{"title":"知识密集型商业服务和商业模式:小型私营医疗保健提供商的定性比较分析","authors":"Guillermo Navarro Sanfelix, Francisco Puig","doi":"10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" In recent years, companies operating in activities such as dentistry, optometry, physiotherapy, or veterinary have seen the demand for their services grow. Their customers do not require their services only for health reasons but also for aesthetics and welfare issues. As a result, these companies compete in expanding and profitable markets. However, this business context has been detected by many professional entrepreneurs who decided to run their activity in healthcare and set up a firm without the necessary assets and knowledge. To overcome these liabilities, some seek partners who provide them with the resources they do not have by entering into different alliances. In contrast, others choose to compete under an independent business model. This paper sheds light on the factors influencing the decisions about the implemented business model in small knowledge-intensive firms by examining the association between the perception of the institutional environment variables and the dotation of intangible resources. For that purpose, a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was performed. Due to government regulations in force in these sectors, and methodological reasons, the study sample consisted of 88 small Spanish firms (less than 15 employees). The data were collected by a questionnaire distributed in 2017. We find that the choice to remain self-governing or to enter into a partnership (e.g franchising) is heterogeneously motivated by the evaluations that entrepreneurs have about the role of institutions concerning their activities and how high they consider their intellectual capital compared to their main competitors. In terms of institutional capital, these entrepreneurs refuse to implement patient loyalty policies and strive to have high-quality human capital in terms of the training & experience of their professionals. Moreover, the results also showed that independent business models pay little attention to market influences and view a certain level of regulation favorably, suggesting vocational and conservative behavior","PeriodicalId":38532,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Business Models: a Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Small Private Healthcare Providers\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Navarro Sanfelix, Francisco Puig\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" In recent years, companies operating in activities such as dentistry, optometry, physiotherapy, or veterinary have seen the demand for their services grow. Their customers do not require their services only for health reasons but also for aesthetics and welfare issues. As a result, these companies compete in expanding and profitable markets. However, this business context has been detected by many professional entrepreneurs who decided to run their activity in healthcare and set up a firm without the necessary assets and knowledge. To overcome these liabilities, some seek partners who provide them with the resources they do not have by entering into different alliances. In contrast, others choose to compete under an independent business model. This paper sheds light on the factors influencing the decisions about the implemented business model in small knowledge-intensive firms by examining the association between the perception of the institutional environment variables and the dotation of intangible resources. For that purpose, a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was performed. Due to government regulations in force in these sectors, and methodological reasons, the study sample consisted of 88 small Spanish firms (less than 15 employees). The data were collected by a questionnaire distributed in 2017. We find that the choice to remain self-governing or to enter into a partnership (e.g franchising) is heterogeneously motivated by the evaluations that entrepreneurs have about the role of institutions concerning their activities and how high they consider their intellectual capital compared to their main competitors. In terms of institutional capital, these entrepreneurs refuse to implement patient loyalty policies and strive to have high-quality human capital in terms of the training & experience of their professionals. Moreover, the results also showed that independent business models pay little attention to market influences and view a certain level of regulation favorably, suggesting vocational and conservative behavior\",\"PeriodicalId\":38532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.20.3.2579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Business Models: a Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Small Private Healthcare Providers
In recent years, companies operating in activities such as dentistry, optometry, physiotherapy, or veterinary have seen the demand for their services grow. Their customers do not require their services only for health reasons but also for aesthetics and welfare issues. As a result, these companies compete in expanding and profitable markets. However, this business context has been detected by many professional entrepreneurs who decided to run their activity in healthcare and set up a firm without the necessary assets and knowledge. To overcome these liabilities, some seek partners who provide them with the resources they do not have by entering into different alliances. In contrast, others choose to compete under an independent business model. This paper sheds light on the factors influencing the decisions about the implemented business model in small knowledge-intensive firms by examining the association between the perception of the institutional environment variables and the dotation of intangible resources. For that purpose, a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was performed. Due to government regulations in force in these sectors, and methodological reasons, the study sample consisted of 88 small Spanish firms (less than 15 employees). The data were collected by a questionnaire distributed in 2017. We find that the choice to remain self-governing or to enter into a partnership (e.g franchising) is heterogeneously motivated by the evaluations that entrepreneurs have about the role of institutions concerning their activities and how high they consider their intellectual capital compared to their main competitors. In terms of institutional capital, these entrepreneurs refuse to implement patient loyalty policies and strive to have high-quality human capital in terms of the training & experience of their professionals. Moreover, the results also showed that independent business models pay little attention to market influences and view a certain level of regulation favorably, suggesting vocational and conservative behavior
期刊介绍:
The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods (EJBRM) provides perspectives on topics relevant to research methods applied in the field of business and management. Through its publication the journal contributes to the development of theory and practice. The journal accepts academically robust papers that contribute to the area of research methods applied in business and management research. Papers submitted to the journal are double-blind reviewed by members of the reviewer committee or other suitably qualified readers. The Editor reserves the right to reject papers that, in the view of the editorial board, are either of insufficient quality, or are not relevant enough to the subject area. The editor is happy to discuss contributions before submission. The journal publishes work in the categories described below. Research Papers: These may be qualitative or quantitative, empirical or theoretical in nature and can discuss completed research findings or work in progress. Case Studies: Case studies are welcomed illustrating business and management research methods in practise. View Points: View points are less academically rigorous articles usually in areas of controversy which will fuel some interesting debate. Conference Reports and Book Reviews: Anyone who attends a conference or reads a book that they feel contributes to the area of Business Research Methods is encouraged to submit a review for publication.