北方备忘录的来源和贡献者及其继承者

IF 0.2 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Flint F. Johnson
{"title":"北方备忘录的来源和贡献者及其继承者","authors":"Flint F. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/00844276.2019.1624420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract From the moment the first scholars tried to understand the events of Britain during the fifth and early sixth centuries, two British historical documents have been central to their efforts, the Historia Brittonum and the Annales Cambriae, both of which contained entries from a non-extant but generally accepted common source — the Northern Memorandum. Logically, learning as much as possible about the exact nature of that source would be of great use in better understanding post-Roman Britain. To begin rectifying the situation this article will review what is known about the background of the Northern Memorandum, Historia Brittonum, and Annales Cambriae. It will then explore the Historia Brittonum’s chapters and revisions and do the same with the Annales Cambriae entries up until the last northern British note. In each case the individual source(s), motivations, and date-range will be discussed. This exercise will be followed by a short discussion of the findings and one hopes a better understanding of both the Northern Memorandum and its derivatives.","PeriodicalId":40237,"journal":{"name":"Yorkshire Archaeological Journal","volume":"91 1","pages":"111 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00844276.2019.1624420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sources and Contributors of the Northern Memorandum and its Heirs\",\"authors\":\"Flint F. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00844276.2019.1624420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract From the moment the first scholars tried to understand the events of Britain during the fifth and early sixth centuries, two British historical documents have been central to their efforts, the Historia Brittonum and the Annales Cambriae, both of which contained entries from a non-extant but generally accepted common source — the Northern Memorandum. Logically, learning as much as possible about the exact nature of that source would be of great use in better understanding post-Roman Britain. To begin rectifying the situation this article will review what is known about the background of the Northern Memorandum, Historia Brittonum, and Annales Cambriae. It will then explore the Historia Brittonum’s chapters and revisions and do the same with the Annales Cambriae entries up until the last northern British note. In each case the individual source(s), motivations, and date-range will be discussed. This exercise will be followed by a short discussion of the findings and one hopes a better understanding of both the Northern Memorandum and its derivatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yorkshire Archaeological Journal\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00844276.2019.1624420\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yorkshire Archaeological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00844276.2019.1624420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yorkshire Archaeological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00844276.2019.1624420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从第一批学者试图了解五世纪和六世纪早期英国事件的那刻起,两份英国历史文献就一直是他们努力的中心,《不列颠历史》和《寒武纪年历》,这两份文献都包含了一个不存在但被普遍接受的共同来源——《北方备忘录》的条目。从逻辑上讲,尽可能多地了解这一来源的确切性质,将有助于更好地理解后罗马时代的英国。为了纠正这种情况,本文将回顾《北方备忘录》、《不列颠历史》和《寒武纪年历》的背景。然后,它将探索《布里顿历史》的章节和修订版,并对《寒武纪年历》的条目进行同样的研究,直到最后一次英国北部的注释。在每种情况下,将讨论单个来源、动机和日期范围。这项工作之后将对调查结果进行简短的讨论,人们希望更好地理解北方备忘录及其衍生品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Sources and Contributors of the Northern Memorandum and its Heirs
Abstract From the moment the first scholars tried to understand the events of Britain during the fifth and early sixth centuries, two British historical documents have been central to their efforts, the Historia Brittonum and the Annales Cambriae, both of which contained entries from a non-extant but generally accepted common source — the Northern Memorandum. Logically, learning as much as possible about the exact nature of that source would be of great use in better understanding post-Roman Britain. To begin rectifying the situation this article will review what is known about the background of the Northern Memorandum, Historia Brittonum, and Annales Cambriae. It will then explore the Historia Brittonum’s chapters and revisions and do the same with the Annales Cambriae entries up until the last northern British note. In each case the individual source(s), motivations, and date-range will be discussed. This exercise will be followed by a short discussion of the findings and one hopes a better understanding of both the Northern Memorandum and its derivatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信