J. Buitendag, S. Variawa, Aashish Diayar, Pieter Snyders, Pieter Rademan, N. Allopi, D. McGreevy, T. Horer, G. Oosthuizen, ABO Trauma Registry Group
{"title":"间歇性主动脉球囊闭塞的使用:来自ABO创伤登记处的报告","authors":"J. Buitendag, S. Variawa, Aashish Diayar, Pieter Snyders, Pieter Rademan, N. Allopi, D. McGreevy, T. Horer, G. Oosthuizen, ABO Trauma Registry Group","doi":"10.26676/jevtm.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a helpful adjunct in the managementof hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding in the abdomen or pelvis. Ischemia distal to the occlusion is a concern;intermittent aortic balloon inflation (i-REBOA) is a novel way to achieve decreased ischemia time.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the multinational ABO Trauma Registry. All patients enteredbetween January 2016 and December 2019 were included.Results: The sample consisted of 157 patients. There were 57 patients in the i-REBOA group (36%) and 100 in theREBOA group (64%). The groups were similar in gender (P = 0.50), age (P = 0.17), mechanism of injury (P = 0.42), andinjury severity score (P = 0.13). The levels of international normalized ratio (INR) (P < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastintime (aPTT) (P < 0.01) and lactate (P = 0.02) were higher in the i-REBOA group. Total balloon inflation times werelonger in the i-REBOA group (P < 0.01). Major complication rates did not differ between groups. Mortality rates betweengroups were similar in the Emergency Department (ED) (3.8% for i-REBOA vs 10.1%; P = 0.17), within 24 hours (43.4% fori-REBOA vs 38.2%; P = 0.54), and at 30 days (63.6% for i-REBOA vs 48.4%; P = 0.07).Conclusions: The data from this registry show that i-REBOA is currently being used and may allow for longer totalballoon inflation times without higher morbidity or mortality rates.","PeriodicalId":41233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Intermittent Aortic Balloon Occlusion: Report from the ABO Trauma Registry\",\"authors\":\"J. Buitendag, S. Variawa, Aashish Diayar, Pieter Snyders, Pieter Rademan, N. Allopi, D. McGreevy, T. Horer, G. Oosthuizen, ABO Trauma Registry Group\",\"doi\":\"10.26676/jevtm.275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a helpful adjunct in the managementof hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding in the abdomen or pelvis. Ischemia distal to the occlusion is a concern;intermittent aortic balloon inflation (i-REBOA) is a novel way to achieve decreased ischemia time.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the multinational ABO Trauma Registry. All patients enteredbetween January 2016 and December 2019 were included.Results: The sample consisted of 157 patients. There were 57 patients in the i-REBOA group (36%) and 100 in theREBOA group (64%). The groups were similar in gender (P = 0.50), age (P = 0.17), mechanism of injury (P = 0.42), andinjury severity score (P = 0.13). The levels of international normalized ratio (INR) (P < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastintime (aPTT) (P < 0.01) and lactate (P = 0.02) were higher in the i-REBOA group. Total balloon inflation times werelonger in the i-REBOA group (P < 0.01). Major complication rates did not differ between groups. Mortality rates betweengroups were similar in the Emergency Department (ED) (3.8% for i-REBOA vs 10.1%; P = 0.17), within 24 hours (43.4% fori-REBOA vs 38.2%; P = 0.54), and at 30 days (63.6% for i-REBOA vs 48.4%; P = 0.07).Conclusions: The data from this registry show that i-REBOA is currently being used and may allow for longer totalballoon inflation times without higher morbidity or mortality rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of Intermittent Aortic Balloon Occlusion: Report from the ABO Trauma Registry
Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a helpful adjunct in the managementof hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding in the abdomen or pelvis. Ischemia distal to the occlusion is a concern;intermittent aortic balloon inflation (i-REBOA) is a novel way to achieve decreased ischemia time.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the multinational ABO Trauma Registry. All patients enteredbetween January 2016 and December 2019 were included.Results: The sample consisted of 157 patients. There were 57 patients in the i-REBOA group (36%) and 100 in theREBOA group (64%). The groups were similar in gender (P = 0.50), age (P = 0.17), mechanism of injury (P = 0.42), andinjury severity score (P = 0.13). The levels of international normalized ratio (INR) (P < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastintime (aPTT) (P < 0.01) and lactate (P = 0.02) were higher in the i-REBOA group. Total balloon inflation times werelonger in the i-REBOA group (P < 0.01). Major complication rates did not differ between groups. Mortality rates betweengroups were similar in the Emergency Department (ED) (3.8% for i-REBOA vs 10.1%; P = 0.17), within 24 hours (43.4% fori-REBOA vs 38.2%; P = 0.54), and at 30 days (63.6% for i-REBOA vs 48.4%; P = 0.07).Conclusions: The data from this registry show that i-REBOA is currently being used and may allow for longer totalballoon inflation times without higher morbidity or mortality rates.