关于在南海争议海域开展联合海洋科学研究活动的建议

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yen-Chiang Chang, Sirong Xin, Xu Zhang
{"title":"关于在南海争议海域开展联合海洋科学研究活动的建议","authors":"Yen-Chiang Chang, Sirong Xin, Xu Zhang","doi":"10.1080/08920753.2022.2037385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract At present, although the situation in the South China Sea has generally stabilized, the negative factors that have caused the situation in the South China Sea to heat up again have not been fundamentally eliminated. Therefore, disputing parties in the South China Sea still need to continuously strengthen cooperation in the low-sensitivity areas in order to enhance mutual trust. In the disputed maritime areas of the South China Sea, there are unilateral marine scientific research and joint marine scientific research conducted by disputing parties as well as marine scientific research conducted by a third-party. All these activities have their legal basis. Through the analysis of the legal basis of various types of marine scientific research and the problems existing in practice, it is argued that joint marine scientific research is considered the most ideal way to conduct marine scientific research in the disputed areas, but its legal basis is still weak in practice. It has been recognized that integration of marine sciences and coastal management would generate better formulated marine policies and viable policy implementation strategies which may be utilized to make a significant contribution to coastal management in various aspects. Thus, in general, developing an understanding on how marine scientific research (including joint marine scientific research) could be better conducted will shed light on how coastal management can be further improved in the future scientifically. In light of the problems existing in joint marine scientific research, this paper argues that a legally binding regional marine scientific cooperation agreement in the disputed maritime areas of the South China Sea should be established.","PeriodicalId":50995,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Management","volume":"50 1","pages":"215 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Proposal for Joint Marine Scientific Research Activities in the Disputed Maritime Areas of the South China Sea\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Chiang Chang, Sirong Xin, Xu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08920753.2022.2037385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract At present, although the situation in the South China Sea has generally stabilized, the negative factors that have caused the situation in the South China Sea to heat up again have not been fundamentally eliminated. Therefore, disputing parties in the South China Sea still need to continuously strengthen cooperation in the low-sensitivity areas in order to enhance mutual trust. In the disputed maritime areas of the South China Sea, there are unilateral marine scientific research and joint marine scientific research conducted by disputing parties as well as marine scientific research conducted by a third-party. All these activities have their legal basis. Through the analysis of the legal basis of various types of marine scientific research and the problems existing in practice, it is argued that joint marine scientific research is considered the most ideal way to conduct marine scientific research in the disputed areas, but its legal basis is still weak in practice. It has been recognized that integration of marine sciences and coastal management would generate better formulated marine policies and viable policy implementation strategies which may be utilized to make a significant contribution to coastal management in various aspects. Thus, in general, developing an understanding on how marine scientific research (including joint marine scientific research) could be better conducted will shed light on how coastal management can be further improved in the future scientifically. In light of the problems existing in joint marine scientific research, this paper argues that a legally binding regional marine scientific cooperation agreement in the disputed maritime areas of the South China Sea should be established.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2022.2037385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2022.2037385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要当前,尽管南海局势总体趋于稳定,但导致南海局势再次升温的负面因素仍未从根本上消除。因此,南海争议各方仍需继续加强在低敏感领域的合作,以增进互信。在南海争议海域,既有争议各方单方面进行的海洋科学研究和联合海洋科学研究,也有第三方进行的海洋科研。所有这些活动都有其法律依据。通过对各类海洋科学研究的法律依据和实践中存在的问题的分析,认为联合海洋科学研究被认为是在争议地区进行海洋科学研究最理想的方式,但其法律依据在实践中仍然薄弱。人们认识到,将海洋科学与海岸管理相结合将产生更好的海洋政策和可行的政策执行战略,这些政策和战略可用于在各个方面对海岸管理作出重大贡献。因此,总的来说,了解如何更好地进行海洋科学研究(包括联合海洋科学研究),将有助于了解如何在未来科学地进一步改善海岸管理。针对联合海洋科学研究中存在的问题,提出应在南海争议海域建立具有法律约束力的区域海洋科学合作协定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Proposal for Joint Marine Scientific Research Activities in the Disputed Maritime Areas of the South China Sea
Abstract At present, although the situation in the South China Sea has generally stabilized, the negative factors that have caused the situation in the South China Sea to heat up again have not been fundamentally eliminated. Therefore, disputing parties in the South China Sea still need to continuously strengthen cooperation in the low-sensitivity areas in order to enhance mutual trust. In the disputed maritime areas of the South China Sea, there are unilateral marine scientific research and joint marine scientific research conducted by disputing parties as well as marine scientific research conducted by a third-party. All these activities have their legal basis. Through the analysis of the legal basis of various types of marine scientific research and the problems existing in practice, it is argued that joint marine scientific research is considered the most ideal way to conduct marine scientific research in the disputed areas, but its legal basis is still weak in practice. It has been recognized that integration of marine sciences and coastal management would generate better formulated marine policies and viable policy implementation strategies which may be utilized to make a significant contribution to coastal management in various aspects. Thus, in general, developing an understanding on how marine scientific research (including joint marine scientific research) could be better conducted will shed light on how coastal management can be further improved in the future scientifically. In light of the problems existing in joint marine scientific research, this paper argues that a legally binding regional marine scientific cooperation agreement in the disputed maritime areas of the South China Sea should be established.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Management
Coastal Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coastal Management is an international peer-reviewed, applied research journal dedicated to exploring the technical, applied ecological, legal, political, social, and policy issues relating to the use of coastal and ocean resources and environments on a global scale. The journal presents timely information on management tools and techniques as well as recent findings from research and analysis that bear directly on management and policy. Findings must be grounded in the current peer reviewed literature and relevant studies. Articles must contain a clear and relevant management component. Preference is given to studies of interest to an international readership, but case studies are accepted if conclusions are derived from acceptable evaluative methods, reference to comparable cases, and related to peer reviewed studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信