“生而不平等”:二十世纪末女权运动中的女性组织

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Theresa M. Iker
{"title":"“生而不平等”:二十世纪末女权运动中的女性组织","authors":"Theresa M. Iker","doi":"10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The roots of the modern men’s rights movement can be traced back to 1960s agitation for divorce reform and later surges of fathers’ rights activism. An overlooked feature of the movement’s growth is the activism of women. Using organizational papers, press coverage, and advice literature, this article examines self-identified “second wives,” female activists married to men who first mobilized following acrimonious divorces and child custody battles. Second wives constituted a sizable minority of men’s rights movement membership and held key leadership roles. As with women’s activism in other conservative and antifeminist political movements throughout the late twentieth century, second wives responded to both their movement’s surface demands and, at a deeper level, a threatened gender order. Second wives’ vital organizing roles also made it possible for the men’s rights movement to gain public respectability, allowing its ideology to enter the mainstream by the mid-1990s.","PeriodicalId":45948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Womens History","volume":"35 1","pages":"51 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“All Wives are Not Created Equal”: Women Organizing in the Late Twentieth-Century Men’s Rights Movement\",\"authors\":\"Theresa M. Iker\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The roots of the modern men’s rights movement can be traced back to 1960s agitation for divorce reform and later surges of fathers’ rights activism. An overlooked feature of the movement’s growth is the activism of women. Using organizational papers, press coverage, and advice literature, this article examines self-identified “second wives,” female activists married to men who first mobilized following acrimonious divorces and child custody battles. Second wives constituted a sizable minority of men’s rights movement membership and held key leadership roles. As with women’s activism in other conservative and antifeminist political movements throughout the late twentieth century, second wives responded to both their movement’s surface demands and, at a deeper level, a threatened gender order. Second wives’ vital organizing roles also made it possible for the men’s rights movement to gain public respectability, allowing its ideology to enter the mainstream by the mid-1990s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Womens History\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Womens History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Womens History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2023.a899539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:现代男性权利运动的根源可以追溯到20世纪60年代的离婚改革运动和后来的父亲权利运动。该运动发展过程中被忽视的一个特点是妇女的积极性。这篇文章利用组织文件、新闻报道和咨询文献,审视了自称“第二任妻子”的女性活动家,她们嫁给了在激烈的离婚和孩子监护权争夺战后首次动员起来的男性。第二任妻子在男性权利运动成员中占相当大的少数,并发挥着关键的领导作用。与20世纪末其他保守派和反女权主义政治运动中的女性激进主义一样,第二任妻子既回应了她们运动的表面要求,也在更深层次上回应了受到威胁的性别秩序。第二任妻子的重要组织作用也使男性权利运动有可能获得公众的尊重,使其意识形态在20世纪90年代中期进入主流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“All Wives are Not Created Equal”: Women Organizing in the Late Twentieth-Century Men’s Rights Movement
Abstract:The roots of the modern men’s rights movement can be traced back to 1960s agitation for divorce reform and later surges of fathers’ rights activism. An overlooked feature of the movement’s growth is the activism of women. Using organizational papers, press coverage, and advice literature, this article examines self-identified “second wives,” female activists married to men who first mobilized following acrimonious divorces and child custody battles. Second wives constituted a sizable minority of men’s rights movement membership and held key leadership roles. As with women’s activism in other conservative and antifeminist political movements throughout the late twentieth century, second wives responded to both their movement’s surface demands and, at a deeper level, a threatened gender order. Second wives’ vital organizing roles also made it possible for the men’s rights movement to gain public respectability, allowing its ideology to enter the mainstream by the mid-1990s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Women"s History is the first journal devoted exclusively to the international field of women"s history. It does not attempt to impose one feminist "line" but recognizes the multiple perspectives captured by the term "feminisms." Its guiding principle is a belief that the divide between "women"s history" and "gender history" can be, and is, bridged by work on women that is sensitive to the particular historical constructions of gender that shape and are shaped by women"s experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信