有些人比其他人更平等

IF 0.9 4区心理学 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Interaction Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1075/is.18043.fra

Marlena R. Fraune, S. Šabanović, Eliot R. Smith

{"title":"有些人比其他人更平等","authors":"Marlena R. Fraune, S. Šabanović, Eliot R. Smith","doi":"10.1075/is.18043.fra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How do people treat robot teammates compared to human opponents? Past research indicates that people favor, and behave\n more morally toward, ingroup than outgroup members. People also perceive that they have more moral responsibilities toward humans than\n nonhumans. This paper presents a 2×2×3 experimental study that placed participants (N = 102) into competing teams of humans\n and robots. We examined how people morally behave toward and perceive players depending on players’ Group Membership (ingroup, outgroup),\n Agent Type (human, robot), and participant group Team Composition (humans as minority, equal, or majority within the ingroup compared to\n robots). Results indicated that participants favored the ingroup over the outgroup and humans over robots – to the extent that they favored\n ingroup robots over outgroup humans. Interestingly, people differentiated more between ingroup than outgroup humans and robots. These\n effects generalized across Team Composition.","PeriodicalId":46494,"journal":{"name":"Interaction Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some are more equal than others\",\"authors\":\"Marlena R. Fraune, S. Šabanović, Eliot R. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/is.18043.fra\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n How do people treat robot teammates compared to human opponents? Past research indicates that people favor, and behave\\n more morally toward, ingroup than outgroup members. People also perceive that they have more moral responsibilities toward humans than\\n nonhumans. This paper presents a 2×2×3 experimental study that placed participants (N = 102) into competing teams of humans\\n and robots. We examined how people morally behave toward and perceive players depending on players’ Group Membership (ingroup, outgroup),\\n Agent Type (human, robot), and participant group Team Composition (humans as minority, equal, or majority within the ingroup compared to\\n robots). Results indicated that participants favored the ingroup over the outgroup and humans over robots – to the extent that they favored\\n ingroup robots over outgroup humans. Interestingly, people differentiated more between ingroup than outgroup humans and robots. These\\n effects generalized across Team Composition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interaction Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interaction Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18043.fra\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interaction Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18043.fra","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

与人类对手相比，人们如何对待机器人队友？过去的研究表明，人们更喜欢内部群体，对外部群体的行为也更道德。人们也意识到他们对人类比非人类负有更多的道德责任。本文提出了一个2×2×3的实验研究，将参与者（N = 102）分成人类和机器人的竞争团队。我们研究了人们在道德上如何对待和感知玩家，这取决于玩家的群体成员身份（内群体、外群体）、代理类型（人类、机器人）和参与者群体团队组成（与机器人相比，人类是内群体中的少数、平等或多数）。结果表明，参与者更喜欢内部群体而不是外部群体，更喜欢人类而不是机器人——在某种程度上，他们更喜欢内部机器人而不是外部人类。有趣的是，人们在内部群体中的差异比在外部群体中的人类和机器人更大。这些影响在团队构成中普遍存在。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Some are more equal than others

How do people treat robot teammates compared to human opponents? Past research indicates that people favor, and behave more morally toward, ingroup than outgroup members. People also perceive that they have more moral responsibilities toward humans than nonhumans. This paper presents a 2×2×3 experimental study that placed participants (N = 102) into competing teams of humans and robots. We examined how people morally behave toward and perceive players depending on players’ Group Membership (ingroup, outgroup), Agent Type (human, robot), and participant group Team Composition (humans as minority, equal, or majority within the ingroup compared to robots). Results indicated that participants favored the ingroup over the outgroup and humans over robots – to the extent that they favored ingroup robots over outgroup humans. Interestingly, people differentiated more between ingroup than outgroup humans and robots. These effects generalized across Team Composition.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Interaction Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： This international peer-reviewed journal aims to advance knowledge in the growing and strongly interdisciplinary area of Interaction Studies in biological and artificial systems. Understanding social behaviour and communication in biological and artificial systems requires knowledge of evolutionary, developmental and neurobiological aspects of social behaviour and communication; the embodied nature of interactions; origins and characteristics of social and narrative intelligence; perception, action and communication in the context of dynamic and social environments; social learning.