基本关键课程对卢旺达知识获取的影响

IF 0.8 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
D. Hopkinson, K. Akuamoah-Boateng, P. Banguti, J. P. Mvukiyehe, C. Zerfoss, T. Eng, E. Tuyishime, K. Hertel, D. Starling, A. Bethea, B. Moses, A. Syed
{"title":"基本关键课程对卢旺达知识获取的影响","authors":"D. Hopkinson, K. Akuamoah-Boateng, P. Banguti, J. P. Mvukiyehe, C. Zerfoss, T. Eng, E. Tuyishime, K. Hertel, D. Starling, A. Bethea, B. Moses, A. Syed","doi":"10.7196/sajcc.2022.v38i1.491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Emerging critical care systems have gained little attention in low- and middle-income countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, only 4% of the healthcare workforce is trained in critical care, and mortality rates are unacceptably high in this patient population. Objectives We sought to retrospectively describe the knowledge acquisition and confidence improvement of practitioners who attend the Fundamental Critical Care Support (FCCS) course in Rwanda. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in which we assessed survey data and multiple-choice question data that were collected before and after course delivery. The purpose of these assessments at the time of delivery was to evaluate participants’ perception and acquisition of critical care knowledge. Results Thirty-six interprofessional clinicians completed the training. Performance on the multiple-choice questions improved overall after the course (mean score pre-course of 56.5% to mean score post-course of 65.8%, p-value <0.001) and improved in all content areas with the exception of diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome and acute respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation. Both physicians and nurses improved their scores significantly (68.9% to 75.6%, p-value = 0.031 and 52.0% to 63.5%, p-value <0.001, respectively). Self-reported confidence in level of knowledge also increased in all areas. Survey respondents indicated on open-answer questions that they would like the course offerings at least annually, and that further dissemination of the course in Rwanda was warranted. Conclusion Deploying the established FCCS course improved Rwandan healthcare provider knowledge and confidence across most critical care content areas. Therefore, this course represents a good first step in bridging the gaps noted in emerging critical care systems. Contributions of the study Critical care education in sub-Saharan Africa is limited and few staff have formal training. The aim of the study was to determine whether a focused course delivered in Rwanda on critical care management improved knowledge in key areas. Our retrospective study on results from a multiple choice question test and survey indicate that short courses may improve knowledge of critical care management.","PeriodicalId":42653,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the Fundamental Critical Course on knowledge acquisition in Rwanda\",\"authors\":\"D. Hopkinson, K. Akuamoah-Boateng, P. Banguti, J. P. Mvukiyehe, C. Zerfoss, T. Eng, E. Tuyishime, K. Hertel, D. Starling, A. Bethea, B. Moses, A. Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/sajcc.2022.v38i1.491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Emerging critical care systems have gained little attention in low- and middle-income countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, only 4% of the healthcare workforce is trained in critical care, and mortality rates are unacceptably high in this patient population. Objectives We sought to retrospectively describe the knowledge acquisition and confidence improvement of practitioners who attend the Fundamental Critical Care Support (FCCS) course in Rwanda. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in which we assessed survey data and multiple-choice question data that were collected before and after course delivery. The purpose of these assessments at the time of delivery was to evaluate participants’ perception and acquisition of critical care knowledge. Results Thirty-six interprofessional clinicians completed the training. Performance on the multiple-choice questions improved overall after the course (mean score pre-course of 56.5% to mean score post-course of 65.8%, p-value <0.001) and improved in all content areas with the exception of diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome and acute respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation. Both physicians and nurses improved their scores significantly (68.9% to 75.6%, p-value = 0.031 and 52.0% to 63.5%, p-value <0.001, respectively). Self-reported confidence in level of knowledge also increased in all areas. Survey respondents indicated on open-answer questions that they would like the course offerings at least annually, and that further dissemination of the course in Rwanda was warranted. Conclusion Deploying the established FCCS course improved Rwandan healthcare provider knowledge and confidence across most critical care content areas. Therefore, this course represents a good first step in bridging the gaps noted in emerging critical care systems. Contributions of the study Critical care education in sub-Saharan Africa is limited and few staff have formal training. The aim of the study was to determine whether a focused course delivered in Rwanda on critical care management improved knowledge in key areas. Our retrospective study on results from a multiple choice question test and survey indicate that short courses may improve knowledge of critical care management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajcc.2022.v38i1.491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajcc.2022.v38i1.491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景新兴的重症监护系统在中低收入国家很少受到关注。在撒哈拉以南非洲,只有4%的医护人员接受过重症监护培训,而这一患者群体的死亡率高得令人无法接受。目的我们试图回顾性描述在卢旺达参加基础重症监护支持(FCCS)课程的从业者的知识获取和信心提高。方法我们进行了一项回顾性研究,评估了课程交付前后收集的调查数据和多项选择题数据。在分娩时进行这些评估的目的是评估参与者对重症监护知识的感知和获取。结果36名跨专业临床医生完成了培训。课程结束后,多项选择题的表现总体上有所改善(课程前平均得分为56.5%,课程后平均得分为65.8%,p值<0.001),除急性冠状动脉综合征和急性呼吸衰竭/机械通气的诊断和管理外,所有内容领域的表现都有所改善。医生和护士的得分都有显著提高(分别为68.9%至75.6%,p值=0.031和52.0%至63.5%,p值<0.001)。自我报告的对所有领域知识水平的信心也有所提高。调查对象在公开回答的问题中表示,他们希望至少每年提供一次课程,并且有必要在卢旺达进一步传播该课程。结论部署已建立的FCCS课程提高了卢旺达医疗保健提供者在大多数重症监护内容领域的知识和信心。因此,这门课程代表着弥合新兴重症监护系统中存在的差距的良好第一步。该研究对撒哈拉以南非洲重症监护教育的贡献有限,很少有工作人员接受过正式培训。这项研究的目的是确定在卢旺达开设的重症监护管理重点课程是否提高了关键领域的知识。我们对多项选择题测试和调查结果的回顾性研究表明,短期课程可以提高重症监护管理的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of the Fundamental Critical Course on knowledge acquisition in Rwanda
Background Emerging critical care systems have gained little attention in low- and middle-income countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, only 4% of the healthcare workforce is trained in critical care, and mortality rates are unacceptably high in this patient population. Objectives We sought to retrospectively describe the knowledge acquisition and confidence improvement of practitioners who attend the Fundamental Critical Care Support (FCCS) course in Rwanda. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in which we assessed survey data and multiple-choice question data that were collected before and after course delivery. The purpose of these assessments at the time of delivery was to evaluate participants’ perception and acquisition of critical care knowledge. Results Thirty-six interprofessional clinicians completed the training. Performance on the multiple-choice questions improved overall after the course (mean score pre-course of 56.5% to mean score post-course of 65.8%, p-value <0.001) and improved in all content areas with the exception of diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome and acute respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation. Both physicians and nurses improved their scores significantly (68.9% to 75.6%, p-value = 0.031 and 52.0% to 63.5%, p-value <0.001, respectively). Self-reported confidence in level of knowledge also increased in all areas. Survey respondents indicated on open-answer questions that they would like the course offerings at least annually, and that further dissemination of the course in Rwanda was warranted. Conclusion Deploying the established FCCS course improved Rwandan healthcare provider knowledge and confidence across most critical care content areas. Therefore, this course represents a good first step in bridging the gaps noted in emerging critical care systems. Contributions of the study Critical care education in sub-Saharan Africa is limited and few staff have formal training. The aim of the study was to determine whether a focused course delivered in Rwanda on critical care management improved knowledge in key areas. Our retrospective study on results from a multiple choice question test and survey indicate that short courses may improve knowledge of critical care management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes scientific articles related to multidisciplinary critical and intensive medical care and the emergency care of critically ill humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信