Iacopo Bassi, Claudia Bandinelli, Francesca Delchiaro, Marco Piana, Gianluca Sarti
{"title":"高温氯化氢清除降低火灾中PVC电缆烟酸的新视角——EN 60754-1与EN 60754-2的比较","authors":"Iacopo Bassi, Claudia Bandinelli, Francesca Delchiaro, Marco Piana, Gianluca Sarti","doi":"10.3390/fire6080326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 lays down harmonized conditions for marketing construction products in the European Union. One of its consequences has been the introduction of the product standard EN 50575 and standard EN 130501-6, concerning power, control, and communication cables permanently installed in buildings to prevent the risk of a fire and its consequences. EN 13501-6 provides the reaction to fire classifications for cables, the test methods to be performed, the requirements to meet a specific reaction to fire, and additional classifications for smoke production, flaming droplets, and acidity. It requires EN 60754-2 as the technical standard to assess acidity, and it defines three classes: a1, a2, and a3 (the less performant). Due to the release of hydrogen chloride during the combustion, acidity is the weak point of PVC cables, which are not yet capable of achieving the a1 or a2 classes required for specific locations according to fire risk assessments. EN 13501-6 does not include EN 60754-1, used in harmonized standards outside the scope of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011. EN 60754-1 and EN 60754-2 are common standards for determining halogen gas content, and acidity/conductivity, respectively. While they involve the same type of test apparatus, they differ in heating regimes, final temperatures, and detection methods. In particular, EN 60754-2 requires testing at temperatures between 935–965 °C in the tube furnace, where the sample burns, the smoke is collected in bubblers, and pH and conductivity are measured as an indirect assessment of acidity. On the other hand, the temperature regime of EN 60754-1 is a gradual heating run, followed by isothermal heating at 800 °C. The paper shows that when potent acid scavengers are used in PVC compounds, performing EN 60754-2 with the thermal profile of EN 60754-1 or at 500 °C in isothermal conditions, the evolution of hydrogen chloride changes significantly up to 10 times less than the test performed in isothermal at 950 °C. The reason lies behind the kinetic of hydrogen chloride release during the combustion of PVC compounds: the higher the temperature or faster the heat release, the quicker hydrogen chloride evolution and the lower the probability for the acid scavenger to trap it. Thus, these findings emphasize the “fragility” of EN 60754-2 as a tool for assessing risks associated with the release of hydrogen chloride during fires.","PeriodicalId":36395,"journal":{"name":"Fire-Switzerland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Perspective on Hydrogen Chloride Scavenging at High Temperatures for Reducing the Smoke Acidity of PVC Cables in Fires V: Comparison between EN 60754-1 and EN 60754-2\",\"authors\":\"Iacopo Bassi, Claudia Bandinelli, Francesca Delchiaro, Marco Piana, Gianluca Sarti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/fire6080326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 lays down harmonized conditions for marketing construction products in the European Union. One of its consequences has been the introduction of the product standard EN 50575 and standard EN 130501-6, concerning power, control, and communication cables permanently installed in buildings to prevent the risk of a fire and its consequences. EN 13501-6 provides the reaction to fire classifications for cables, the test methods to be performed, the requirements to meet a specific reaction to fire, and additional classifications for smoke production, flaming droplets, and acidity. It requires EN 60754-2 as the technical standard to assess acidity, and it defines three classes: a1, a2, and a3 (the less performant). Due to the release of hydrogen chloride during the combustion, acidity is the weak point of PVC cables, which are not yet capable of achieving the a1 or a2 classes required for specific locations according to fire risk assessments. EN 13501-6 does not include EN 60754-1, used in harmonized standards outside the scope of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011. EN 60754-1 and EN 60754-2 are common standards for determining halogen gas content, and acidity/conductivity, respectively. While they involve the same type of test apparatus, they differ in heating regimes, final temperatures, and detection methods. In particular, EN 60754-2 requires testing at temperatures between 935–965 °C in the tube furnace, where the sample burns, the smoke is collected in bubblers, and pH and conductivity are measured as an indirect assessment of acidity. On the other hand, the temperature regime of EN 60754-1 is a gradual heating run, followed by isothermal heating at 800 °C. The paper shows that when potent acid scavengers are used in PVC compounds, performing EN 60754-2 with the thermal profile of EN 60754-1 or at 500 °C in isothermal conditions, the evolution of hydrogen chloride changes significantly up to 10 times less than the test performed in isothermal at 950 °C. The reason lies behind the kinetic of hydrogen chloride release during the combustion of PVC compounds: the higher the temperature or faster the heat release, the quicker hydrogen chloride evolution and the lower the probability for the acid scavenger to trap it. Thus, these findings emphasize the “fragility” of EN 60754-2 as a tool for assessing risks associated with the release of hydrogen chloride during fires.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire-Switzerland\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire-Switzerland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6080326\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire-Switzerland","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6080326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
法规(EU) No 305/2011规定了在欧盟销售建筑产品的协调条件。其结果之一是引入了产品标准EN 50575和标准EN 130501-6,涉及永久安装在建筑物中的电源,控制和通信电缆,以防止火灾及其后果的风险。EN 13501-6提供了电缆对火灾的反应分类,要执行的测试方法,满足特定火灾反应的要求,以及烟雾产生,燃烧液滴和酸度的额外分类。它要求EN 60754-2作为评估酸度的技术标准,并定义了三个等级:a1, a2和a3(性能较差)。由于在燃烧过程中会释放出氯化氢,酸性是PVC电缆的弱点,根据火灾风险评估,PVC电缆还不能达到特定场所所需的a1或a2等级。EN 13501-6不包括EN 60754-1,用于法规(EU) No 305/2011范围之外的协调标准。EN 60754-1和EN 60754-2分别是测定卤素气体含量和酸度/电导率的通用标准。虽然它们涉及相同类型的测试设备,但它们在加热制度,最终温度和检测方法上有所不同。特别是,EN 60754-2要求在管式炉中在935-965°C的温度下进行测试,其中样品燃烧,烟雾收集在起泡器中,并测量pH值和电导率作为酸度的间接评估。另一方面,EN 60754-1的温度制度是一个渐进的加热运行,然后是800°C的等温加热。该论文表明,当在PVC化合物中使用强效酸清除剂时,在EN 60754-2和EN 60754-1的热分布或在500°C等温条件下,氯化氢的演变变化明显小于在950°C等温条件下进行的测试的10倍。其原因在于聚氯乙烯化合物燃烧过程中氯化氢释放的动力学:温度越高或释放热量越快,氯化氢的释放速度越快,酸清除剂捕获氯化氢的可能性越低。因此,这些发现强调了EN 60754-2作为评估火灾中氯化氢释放相关风险的工具的“脆弱性”。
A New Perspective on Hydrogen Chloride Scavenging at High Temperatures for Reducing the Smoke Acidity of PVC Cables in Fires V: Comparison between EN 60754-1 and EN 60754-2
Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 lays down harmonized conditions for marketing construction products in the European Union. One of its consequences has been the introduction of the product standard EN 50575 and standard EN 130501-6, concerning power, control, and communication cables permanently installed in buildings to prevent the risk of a fire and its consequences. EN 13501-6 provides the reaction to fire classifications for cables, the test methods to be performed, the requirements to meet a specific reaction to fire, and additional classifications for smoke production, flaming droplets, and acidity. It requires EN 60754-2 as the technical standard to assess acidity, and it defines three classes: a1, a2, and a3 (the less performant). Due to the release of hydrogen chloride during the combustion, acidity is the weak point of PVC cables, which are not yet capable of achieving the a1 or a2 classes required for specific locations according to fire risk assessments. EN 13501-6 does not include EN 60754-1, used in harmonized standards outside the scope of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011. EN 60754-1 and EN 60754-2 are common standards for determining halogen gas content, and acidity/conductivity, respectively. While they involve the same type of test apparatus, they differ in heating regimes, final temperatures, and detection methods. In particular, EN 60754-2 requires testing at temperatures between 935–965 °C in the tube furnace, where the sample burns, the smoke is collected in bubblers, and pH and conductivity are measured as an indirect assessment of acidity. On the other hand, the temperature regime of EN 60754-1 is a gradual heating run, followed by isothermal heating at 800 °C. The paper shows that when potent acid scavengers are used in PVC compounds, performing EN 60754-2 with the thermal profile of EN 60754-1 or at 500 °C in isothermal conditions, the evolution of hydrogen chloride changes significantly up to 10 times less than the test performed in isothermal at 950 °C. The reason lies behind the kinetic of hydrogen chloride release during the combustion of PVC compounds: the higher the temperature or faster the heat release, the quicker hydrogen chloride evolution and the lower the probability for the acid scavenger to trap it. Thus, these findings emphasize the “fragility” of EN 60754-2 as a tool for assessing risks associated with the release of hydrogen chloride during fires.