菲律宾社区康复中语言病理学远程康复的可行性研究

PJAHS Pub Date : 2022-02-15 DOI:10.36413/pjahs.0502.002
Joyce Anne Ponciano-Villafania, Ellary Grace Odtuhan, Carmela Tria, Jowillyn Capacite, Mykel Francesco Dequiña, Jelynna Noreen Alano, Beatrice Colleen Cajucom
{"title":"菲律宾社区康复中语言病理学远程康复的可行性研究","authors":"Joyce Anne Ponciano-Villafania, Ellary Grace Odtuhan, Carmela Tria, Jowillyn Capacite, Mykel Francesco Dequiña, Jelynna Noreen Alano, Beatrice Colleen Cajucom","doi":"10.36413/pjahs.0502.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Filipino speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can reach more persons with disabilities across 7,107 Philippine islands through telerehabilitation (also known as teletherapy, telepractice). This study described the feasibility of telerehabilitation for speech-language pathology in community-based rehabilitation in terms of appropriate information and communication technologies (ICT), stakeholder perspectives, and facilitators and barriers. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Participants were purposely selected as telerehabilitation stakeholders. One metropolitan-based SLP conducted remote and synchronous therapy sessions to two persons with voice disorders (52 and 65 years old) in their homes, assisted by one primary caregiver each and one community-based rehabilitation worker (CBRW). ICT observations were logged as field notes. Stakeholder perspectives were obtained through participant journals and interviews, thematically analyzed using NVIVO, and validated by participants. Facilitators and barriers were derived from data triangulation of field notes, journals, and interviews. Results: The best ICT comprised of fastest wireless internet available (7.2 Mbps), MacBookTM laptop, and FaceTimeTM videoconferencing application. Stakeholders had varied yet positive perspectives. The SLP focused on ICT requirements and intervention conduct. The families saw telerehabilitation benefits of cost-effectiveness and intervention effectiveness. Both SLP and the families were satisfied as telerehabilitation providers and consumers. CBRW appreciated intervention effectivity. The only barrier to telerehabilitation was low internet bandwidth. Facilitators to telerehabilitation were stronger CBR policies and SLP capacity development. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is feasible in speech-language pathology within communitybased rehabilitation in the Philippines, given community-appropriate ICT and positive experiences of stakeholders. It can flourish with faster internet, stronger community health policies, and empowering stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":34443,"journal":{"name":"PJAHS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telerehabilitation for Speech-Language Pathology in Community-\\nBased Rehabilitation in the Philippines: A Feasibility Study\",\"authors\":\"Joyce Anne Ponciano-Villafania, Ellary Grace Odtuhan, Carmela Tria, Jowillyn Capacite, Mykel Francesco Dequiña, Jelynna Noreen Alano, Beatrice Colleen Cajucom\",\"doi\":\"10.36413/pjahs.0502.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Filipino speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can reach more persons with disabilities across 7,107 Philippine islands through telerehabilitation (also known as teletherapy, telepractice). This study described the feasibility of telerehabilitation for speech-language pathology in community-based rehabilitation in terms of appropriate information and communication technologies (ICT), stakeholder perspectives, and facilitators and barriers. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Participants were purposely selected as telerehabilitation stakeholders. One metropolitan-based SLP conducted remote and synchronous therapy sessions to two persons with voice disorders (52 and 65 years old) in their homes, assisted by one primary caregiver each and one community-based rehabilitation worker (CBRW). ICT observations were logged as field notes. Stakeholder perspectives were obtained through participant journals and interviews, thematically analyzed using NVIVO, and validated by participants. Facilitators and barriers were derived from data triangulation of field notes, journals, and interviews. Results: The best ICT comprised of fastest wireless internet available (7.2 Mbps), MacBookTM laptop, and FaceTimeTM videoconferencing application. Stakeholders had varied yet positive perspectives. The SLP focused on ICT requirements and intervention conduct. The families saw telerehabilitation benefits of cost-effectiveness and intervention effectiveness. Both SLP and the families were satisfied as telerehabilitation providers and consumers. CBRW appreciated intervention effectivity. The only barrier to telerehabilitation was low internet bandwidth. Facilitators to telerehabilitation were stronger CBR policies and SLP capacity development. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is feasible in speech-language pathology within communitybased rehabilitation in the Philippines, given community-appropriate ICT and positive experiences of stakeholders. It can flourish with faster internet, stronger community health policies, and empowering stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PJAHS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PJAHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36413/pjahs.0502.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PJAHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36413/pjahs.0502.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:菲律宾语言病理学家(slp)可以通过远程康复(也称为远程治疗,远程实践)接触到菲律宾7,107个岛屿上的更多残疾人。本研究从适当的信息和通信技术(ICT)、利益相关者的角度、促进因素和障碍等方面描述了语言病理学远程康复在社区康复中的可行性。方法:采用定性描述设计。参与者被有意选择为远程康复利益相关者。一个大都市的SLP对两名患有声音障碍的人(52岁和65岁)在家中进行了远程和同步治疗,由一名主要护理人员和一名社区康复工作者(CBRW)协助。信通技术的观察记录为实地记录。通过参与者期刊和访谈获得利益相关者观点,使用NVIVO进行主题分析,并由参与者验证。促进因素和障碍来自于实地记录、期刊和访谈的数据三角测量。结果:最佳ICT包括最快的无线互联网(7.2 Mbps), MacBookTM笔记本电脑和facetimem视频会议应用程序。利益相关者有不同但积极的观点。SLP侧重于ICT要求和干预行为。这些家庭看到了远程康复的成本效益和干预效果。作为远程康复提供者和消费者,SLP和家庭都感到满意。CBRW对干预措施的有效性表示赞赏。远程康复的唯一障碍是低互联网带宽。促进远程康复的因素是更强有力的CBR政策和SLP能力发展。结论:在菲律宾,基于社区的康复中,远程康复在言语语言病理学中是可行的,因为有适合社区的ICT和利益相关者的积极经验。它可以随着更快的互联网、更强有力的社区卫生政策和赋予利益相关者权力而蓬勃发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telerehabilitation for Speech-Language Pathology in Community- Based Rehabilitation in the Philippines: A Feasibility Study
Background: Filipino speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can reach more persons with disabilities across 7,107 Philippine islands through telerehabilitation (also known as teletherapy, telepractice). This study described the feasibility of telerehabilitation for speech-language pathology in community-based rehabilitation in terms of appropriate information and communication technologies (ICT), stakeholder perspectives, and facilitators and barriers. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Participants were purposely selected as telerehabilitation stakeholders. One metropolitan-based SLP conducted remote and synchronous therapy sessions to two persons with voice disorders (52 and 65 years old) in their homes, assisted by one primary caregiver each and one community-based rehabilitation worker (CBRW). ICT observations were logged as field notes. Stakeholder perspectives were obtained through participant journals and interviews, thematically analyzed using NVIVO, and validated by participants. Facilitators and barriers were derived from data triangulation of field notes, journals, and interviews. Results: The best ICT comprised of fastest wireless internet available (7.2 Mbps), MacBookTM laptop, and FaceTimeTM videoconferencing application. Stakeholders had varied yet positive perspectives. The SLP focused on ICT requirements and intervention conduct. The families saw telerehabilitation benefits of cost-effectiveness and intervention effectiveness. Both SLP and the families were satisfied as telerehabilitation providers and consumers. CBRW appreciated intervention effectivity. The only barrier to telerehabilitation was low internet bandwidth. Facilitators to telerehabilitation were stronger CBR policies and SLP capacity development. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is feasible in speech-language pathology within communitybased rehabilitation in the Philippines, given community-appropriate ICT and positive experiences of stakeholders. It can flourish with faster internet, stronger community health policies, and empowering stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信