探索NBA的灌篮策略:对休息健康球员的实证分析

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Hua Gong, N. Watanabe, B. Soebbing, Matthew T. Brown, M. Nagel
{"title":"探索NBA的灌篮策略:对休息健康球员的实证分析","authors":"Hua Gong, N. Watanabe, B. Soebbing, Matthew T. Brown, M. Nagel","doi":"10.1080/14413523.2021.1970972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To date, a number of research studies have examined sport leagues for potential evidence of teams strategically losing games on purpose. Following tournament theory, it is believed sport teams will engage in such practices, often called tanking, in order to gain rewards in the form of better draft picks. Where prior research typically focused on detecting evidence of underperformance by teams, the present research analyzed one possible tanking strategy – the resting of healthy players. Specifically using data from National Basketball Association regular season games from the 2006–07 to 2017–18 seasons, we develop a count model of the number of players who are rested by teams. Furthermore, we utilize a natural experiment to consider whether teams eliminated from playoff contention rest more players. Poisson regression estimates found that eliminated teams will rest more players than others, and that the number of players rested by eliminated teams will increase as the competition for draft picks increases. As such, this study is one of the first to show how teams are able to purposefully lose games, with the strategy being instituted through managerial decisions rather than shirking by workers. HIGHLIGHTS This paper examines whether NBA teams rest healthy players in order to underperform. Poisson regression estimates find that eliminated teams will rest more players. The number of players rested increases when more teams are tied in the standings. Results align with tournament theory in that teams expend losing effort to gain rewards. Findings suggest NBA teams strategical rest players to improve their position in the draft.","PeriodicalId":48057,"journal":{"name":"Sport Management Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"546 - 566"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring tanking strategies in the NBA: an empirical analysis of resting healthy players\",\"authors\":\"Hua Gong, N. Watanabe, B. Soebbing, Matthew T. Brown, M. Nagel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14413523.2021.1970972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT To date, a number of research studies have examined sport leagues for potential evidence of teams strategically losing games on purpose. Following tournament theory, it is believed sport teams will engage in such practices, often called tanking, in order to gain rewards in the form of better draft picks. Where prior research typically focused on detecting evidence of underperformance by teams, the present research analyzed one possible tanking strategy – the resting of healthy players. Specifically using data from National Basketball Association regular season games from the 2006–07 to 2017–18 seasons, we develop a count model of the number of players who are rested by teams. Furthermore, we utilize a natural experiment to consider whether teams eliminated from playoff contention rest more players. Poisson regression estimates found that eliminated teams will rest more players than others, and that the number of players rested by eliminated teams will increase as the competition for draft picks increases. As such, this study is one of the first to show how teams are able to purposefully lose games, with the strategy being instituted through managerial decisions rather than shirking by workers. HIGHLIGHTS This paper examines whether NBA teams rest healthy players in order to underperform. Poisson regression estimates find that eliminated teams will rest more players. The number of players rested increases when more teams are tied in the standings. Results align with tournament theory in that teams expend losing effort to gain rewards. Findings suggest NBA teams strategical rest players to improve their position in the draft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sport Management Review\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"546 - 566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sport Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1970972\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1970972","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要到目前为止,许多研究已经对体育联盟进行了调查,以寻找球队故意战略性输掉比赛的潜在证据。根据锦标赛理论,人们相信运动队会进行这种练习,通常被称为“灌篮”,以获得更好的选秀权形式的奖励。之前的研究通常侧重于检测球队表现不佳的证据,而现在的研究分析了一种可能的失误策略——让健康球员休息。具体使用美国国家篮球协会2006–07至2017–18赛季常规赛的数据,我们开发了一个球队休息球员人数的统计模型。此外,我们利用一个自然实验来考虑被季后赛淘汰的球队是否会让更多的球员休息。泊松回归估计发现,被淘汰的球队将比其他球队休息更多的球员,被淘汰球队休息的球员数量将随着选秀权竞争的增加而增加。因此,这项研究是第一批表明球队如何有目的地输掉比赛的研究之一,这种策略是通过管理决策制定的,而不是由员工推卸责任。亮点本文考察了NBA球队是否为了表现不佳而让健康的球员休息。泊松回归估计发现,被淘汰的球队会让更多的球员休息。当更多的球队在积分榜上打平时,休息的球员数量就会增加。结果与锦标赛理论一致,即球队花费失败的努力来获得奖励。研究结果表明,NBA球队战略性地让球员休息,以提高他们在选秀中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring tanking strategies in the NBA: an empirical analysis of resting healthy players
ABSTRACT To date, a number of research studies have examined sport leagues for potential evidence of teams strategically losing games on purpose. Following tournament theory, it is believed sport teams will engage in such practices, often called tanking, in order to gain rewards in the form of better draft picks. Where prior research typically focused on detecting evidence of underperformance by teams, the present research analyzed one possible tanking strategy – the resting of healthy players. Specifically using data from National Basketball Association regular season games from the 2006–07 to 2017–18 seasons, we develop a count model of the number of players who are rested by teams. Furthermore, we utilize a natural experiment to consider whether teams eliminated from playoff contention rest more players. Poisson regression estimates found that eliminated teams will rest more players than others, and that the number of players rested by eliminated teams will increase as the competition for draft picks increases. As such, this study is one of the first to show how teams are able to purposefully lose games, with the strategy being instituted through managerial decisions rather than shirking by workers. HIGHLIGHTS This paper examines whether NBA teams rest healthy players in order to underperform. Poisson regression estimates find that eliminated teams will rest more players. The number of players rested increases when more teams are tied in the standings. Results align with tournament theory in that teams expend losing effort to gain rewards. Findings suggest NBA teams strategical rest players to improve their position in the draft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Sport Management Review is published as a service to sport industries worldwide. It is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with the management, marketing, and governance of sport at all levels and in all its manifestations -- whether as an entertainment, a recreation, or an occupation. The journal encourages collaboration between scholars and practitioners. It welcomes submissions reporting research, new applications, advances in theory, and case studies. The language of publication is English. Submissions are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信