{"title":"“生而不平等”:二十世纪末女权运动中的女性组织","authors":"Theresa M. Iker","doi":"10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The roots of the modern men’s rights movement can be traced back to 1960s agitation for divorce reform and later surges of fathers’ rights activism. An overlooked feature of the movement’s growth is the activism of women. Using organizational papers, press coverage, and advice literature, this article examines self-identified “second wives,” female activists married to men who first mobilized following acrimonious divorces and child custody battles. Second wives constituted a sizable minority of men’s rights movement membership and held key leadership roles. As with women’s activism in other conservative and antifeminist political movements throughout the late twentieth century, second wives responded to both their movement’s surface demands and, at a deeper level, a threatened gender order. Second wives’ vital organizing roles also made it possible for the men’s rights movement to gain public respectability, allowing its ideology to enter the mainstream by the mid-1990s.","PeriodicalId":45948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Womens History","volume":"35 1","pages":"51 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“All Wives are Not Created Equal”: Women Organizing in the Late Twentieth-Century Men’s Rights Movement\",\"authors\":\"Theresa M. Iker\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The roots of the modern men’s rights movement can be traced back to 1960s agitation for divorce reform and later surges of fathers’ rights activism. An overlooked feature of the movement’s growth is the activism of women. Using organizational papers, press coverage, and advice literature, this article examines self-identified “second wives,” female activists married to men who first mobilized following acrimonious divorces and child custody battles. Second wives constituted a sizable minority of men’s rights movement membership and held key leadership roles. As with women’s activism in other conservative and antifeminist political movements throughout the late twentieth century, second wives responded to both their movement’s surface demands and, at a deeper level, a threatened gender order. Second wives’ vital organizing roles also made it possible for the men’s rights movement to gain public respectability, allowing its ideology to enter the mainstream by the mid-1990s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Womens History\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Womens History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Womens History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
“All Wives are Not Created Equal”: Women Organizing in the Late Twentieth-Century Men’s Rights Movement
Abstract:The roots of the modern men’s rights movement can be traced back to 1960s agitation for divorce reform and later surges of fathers’ rights activism. An overlooked feature of the movement’s growth is the activism of women. Using organizational papers, press coverage, and advice literature, this article examines self-identified “second wives,” female activists married to men who first mobilized following acrimonious divorces and child custody battles. Second wives constituted a sizable minority of men’s rights movement membership and held key leadership roles. As with women’s activism in other conservative and antifeminist political movements throughout the late twentieth century, second wives responded to both their movement’s surface demands and, at a deeper level, a threatened gender order. Second wives’ vital organizing roles also made it possible for the men’s rights movement to gain public respectability, allowing its ideology to enter the mainstream by the mid-1990s.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Women"s History is the first journal devoted exclusively to the international field of women"s history. It does not attempt to impose one feminist "line" but recognizes the multiple perspectives captured by the term "feminisms." Its guiding principle is a belief that the divide between "women"s history" and "gender history" can be, and is, bridged by work on women that is sensitive to the particular historical constructions of gender that shape and are shaped by women"s experience.