运动中的马克思:语境中的操作主义

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Samuel Beckenhauer
{"title":"运动中的马克思:语境中的操作主义","authors":"Samuel Beckenhauer","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2022.2146290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antonio Negri’s Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context (2022) is the first installment of a planned trilogy. This work collects Negri’s foundational texts and recent talks relating to his theoretical interventions on operaismo or workerism. The book contains three parts. The first theorizes the formation of what Negri calls the social worker, emphasizing the importance of cognitive labor, and the processes of subjectivation as a response to worker upheavals with three essays published between 1974 and 1992. The second section, “Workers and Capital Today,” investigates contemporary alterations in class composition. Negri here uses the concept of immaterial labor, as well as Karl Marx’s notions of the general intellect and real subsumption. Finally, in the third section, “Polemical Considerations,” Negri strongly opposes the “post” in so-called post-operaismo and reflects on his own political break with Mario Tronti. This break, Negri suggests, came down to Tronti’s calculation that national political sovereignty is required to tame transnational capital. Negri theorizes transformations in labor since the 1960s. He argues that changes in labor after ‘1968’ can primarily be understood as a reaction by capital to worker militancy. The production and modulation of subjectivity takes on greater focus as labor becomes more collaborative, non-repetitive, and integrated alongside information technologies. Negri compares what he calls the “mass” worker—whom he associates with Taylorism’s labor process, Fordism’s working-day and wage relation, and Keynesian state intervention (14–15)—to the social worker, who takes form following the social protests symbolized by the year 1968. For him, the end of the Bretton Woods system and the 1973 oil crisis informed capital’s reaction to worker upheaval. Mobility thus becomes a key governing strategy as it is re-signified as constitutive of freedom and prevents worker organization (22). The ascendance of the social worker transforms class struggle and requires new theoretical tools (35). Immaterial labor is the labor of the social worker, who finds herself increasingly enmeshed within digital networks and flows of information. On the topic of immaterial labor, Negri mobilizes Marx’s concept of real subsumption to extend Michel Foucault’s analysis of neoliberalism’s production of the “entrepreneur of the self.” Post-","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"44 1","pages":"654 - 656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Beckenhauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2022.2146290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Antonio Negri’s Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context (2022) is the first installment of a planned trilogy. This work collects Negri’s foundational texts and recent talks relating to his theoretical interventions on operaismo or workerism. The book contains three parts. The first theorizes the formation of what Negri calls the social worker, emphasizing the importance of cognitive labor, and the processes of subjectivation as a response to worker upheavals with three essays published between 1974 and 1992. The second section, “Workers and Capital Today,” investigates contemporary alterations in class composition. Negri here uses the concept of immaterial labor, as well as Karl Marx’s notions of the general intellect and real subsumption. Finally, in the third section, “Polemical Considerations,” Negri strongly opposes the “post” in so-called post-operaismo and reflects on his own political break with Mario Tronti. This break, Negri suggests, came down to Tronti’s calculation that national political sovereignty is required to tame transnational capital. Negri theorizes transformations in labor since the 1960s. He argues that changes in labor after ‘1968’ can primarily be understood as a reaction by capital to worker militancy. The production and modulation of subjectivity takes on greater focus as labor becomes more collaborative, non-repetitive, and integrated alongside information technologies. Negri compares what he calls the “mass” worker—whom he associates with Taylorism’s labor process, Fordism’s working-day and wage relation, and Keynesian state intervention (14–15)—to the social worker, who takes form following the social protests symbolized by the year 1968. For him, the end of the Bretton Woods system and the 1973 oil crisis informed capital’s reaction to worker upheaval. Mobility thus becomes a key governing strategy as it is re-signified as constitutive of freedom and prevents worker organization (22). The ascendance of the social worker transforms class struggle and requires new theoretical tools (35). Immaterial labor is the labor of the social worker, who finds herself increasingly enmeshed within digital networks and flows of information. On the topic of immaterial labor, Negri mobilizes Marx’s concept of real subsumption to extend Michel Foucault’s analysis of neoliberalism’s production of the “entrepreneur of the self.” Post-\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"654 - 656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2146290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2146290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

安东尼奥·内格里的《运动中的马克思:语境中的歌剧主义》(2022)是计划中的三部曲的第一部。这部作品收集了奈格里的基础文本和最近关于他对歌剧或工人主义的理论干预的谈话。这本书包括三个部分。第一篇文章在1974年至1992年间发表了三篇文章,对内格里所说的社会工作者的形成进行了理论化,强调了认知劳动的重要性,以及作为对工人动荡的回应的主观化过程。第二部分,“今天的工人和资本”,调查当代阶级构成的变化。内格里在这里使用了非物质劳动的概念,以及卡尔·马克思关于一般智力和真正包容的概念。最后,在第三节“Polchemical Considerations”中,内格里强烈反对所谓后歌剧中的“后”,并反思了他自己与马里奥·特隆蒂的政治决裂。Negri认为,这种突破可以归结为Tronti的计算,即驯服跨国资本需要国家政治主权。内格里将20世纪60年代以来的劳动变革理论化。他认为,1968年后劳动力的变化主要可以理解为资本对工人好斗的反应。随着劳动与信息技术变得更加协作、非重复和集成,主体性的生产和调节变得更加重要。内格里将他所称的“大众”工人——他将其与泰勒主义的劳动过程、福特主义的工作日和工资关系以及凯恩斯主义的国家干预联系在一起(14-15)——与社会工作者进行了比较,后者在1968年象征性的社会抗议之后形成。对他来说,布雷顿森林体系的终结和1973年的石油危机影响了资本对工人剧变的反应。因此,流动性成为一种关键的管理策略,因为它被重新标记为自由的组成部分,并阻止工人组织(22)。社会工作者的崛起改变了阶级斗争,需要新的理论工具(35)。非物质劳动是社会工作者的劳动,他们发现自己越来越多地融入数字网络和信息流中。在非物质劳动的主题上,奈格里调动了马克思的真实包容概念,扩展了米歇尔·福柯对新自由主义产生“自我企业家”的分析-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context
Antonio Negri’s Marx in Movement: Operaismo in Context (2022) is the first installment of a planned trilogy. This work collects Negri’s foundational texts and recent talks relating to his theoretical interventions on operaismo or workerism. The book contains three parts. The first theorizes the formation of what Negri calls the social worker, emphasizing the importance of cognitive labor, and the processes of subjectivation as a response to worker upheavals with three essays published between 1974 and 1992. The second section, “Workers and Capital Today,” investigates contemporary alterations in class composition. Negri here uses the concept of immaterial labor, as well as Karl Marx’s notions of the general intellect and real subsumption. Finally, in the third section, “Polemical Considerations,” Negri strongly opposes the “post” in so-called post-operaismo and reflects on his own political break with Mario Tronti. This break, Negri suggests, came down to Tronti’s calculation that national political sovereignty is required to tame transnational capital. Negri theorizes transformations in labor since the 1960s. He argues that changes in labor after ‘1968’ can primarily be understood as a reaction by capital to worker militancy. The production and modulation of subjectivity takes on greater focus as labor becomes more collaborative, non-repetitive, and integrated alongside information technologies. Negri compares what he calls the “mass” worker—whom he associates with Taylorism’s labor process, Fordism’s working-day and wage relation, and Keynesian state intervention (14–15)—to the social worker, who takes form following the social protests symbolized by the year 1968. For him, the end of the Bretton Woods system and the 1973 oil crisis informed capital’s reaction to worker upheaval. Mobility thus becomes a key governing strategy as it is re-signified as constitutive of freedom and prevents worker organization (22). The ascendance of the social worker transforms class struggle and requires new theoretical tools (35). Immaterial labor is the labor of the social worker, who finds herself increasingly enmeshed within digital networks and flows of information. On the topic of immaterial labor, Negri mobilizes Marx’s concept of real subsumption to extend Michel Foucault’s analysis of neoliberalism’s production of the “entrepreneur of the self.” Post-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信