在网球比赛中,男子和女子的误判有什么不同吗?以2021年温布尔登锦标赛为例

IF 2.1 4区 教育学 Q1 Health Professions
J. Carboch, P. Praveckova, Otto Kolbinger
{"title":"在网球比赛中,男子和女子的误判有什么不同吗?以2021年温布尔登锦标赛为例","authors":"J. Carboch, P. Praveckova, Otto Kolbinger","doi":"10.1080/24748668.2023.2204683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Line umpires make quick decisions. Ball trajectories and mechanical characteristics (velocity, spin) are different for male and female events, which can affect the decision quality. The aim is to analyse patterns of line umpire errors at the Wimbledon 2021 with a particular focus on differences between men’s and women’s matches. Data were obtained from the official match reports from 290 matches where the Hawk-Eye system was used to determine the umpires’ calls and used to calculate descriptive statistics and to run different linear regression models. Line umpires made 1 error per 17.7 games, with a mean error size of 30 ± 39 mm. Error size on long lines (18 ± 24 mm) was smaller compared to cross lines (40 ± 45 mm), which also served as a significant predictor in all regression models. In women’s matches, we observed a 7 mm bigger mean error size, which was in particular caused by a significantly bigger average error size for erroneous “out” calls (12.2 mm), which could be supported by the regression models. These results help to understand human decision-making performance on the grass. To improve line umpiring, we suggest to put awareness about the nature of line umpire errors, which indeed indicates that the task differs between men’s and women’s matches.          ","PeriodicalId":49049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport","volume":"23 1","pages":"155 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do line call errors differ between men’s and women’s events in tennis? A case study from the 2021 Wimbledon Tournament\",\"authors\":\"J. Carboch, P. Praveckova, Otto Kolbinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24748668.2023.2204683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Line umpires make quick decisions. Ball trajectories and mechanical characteristics (velocity, spin) are different for male and female events, which can affect the decision quality. The aim is to analyse patterns of line umpire errors at the Wimbledon 2021 with a particular focus on differences between men’s and women’s matches. Data were obtained from the official match reports from 290 matches where the Hawk-Eye system was used to determine the umpires’ calls and used to calculate descriptive statistics and to run different linear regression models. Line umpires made 1 error per 17.7 games, with a mean error size of 30 ± 39 mm. Error size on long lines (18 ± 24 mm) was smaller compared to cross lines (40 ± 45 mm), which also served as a significant predictor in all regression models. In women’s matches, we observed a 7 mm bigger mean error size, which was in particular caused by a significantly bigger average error size for erroneous “out” calls (12.2 mm), which could be supported by the regression models. These results help to understand human decision-making performance on the grass. To improve line umpiring, we suggest to put awareness about the nature of line umpire errors, which indeed indicates that the task differs between men’s and women’s matches.          \",\"PeriodicalId\":49049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2023.2204683\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2023.2204683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

线裁判做出快速的决定。男女选手的球轨迹和机械特性(速度、旋转)不同,这会影响决策质量。目的是分析2021年温布尔登网球公开赛的线裁判错误模式,特别关注男女比赛之间的差异。数据来自290场比赛的官方比赛报告,其中鹰眼系统用于确定裁判的判罚,并用于计算描述性统计数据并运行不同的线性回归模型。线裁判每17.7场比赛出现1次失误,平均误差大小为30±39毫米。长线(18±24 mm)的误差小于交叉(40±45 mm),这也是所有回归模型的重要预测因子。在女子比赛中,我们观察到平均误差大小增加了7毫米,这主要是由于错误“出界”判罚的平均误差大小显著增加(12.2毫米),这可以得到回归模型的支持。这些结果有助于理解人类在草地上的决策表现。为了改善线裁判,我们建议提高对线裁判失误性质的认识,这确实表明了男女比赛的任务不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do line call errors differ between men’s and women’s events in tennis? A case study from the 2021 Wimbledon Tournament
ABSTRACT Line umpires make quick decisions. Ball trajectories and mechanical characteristics (velocity, spin) are different for male and female events, which can affect the decision quality. The aim is to analyse patterns of line umpire errors at the Wimbledon 2021 with a particular focus on differences between men’s and women’s matches. Data were obtained from the official match reports from 290 matches where the Hawk-Eye system was used to determine the umpires’ calls and used to calculate descriptive statistics and to run different linear regression models. Line umpires made 1 error per 17.7 games, with a mean error size of 30 ± 39 mm. Error size on long lines (18 ± 24 mm) was smaller compared to cross lines (40 ± 45 mm), which also served as a significant predictor in all regression models. In women’s matches, we observed a 7 mm bigger mean error size, which was in particular caused by a significantly bigger average error size for erroneous “out” calls (12.2 mm), which could be supported by the regression models. These results help to understand human decision-making performance on the grass. To improve line umpiring, we suggest to put awareness about the nature of line umpire errors, which indeed indicates that the task differs between men’s and women’s matches.          
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport aims to present current original research into sports performance. In so doing, the journal contributes to our general knowledge of sports performance making findings available to a wide audience of academics and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信