从18年实施管理有效性跟踪工具(METT)的经验教训:METT开发人员和实现者的视角

Q1 Environmental Science

Parks Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.parks-25-2ss.en

S. Stolton, N. Dudley, A. Belokurov, M. Deguignet, N. Burgess, M. Hockings, Fiona Leverington, K. Mackinnon, Llewellyn Young

{"title":"从18年实施管理有效性跟踪工具(METT)的经验教训:METT开发人员和实现者的视角","authors":"S. Stolton, N. Dudley, A. Belokurov, M. Deguignet, N. Burgess, M. Hockings, Fiona Leverington, K. Mackinnon, Llewellyn Young","doi":"10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.parks-25-2ss.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the successes and failures of management of protected areas is vital for the conservation of global biodiversity. The Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) is a simple, questionnaire-based approach for assessing protected area management effectiveness (PAME). Since it was developed in 1999, it has become the most widely applied PAME tool, used in at least 127 countries worldwide. This paper reviews the development of the METT and how it has been implemented and adapted. A combination of literature review on implementation and implementation experience from the original authors and key users of the METT confirms that the METT is a relatively quick and simple way of collecting information about the status and trends of management in protected areas, and provides information to help drive management improvements. As such it is suitable for protected area managers, national protected area agencies, donors, and NGOs aiming to improve area management, and as a component of national reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The paper examines issues related to METT implementation and concludes with 12 recommendations, from using the METT to verification of results, which together help ensure the tool is implemented in the most effective way and improves the credibility of PAME assessments.","PeriodicalId":37571,"journal":{"name":"Parks","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons learned from 18 years of implementing the Management Effectiveness Tracking\\n Tool (METT): A perspective from the METT developers and implementers\",\"authors\":\"S. Stolton, N. Dudley, A. Belokurov, M. Deguignet, N. Burgess, M. Hockings, Fiona Leverington, K. Mackinnon, Llewellyn Young\",\"doi\":\"10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.parks-25-2ss.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the successes and failures of management of protected areas is vital for the conservation of global biodiversity. The Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) is a simple, questionnaire-based approach for assessing protected area management effectiveness (PAME). Since it was developed in 1999, it has become the most widely applied PAME tool, used in at least 127 countries worldwide. This paper reviews the development of the METT and how it has been implemented and adapted. A combination of literature review on implementation and implementation experience from the original authors and key users of the METT confirms that the METT is a relatively quick and simple way of collecting information about the status and trends of management in protected areas, and provides information to help drive management improvements. As such it is suitable for protected area managers, national protected area agencies, donors, and NGOs aiming to improve area management, and as a component of national reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The paper examines issues related to METT implementation and concludes with 12 recommendations, from using the METT to verification of results, which together help ensure the tool is implemented in the most effective way and improves the credibility of PAME assessments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parks\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.parks-25-2ss.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.parks-25-2ss.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

了解保护区管理的成功和失败对保护全球生物多样性至关重要。管理有效性跟踪工具(METT)是一种基于问卷的简单方法，用于评估保护区管理有效性(PAME)。自1999年开发以来，它已成为应用最广泛的PAME工具，在全球至少127个国家使用。本文回顾了METT的发展以及它是如何实施和调整的。通过对METT实施的文献综述和来自METT原作者和主要用户的实施经验的结合，证实了METT是一种相对快速和简单的收集保护区管理现状和趋势信息的方法，并提供有助于推动管理改进的信息。因此，它适用于保护区管理者、国家保护区机构、捐助者和旨在改善保护区管理的非政府组织，并作为国家向《生物多样性公约》报告的一个组成部分。本文研究了与METT实施相关的问题，并提出了从使用METT到结果验证的12项建议，这些建议有助于确保以最有效的方式实施该工具，并提高PAME评估的可信度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Lessons learned from 18 years of implementing the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT): A perspective from the METT developers and implementers

Understanding the successes and failures of management of protected areas is vital for the conservation of global biodiversity. The Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) is a simple, questionnaire-based approach for assessing protected area management effectiveness (PAME). Since it was developed in 1999, it has become the most widely applied PAME tool, used in at least 127 countries worldwide. This paper reviews the development of the METT and how it has been implemented and adapted. A combination of literature review on implementation and implementation experience from the original authors and key users of the METT confirms that the METT is a relatively quick and simple way of collecting information about the status and trends of management in protected areas, and provides information to help drive management improvements. As such it is suitable for protected area managers, national protected area agencies, donors, and NGOs aiming to improve area management, and as a component of national reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The paper examines issues related to METT implementation and concludes with 12 recommendations, from using the METT to verification of results, which together help ensure the tool is implemented in the most effective way and improves the credibility of PAME assessments.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Parks Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： We aim for PARKS to be a rigorous, challenging publication with high academic credibility and standing. But at the same time the journal is and should remain primarily a resource for people actively involved in establishing and managing protected areas, under any management category or governance type. We aim for the majority of papers accepted to include practical management information. We also work hard to include authors who are involved in management but do not usually find the time to report the results of their research and experience to a wider audience. We welcome submissions from people whose written English is imperfect as long as they have interesting research to report, backed up by firm evidence, and are happy to work with authors to develop papers for the journal. PARKS is published with the aim of strengthening international collaboration in protected area development and management by: • promoting understanding of the values and benefits derived from protected areas to governments, communities, visitors, business etc; • ensuring that protected areas fulfil their primary role in nature conservation while addressing critical issues such as ecologically sustainable development, social justice and climate change adaptation and mitigation; • serving as a leading global forum for the exchange of information on issues relating to protected areas, especially learning from case studies of applied ideas; • publishing articles reporting on recent applied research that is relevant to protected area management; • changing and improving protected area management, policy environment and socio-economic benefits through use of information provided in the journal; and • promoting IUCN’s work on protected areas.