项目修订的关键方面,并为教师提供了在线资源,以便在寻求改善高等教育过渡领域的特殊教育准备项目时使用。Beck和DeSutter的最终研究报告侧重于作为个性化教育项目(IEP)团队会议促进者的特殊教育专业人员。作者使用半结构化访谈的结果来探讨促进者如何看待他们在IEP会议中的角色,以及IEP促进者如何设想在有农村学校的学区举行理想的IEP会议。研究结果表明,辅导员将自己的角色分为三个不同的部分,并认为理想的IEP会议包括成员的强烈参与、父母的参与和实现真正的合作。作者最后讨论了对实践的启示。本期最后一篇文章的作者描述了一个PD模型,该模型经过修改,可以支持由于缺乏机会和旅行需求而面临挑战的农村地区的教育工作者。Hardesty等人将ECHO模型应用于教育,并实施了将当地提供者与自闭症、辅助技术、二次过渡和行为支持领域的专家联系起来的网络。对参与者调查数据的分析表明,教育工作者对ECHO的接受程度很高,并报告了技能和知识的提高。作者讨论了农村环境中ECHO教育模式的有效性和潜力。感谢为《农村特殊教育季刊》(RSEQ)第40卷第1期撰稿的所有作者。我希望你喜欢这个新问题,并能够在你自己的实践社区中使用其中的一些想法。期待即将出版的一期,它将结束我们关于在COVID-19期间支持教育工作者、学生和家庭的特别系列。最后,我想宣布总编辑的变动。经过3年的服务,蒂娜·哈德森博士已经从该职位卸任。我要感谢Tina,自从我们过渡到Hammill/SAGE以来,她在管理通过ScholarOne系统的每一份RSEQ手稿方面所做的辛勤工作。我祝蒂娜未来好运!欢迎卡罗琳·菲切特,ed医生。,成为新任总编辑。卡洛琳是路易斯维尔大学一年级的博士生。欢迎卡洛琳!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Riding Fences 40.1
In this first issue of Volume 40, I am pleased to present four research reports and a program description from colleagues across the country. In the first article, Randolph, Hott, Chubb, and CruzTorres provide the results of a study implemented to explore the efficacy of iCoaching to increase the use of behaviorspecific praise (BSP). Following a focused professional development (PD), three educators working in a rural center-based classroom for students with emotional and behavioral disabilities increased the use of BSP while participating in iCoaching. Furthermore, BSP rates were maintained after iCoaching was withdrawn. The authors provide a discussion of implications for using iCoaching with rural educators and future directions for research. The next two articles focus on postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. First, Bouck, Long, and Costello conducted a secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 to examine parent and youth expectations regarding postschool outcomes for students with intellectual disability relative to school locale (i.e., rural, urban, and suburban) and severity of intellectual disability. The authors report that the results of the analysis indicate that youth from rural schools reported high rates of positive postschool expectations with regard to independent living and being employed, and their rates relative to independent living exceeded parental expectations. The authors also report results of logistical regression analyses and discuss findings, implications for practice, and future research. Next, Swindlehurst and Berry report on program improvement efforts by a university to embed more evidence-based transition practices into their preservice teacher preparation program. Preservice teachers’ perceptions of the impact of the revision were measured and are discussed. The authors include an outline of key aspects of the program revision and online resources for faculty to utilize when seeking to improve their special education preparation program in the area of postsecondary transition The final research report, by Beck and DeSutter, focuses on special education professionals as facilitators of Individualized Education Program (IEP) team meetings. The authors used the results of semi-structured interviews to explore how facilitators see their roles during IEP meetings and how the IEP facilitators envision an ideal IEP meeting in school districts with rural schools. Findings indicate that facilitators see their roles in three distinct parts and view an ideal IEP meeting as inclusive of a strong presence by members, parental involvement, and achieving true collaboration. The authors conclude by discussing implications for practice. The authors of the final article in this issue describe a PD model modified to support educators in rural areas who face challenges due to a lack of opportunities and travel requirements. Hardesty et al. adapted the ECHO Model for use in education and have implemented networks that connect local providers with experts in the areas of autism, assistive technology, secondary transition, and behavioral supports. Analysis of participant survey data indicates that educators found ECHO highly acceptable and reported improved skills and knowledge. The authors discuss the effectiveness and potential of the ECHO for Education model in rural settings. I would like to thank all the authors who contributed to Volume 40, Issue 1, of Rural Special Education Quarterly (RSEQ). I hope you enjoy this new issue and will be able to use some of the ideas in your own community of practice. Look forward to an upcoming issue that concludes our special series about supporting educators, students, and families during COVID-19. Finally, I would like to announce a change in the Managing Editor. After 3 years of service, Dr. Tina Hudson has stepped down from the position. I would like to thank Tina for all her hard work managing every RSEQ manuscript that has come through the ScholarOne system since we transitioned to Hammill/SAGE. I wish Tina good luck in her future! I would like to welcome Caroline Fitchett, M.Ed., as the new Managing Editor. Caroline is a first-year doctoral student at the University of Louisville. Welcome Caroline!
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信