私有化的国家和我们自己的国家

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1080/13698230.2022.2133830

Emma Saunders-Hastings

{"title":"私有化的国家和我们自己的国家","authors":"Emma Saunders-Hastings","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2022.2133830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Chiara Cordelli’s The Privatized State offers a powerful critique of privatization and an inspiring vision of the kind of democratic governance that could secure citizens’ equal freedom. This essay raises questions about how Cordelli’s arguments apply in non-ideal theory. It asks whether her arguments about the illegitimacy of privatization provide us with adequate reasons to reject ongoing processes of privatization. It also queries some of her recommendations for how philanthropy should be practiced by individuals and incentivized by the state.","PeriodicalId":46451,"journal":{"name":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","volume":"26 1","pages":"260 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The privatized state and our own\",\"authors\":\"Emma Saunders-Hastings\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698230.2022.2133830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Chiara Cordelli’s The Privatized State offers a powerful critique of privatization and an inspiring vision of the kind of democratic governance that could secure citizens’ equal freedom. This essay raises questions about how Cordelli’s arguments apply in non-ideal theory. It asks whether her arguments about the illegitimacy of privatization provide us with adequate reasons to reject ongoing processes of privatization. It also queries some of her recommendations for how philanthropy should be practiced by individuals and incentivized by the state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"260 - 266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2133830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2133830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

基娅拉·科德利的《私有化的国家》对私有化提出了强有力的批评，并对能够确保公民平等自由的民主治理提出了鼓舞人心的愿景。本文提出了如何将科德利的论点应用于非理想理论的问题。它询问她关于私有化非法性的论点是否为我们提供了充分的理由来拒绝正在进行的私有化进程。文章还质疑了她关于个人应该如何从事慈善事业、国家应该如何激励慈善事业的一些建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The privatized state and our own

ABSTRACT Chiara Cordelli’s The Privatized State offers a powerful critique of privatization and an inspiring vision of the kind of democratic governance that could secure citizens’ equal freedom. This essay raises questions about how Cordelli’s arguments apply in non-ideal theory. It asks whether her arguments about the illegitimacy of privatization provide us with adequate reasons to reject ongoing processes of privatization. It also queries some of her recommendations for how philanthropy should be practiced by individuals and incentivized by the state.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量