Re St Nicholas,Tackley

IF 0.6 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
D. Willink
{"title":"Re St Nicholas,Tackley","authors":"D. Willink","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Commonwealth War Graves Commission is the sole organisation charged with the commemoration of members of the Commonwealth forces who died during the two World Wars– the official war periods being 4 August 1914 to 31 August 1921, and 3 September 1939 to 31 December 1947–where the death was the result either of wounds inflicted or an accident occurring during active service, or disease aggravated by active service. In practice, this means that serving military personnel are commemorated irrespective of the cause, location or circumstances of their death. Private William Walker had served in France and Belgium before he and two comrades died while on service in Ireland on 22 February 1921. It was known that his body had been returned and buried in the churchyard, but its precise location was unknown. The Commission wished to install a standard war pattern headstone to Private Walker, with the superscription (usual in these circumstances) ‘Buried elsewhere in this Churchyard’. The incumbent and PCC understood the desire for such a memorial, but was also concerned by the possibility of unintended pastoral harm by the official commemoration of an English soldier killed in Ireland. The rector was thought to be particularly concerned in the light of problems of contested heritage. They declined to make a decision on the Commission’s request, instead inviting the Commission to petition for a faculty so that the court could carry out the necessary balancing exercise. The court was satisfied that there was no good reason militating against the introduction of the proposed memorial, whose wording did not mention Ireland at all. First, Private Walker and his comrades had not died in armed conflict with Irish forces, but had been captured and executed as ‘spies’ by the IRA. No-one could sensibly have anything but the most profound sympathy for Private Walker and his family. (The other two comrades were already officially commemorated elsewhere.) More broadly, there would be an unhappy dissonance between receiving a body for burial in a churchyard yet refusing to commemorate them. There was no basis for the fear of upsetting any Irish Catholic who might visit the churchyard, any more than would be the case with any other foreign national viewing a memorial to a soldier who fell in a conflict with that person’s own country. A faculty would issue, permitting the installation of the proposed headstone next to the only other Commission headstone in the churchyard. [DW]","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"274 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re St Nicholas, Tackley\",\"authors\":\"D. Willink\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0956618x23000170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Commonwealth War Graves Commission is the sole organisation charged with the commemoration of members of the Commonwealth forces who died during the two World Wars– the official war periods being 4 August 1914 to 31 August 1921, and 3 September 1939 to 31 December 1947–where the death was the result either of wounds inflicted or an accident occurring during active service, or disease aggravated by active service. In practice, this means that serving military personnel are commemorated irrespective of the cause, location or circumstances of their death. Private William Walker had served in France and Belgium before he and two comrades died while on service in Ireland on 22 February 1921. It was known that his body had been returned and buried in the churchyard, but its precise location was unknown. The Commission wished to install a standard war pattern headstone to Private Walker, with the superscription (usual in these circumstances) ‘Buried elsewhere in this Churchyard’. The incumbent and PCC understood the desire for such a memorial, but was also concerned by the possibility of unintended pastoral harm by the official commemoration of an English soldier killed in Ireland. The rector was thought to be particularly concerned in the light of problems of contested heritage. They declined to make a decision on the Commission’s request, instead inviting the Commission to petition for a faculty so that the court could carry out the necessary balancing exercise. The court was satisfied that there was no good reason militating against the introduction of the proposed memorial, whose wording did not mention Ireland at all. First, Private Walker and his comrades had not died in armed conflict with Irish forces, but had been captured and executed as ‘spies’ by the IRA. No-one could sensibly have anything but the most profound sympathy for Private Walker and his family. (The other two comrades were already officially commemorated elsewhere.) More broadly, there would be an unhappy dissonance between receiving a body for burial in a churchyard yet refusing to commemorate them. There was no basis for the fear of upsetting any Irish Catholic who might visit the churchyard, any more than would be the case with any other foreign national viewing a memorial to a soldier who fell in a conflict with that person’s own country. A faculty would issue, permitting the installation of the proposed headstone next to the only other Commission headstone in the churchyard. [DW]\",\"PeriodicalId\":53956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"274 - 274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英联邦战争墓地委员会是唯一一个负责纪念在两次世界大战中牺牲的英联邦部队成员的组织,这两次世界战争的正式战争时期分别是1914年8月4日至1921年8月31日和1939年9月3日至1947年12月31日,在这两次战争中,或因服役而加重的疾病。在实践中,这意味着纪念现役军人,无论他们的死因、地点或情况如何。二等兵威廉·沃克曾在法国和比利时服役,1921年2月22日,他和两名战友在爱尔兰服役期间去世。众所周知,他的遗体已被归还并安葬在教堂墓地,但其确切位置尚不清楚。委员会希望为二等兵沃克安装一块标准的战争图案墓碑,上面写着“埋葬在这个教堂的其他地方”。现任总统和PCC理解建立这样一座纪念碑的愿望,但也担心官方纪念一名在爱尔兰阵亡的英国士兵可能会造成意想不到的田园伤害。鉴于有争议的遗产问题,校长被认为特别关注。他们拒绝就委员会的请求做出决定,而是邀请委员会申请一名教员,以便法院进行必要的平衡工作。法院认为,没有充分的理由反对引入拟议的纪念碑,纪念碑的措辞根本没有提到爱尔兰。首先,二等兵沃克和他的战友们并没有在与爱尔兰军队的武装冲突中死亡,而是被爱尔兰共和军作为“间谍”抓获并处决。没有人能理智地对二等兵沃克和他的家人表示最深切的同情。(其他两位同志已经在其他地方被正式纪念了。)更广泛地说,在教堂墓地接受埋葬的遗体和拒绝纪念他们之间会有一种不愉快的不和谐。没有理由担心会惹恼任何可能会去教堂墓地的爱尔兰天主教徒,就像任何其他外国国民观看一名在与本国冲突中阵亡的士兵的纪念碑一样。一位教员将发布命令,允许在教堂墓地唯一的另一块委员会墓碑旁边安装拟议的墓碑。[DW]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re St Nicholas, Tackley
The Commonwealth War Graves Commission is the sole organisation charged with the commemoration of members of the Commonwealth forces who died during the two World Wars– the official war periods being 4 August 1914 to 31 August 1921, and 3 September 1939 to 31 December 1947–where the death was the result either of wounds inflicted or an accident occurring during active service, or disease aggravated by active service. In practice, this means that serving military personnel are commemorated irrespective of the cause, location or circumstances of their death. Private William Walker had served in France and Belgium before he and two comrades died while on service in Ireland on 22 February 1921. It was known that his body had been returned and buried in the churchyard, but its precise location was unknown. The Commission wished to install a standard war pattern headstone to Private Walker, with the superscription (usual in these circumstances) ‘Buried elsewhere in this Churchyard’. The incumbent and PCC understood the desire for such a memorial, but was also concerned by the possibility of unintended pastoral harm by the official commemoration of an English soldier killed in Ireland. The rector was thought to be particularly concerned in the light of problems of contested heritage. They declined to make a decision on the Commission’s request, instead inviting the Commission to petition for a faculty so that the court could carry out the necessary balancing exercise. The court was satisfied that there was no good reason militating against the introduction of the proposed memorial, whose wording did not mention Ireland at all. First, Private Walker and his comrades had not died in armed conflict with Irish forces, but had been captured and executed as ‘spies’ by the IRA. No-one could sensibly have anything but the most profound sympathy for Private Walker and his family. (The other two comrades were already officially commemorated elsewhere.) More broadly, there would be an unhappy dissonance between receiving a body for burial in a churchyard yet refusing to commemorate them. There was no basis for the fear of upsetting any Irish Catholic who might visit the churchyard, any more than would be the case with any other foreign national viewing a memorial to a soldier who fell in a conflict with that person’s own country. A faculty would issue, permitting the installation of the proposed headstone next to the only other Commission headstone in the churchyard. [DW]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信