注意距离:西澳大利亚州在COVID-19社交距离限制期间非面对面儿童和青少年心理健康服务的经历

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Matthew McQueen, P. Strauss, A. Lin, Jacinta Freeman, N. Hill, A. Finlay-Jones, K. Bebbington, Y. Perry
{"title":"注意距离:西澳大利亚州在COVID-19社交距离限制期间非面对面儿童和青少年心理健康服务的经历","authors":"Matthew McQueen, P. Strauss, A. Lin, Jacinta Freeman, N. Hill, A. Finlay-Jones, K. Bebbington, Y. Perry","doi":"10.1080/00050067.2022.2078649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives Following the outbreak of COVID-19, social distancing restrictions limited access to face-to-face mental health services in Western Australia (WA), necessitating a rapid transition to non-face-to-face alternatives, including telehealth. The current study investigated barriers and facilitators to telehealth access and engagement, and preferences for child and youth mental health service delivery during and beyond COVID-19. Methods Three participant groups were recruited via social media and partner organisations, and completed a tailored online survey: i) young people (14–25 years) who had ever accessed or attempted to access mental health support or services (n = 84), ii) parents of young people with a child aged 0–25 years who had ever accessed or attempted to access mental health support or services with or on behalf of their child (n = 68), and iii) professionals working in the child or youth mental health sector (n = 167). Results Regarding barriers to engagement, young people were primarily concerned with the privacy implications of telehealth and its efficacy relative to face-to-face alternatives. Parents and clinicians were more concerned with the technological pitfalls of telehealth (e.g., internet-connectivity, picture/sound issues). Telehealth’s accessibility was highlighted as a facilitator for all groups. Although certain participant groups were considered to be more suited to telehealth than others, most participants endorsed a blended approach to the future provision of mental health services. Conclusions To facilitate a blended approach to the delivery of child and youth mental health services, participants recommended more reliable and affordable internet access, implementing funding models that support telehealth delivery, and training for clinical staff. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: At the time of writing, Western Australia has been fortunate enough to resist a large-scale outbreak of COVID-19, making the state relatively unique in its experience of the pandemic. Despite this, the state has experienced periods of social distancing requirements and associated impact on mental health service provision. Young people have been especially susceptible to mental health decline during the pandemic. Social distancing requirements have necessitated the rapid transition of mental health service provision from face-to-face to non-face-to-face alternatives. What this topic adds: Findings from this study provide localised insights into barriers and facilitators to engagement with non-face-to-face service delivery from the perspective of children and young people, carers and mental health professionals. Despite concerns about the relative efficacy of telehealth compared to traditional face-to-face services and challenges with technology, the majority of young people, parents, and mental health professionals in the study felt that moving forwards, child and youth mental health services should be provided using a flexible, blended approach where both face-to-face and non-face-to-face options are available.","PeriodicalId":47679,"journal":{"name":"Australian Psychologist","volume":"57 1","pages":"301 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the distance: experiences of non-face-to-face child and youth mental health services during COVID-19 social distancing restrictions in Western Australia\",\"authors\":\"Matthew McQueen, P. Strauss, A. Lin, Jacinta Freeman, N. Hill, A. Finlay-Jones, K. Bebbington, Y. Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00050067.2022.2078649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objectives Following the outbreak of COVID-19, social distancing restrictions limited access to face-to-face mental health services in Western Australia (WA), necessitating a rapid transition to non-face-to-face alternatives, including telehealth. The current study investigated barriers and facilitators to telehealth access and engagement, and preferences for child and youth mental health service delivery during and beyond COVID-19. Methods Three participant groups were recruited via social media and partner organisations, and completed a tailored online survey: i) young people (14–25 years) who had ever accessed or attempted to access mental health support or services (n = 84), ii) parents of young people with a child aged 0–25 years who had ever accessed or attempted to access mental health support or services with or on behalf of their child (n = 68), and iii) professionals working in the child or youth mental health sector (n = 167). Results Regarding barriers to engagement, young people were primarily concerned with the privacy implications of telehealth and its efficacy relative to face-to-face alternatives. Parents and clinicians were more concerned with the technological pitfalls of telehealth (e.g., internet-connectivity, picture/sound issues). Telehealth’s accessibility was highlighted as a facilitator for all groups. Although certain participant groups were considered to be more suited to telehealth than others, most participants endorsed a blended approach to the future provision of mental health services. Conclusions To facilitate a blended approach to the delivery of child and youth mental health services, participants recommended more reliable and affordable internet access, implementing funding models that support telehealth delivery, and training for clinical staff. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: At the time of writing, Western Australia has been fortunate enough to resist a large-scale outbreak of COVID-19, making the state relatively unique in its experience of the pandemic. Despite this, the state has experienced periods of social distancing requirements and associated impact on mental health service provision. Young people have been especially susceptible to mental health decline during the pandemic. Social distancing requirements have necessitated the rapid transition of mental health service provision from face-to-face to non-face-to-face alternatives. What this topic adds: Findings from this study provide localised insights into barriers and facilitators to engagement with non-face-to-face service delivery from the perspective of children and young people, carers and mental health professionals. Despite concerns about the relative efficacy of telehealth compared to traditional face-to-face services and challenges with technology, the majority of young people, parents, and mental health professionals in the study felt that moving forwards, child and youth mental health services should be provided using a flexible, blended approach where both face-to-face and non-face-to-face options are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"301 - 314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2078649\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2078649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发后,社交距离限制限制了西澳大利亚州(WA)获得面对面精神卫生服务的机会,需要迅速过渡到非面对面的替代方案,包括远程医疗。目前的研究调查了远程医疗获取和参与的障碍和促进因素,以及在COVID-19期间和之后对儿童和青少年精神卫生服务提供的偏好。方法通过社交媒体和合作伙伴组织招募三个参与者组,并完成量身定制的在线调查:1)曾经获得或试图获得心理健康支持或服务的青年(14-25岁)(n = 84); 2)有0-25岁子女的青年父母,他们曾与子女一起或代表子女获得或试图获得心理健康支持或服务(n = 68); 3)儿童或青年心理健康部门的专业人员(n = 167)。结果关于参与障碍,年轻人主要关注远程医疗的隐私影响及其相对于面对面替代方案的功效。家长和临床医生更关心远程医疗的技术缺陷(例如,互联网连接、图像/声音问题)。远程保健的可及性被强调为所有群体的促进因素。虽然某些参与者群体被认为比其他参与者群体更适合远程保健,但大多数参与者赞成在今后提供精神保健服务时采取混合办法。为促进以混合方式提供儿童和青少年心理健康服务,与会者建议提供更可靠和负担得起的互联网接入,实施支持远程保健服务的供资模式,并培训临床工作人员。关于这个话题的已知信息:在撰写本文时,西澳大利亚州很幸运地抵制了COVID-19的大规模爆发,使该州在大流行方面的经验相对独特。尽管如此,该州经历了要求保持社交距离的时期,并对心理健康服务的提供产生了相关影响。在大流行期间,年轻人尤其容易受到精神健康下降的影响。保持社会距离的要求使提供精神卫生服务的方式迅速从面对面转变为非面对面。本课题补充的内容:本研究的结果从儿童和青少年、护理人员和精神卫生专业人员的角度,对参与非面对面服务提供的障碍和促进因素提供了本地化的见解。尽管与传统的面对面服务相比,人们对远程保健的相对功效和技术方面的挑战感到担忧,但研究中的大多数年轻人、父母和心理健康专业人员认为,今后,应采用灵活的混合方法提供儿童和青少年心理健康服务,同时提供面对面和非面对面的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the distance: experiences of non-face-to-face child and youth mental health services during COVID-19 social distancing restrictions in Western Australia
ABSTRACT Objectives Following the outbreak of COVID-19, social distancing restrictions limited access to face-to-face mental health services in Western Australia (WA), necessitating a rapid transition to non-face-to-face alternatives, including telehealth. The current study investigated barriers and facilitators to telehealth access and engagement, and preferences for child and youth mental health service delivery during and beyond COVID-19. Methods Three participant groups were recruited via social media and partner organisations, and completed a tailored online survey: i) young people (14–25 years) who had ever accessed or attempted to access mental health support or services (n = 84), ii) parents of young people with a child aged 0–25 years who had ever accessed or attempted to access mental health support or services with or on behalf of their child (n = 68), and iii) professionals working in the child or youth mental health sector (n = 167). Results Regarding barriers to engagement, young people were primarily concerned with the privacy implications of telehealth and its efficacy relative to face-to-face alternatives. Parents and clinicians were more concerned with the technological pitfalls of telehealth (e.g., internet-connectivity, picture/sound issues). Telehealth’s accessibility was highlighted as a facilitator for all groups. Although certain participant groups were considered to be more suited to telehealth than others, most participants endorsed a blended approach to the future provision of mental health services. Conclusions To facilitate a blended approach to the delivery of child and youth mental health services, participants recommended more reliable and affordable internet access, implementing funding models that support telehealth delivery, and training for clinical staff. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: At the time of writing, Western Australia has been fortunate enough to resist a large-scale outbreak of COVID-19, making the state relatively unique in its experience of the pandemic. Despite this, the state has experienced periods of social distancing requirements and associated impact on mental health service provision. Young people have been especially susceptible to mental health decline during the pandemic. Social distancing requirements have necessitated the rapid transition of mental health service provision from face-to-face to non-face-to-face alternatives. What this topic adds: Findings from this study provide localised insights into barriers and facilitators to engagement with non-face-to-face service delivery from the perspective of children and young people, carers and mental health professionals. Despite concerns about the relative efficacy of telehealth compared to traditional face-to-face services and challenges with technology, the majority of young people, parents, and mental health professionals in the study felt that moving forwards, child and youth mental health services should be provided using a flexible, blended approach where both face-to-face and non-face-to-face options are available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Psychologist
Australian Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Australian Psychologist is the official applied practice and public policy journal of the Australian Psychological Society. As such, the journal solicits articles covering current issues in psychology, the science and practice of psychology, and psychology"s contribution to public policy, with particular emphasis on the Australian context. Periodically, Australian Psychological Society documents, including but not limited to, position papers, reports of the Society, ethics information, surveys of the membership, announcements, and selected award addresses may appear in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信