关键审计事项的报告是否影响非专业投资者对审计师可信度、信息超载、审计质量和投资风险的看法?

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Brian Carver, Leah Muriel, Brad S. Trinkle
{"title":"关键审计事项的报告是否影响非专业投资者对审计师可信度、信息超载、审计质量和投资风险的看法?","authors":"Brian Carver, Leah Muriel, Brad S. Trinkle","doi":"10.2308/bria-19-031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standard requires the reporting of critical audit matters (CAMs) within the audit report. This change has lengthened the audit report but may provide investors with cues about auditor credibility and audit quality. Utilizing an experiment and 140 nonprofessional investors, we find evidence that the disclosure of a CAM improves perceived auditor credibility, but the disclosure also has the unintended consequence of increasing feelings of information overload. More importantly, the disclosure of a CAM has a significant, positive total effect on perceived audit quality. This effect, in turn, lowers investors’ perceptions of investment risk. These findings highlight the potential for CAMs to impact investor perceptions and, possibly, subsequent decision making.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request.","PeriodicalId":46356,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Reporting of Critical Audit Matters Affect Nonprofessional Investors’ Perceptions of Auditor Credibility, Information Overload, Audit Quality, and Investment Risk?\",\"authors\":\"Brian Carver, Leah Muriel, Brad S. Trinkle\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/bria-19-031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standard requires the reporting of critical audit matters (CAMs) within the audit report. This change has lengthened the audit report but may provide investors with cues about auditor credibility and audit quality. Utilizing an experiment and 140 nonprofessional investors, we find evidence that the disclosure of a CAM improves perceived auditor credibility, but the disclosure also has the unintended consequence of increasing feelings of information overload. More importantly, the disclosure of a CAM has a significant, positive total effect on perceived audit quality. This effect, in turn, lowers investors’ perceptions of investment risk. These findings highlight the potential for CAMs to impact investor perceptions and, possibly, subsequent decision making.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Research in Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Research in Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-19-031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-19-031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的上市公司会计监督委员会(PCAOB)标准要求在审计报告中报告关键审计事项(CAMs)。这一变化延长了审计报告的长度,但可能为投资者提供有关审计师可信度和审计质量的线索。通过对140名非专业投资者的实验,我们发现了证据,证明CAM的披露提高了审计师的可信度,但披露也有意想不到的后果,即增加了信息过载的感觉。更重要的是,CAM的披露对感知审计质量具有显著的、积极的总体影响。这种效应反过来又降低了投资者对投资风险的认知。这些发现强调了CAMs影响投资者看法的潜力,并可能影响随后的决策。数据可用性:数据可根据要求从作者处获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Reporting of Critical Audit Matters Affect Nonprofessional Investors’ Perceptions of Auditor Credibility, Information Overload, Audit Quality, and Investment Risk?
A new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standard requires the reporting of critical audit matters (CAMs) within the audit report. This change has lengthened the audit report but may provide investors with cues about auditor credibility and audit quality. Utilizing an experiment and 140 nonprofessional investors, we find evidence that the disclosure of a CAM improves perceived auditor credibility, but the disclosure also has the unintended consequence of increasing feelings of information overload. More importantly, the disclosure of a CAM has a significant, positive total effect on perceived audit quality. This effect, in turn, lowers investors’ perceptions of investment risk. These findings highlight the potential for CAMs to impact investor perceptions and, possibly, subsequent decision making. Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信