来自萨福克郡的三个中世纪后的砝码在科尔切斯特镇得到验证,上面有一个以前不为人知的官方印章

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
A. Bliss
{"title":"来自萨福克郡的三个中世纪后的砝码在科尔切斯特镇得到验证,上面有一个以前不为人知的官方印章","authors":"A. Bliss","doi":"10.1080/00794236.2019.1659582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of stamped verification marks on post-medieval weights is a well-known phenomenon, one discussed in some detail by various writers, most notably by Norman Biggs. Manufactured most frequently in the late medieval and early post-medieval periods (c. 15th to early 17th centuries), weights made in lead with stamped verification marks enjoyed a lengthy period of use until their decline in the 18th century, following the intensified production of copper-alloy pieces under the official auspices of the London-based Founders’ Company. In 1834, lead weights were banned completely in favour of the latter. While the majority of known lead weights consist of plain homemade examples, there is a proportion bearing official (or unofficial, as it may be) marks that variously allude to their origin, the cipher of the monarch under which they were issued, the measuring system to which they corresponded and their own weight. Of the ‘official’ lead weights, most are of London manufacture, bearing the arms of the City of London, the Plumbers’ Company (who maintained a monopoly on the checking of weights) and/or the sword of St Paul. They appear to have been manufactured mostly in the reigns of Charles I (1625–49) and Charles II (1660–85), though earlier examples from the reign of Elizabeth I (1558–1603) are known, as well as 17th-century pieces issued under James I (1603–25) or James II (1685–88). Weights bearing the conjoined arms of England and Ireland demonstrate that, despite regime change, issue continued under the Commonwealth (1649–60). Given that the City was both the home of centralized government and the Plumbers’ Company, it follows that the mainstay of surviving lead weights originated there — presumably making their way into the surrounding countryside before being lost in various circumstances. Though London was the main centre of production, provincial examples are also known — dominated, in at least the reigns of Charles I and II, by pieces produced and verified in Norwich. Other regional centres must also have undertaken similar duties, but it is far more difficult to attribute lead weights to them. A weight stamped with the mark of a crenellated tower found at Market-with-Rame, Cornwall (CORN-CD5EC3, Fig. 1), has been attributed to Exeter or Truro by the recorder. In Somerset, a sub-circular piece from Wedmore bearing the imprint of a Bristol Corporation trade token (SOMFEF663, Fig. 2) could be interpreted as an attempt to produce a semi-official weight for that town and the surrounding area. From Trudoxhill in the same county, a circular weight (SOM-C3ACB9, Fig. 3) stamped with the inscription ‘DANIEL . PLVMER . I .’ around a Tudor rose may possibly represent local manufacture by a provincial member of the Plumbers’ Company. In addition, there are a number of pieces that bear coats of arms and various other designs that may refer to both private individuals or to hitherto unidentified town corporations.","PeriodicalId":43560,"journal":{"name":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","volume":"53 1","pages":"293 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659582","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes and News Three Post-Medieval weights from Suffolk verified at the town of Colchester, bearing a previously unknown officiating stamp\",\"authors\":\"A. Bliss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00794236.2019.1659582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of stamped verification marks on post-medieval weights is a well-known phenomenon, one discussed in some detail by various writers, most notably by Norman Biggs. Manufactured most frequently in the late medieval and early post-medieval periods (c. 15th to early 17th centuries), weights made in lead with stamped verification marks enjoyed a lengthy period of use until their decline in the 18th century, following the intensified production of copper-alloy pieces under the official auspices of the London-based Founders’ Company. In 1834, lead weights were banned completely in favour of the latter. While the majority of known lead weights consist of plain homemade examples, there is a proportion bearing official (or unofficial, as it may be) marks that variously allude to their origin, the cipher of the monarch under which they were issued, the measuring system to which they corresponded and their own weight. Of the ‘official’ lead weights, most are of London manufacture, bearing the arms of the City of London, the Plumbers’ Company (who maintained a monopoly on the checking of weights) and/or the sword of St Paul. They appear to have been manufactured mostly in the reigns of Charles I (1625–49) and Charles II (1660–85), though earlier examples from the reign of Elizabeth I (1558–1603) are known, as well as 17th-century pieces issued under James I (1603–25) or James II (1685–88). Weights bearing the conjoined arms of England and Ireland demonstrate that, despite regime change, issue continued under the Commonwealth (1649–60). Given that the City was both the home of centralized government and the Plumbers’ Company, it follows that the mainstay of surviving lead weights originated there — presumably making their way into the surrounding countryside before being lost in various circumstances. Though London was the main centre of production, provincial examples are also known — dominated, in at least the reigns of Charles I and II, by pieces produced and verified in Norwich. Other regional centres must also have undertaken similar duties, but it is far more difficult to attribute lead weights to them. A weight stamped with the mark of a crenellated tower found at Market-with-Rame, Cornwall (CORN-CD5EC3, Fig. 1), has been attributed to Exeter or Truro by the recorder. In Somerset, a sub-circular piece from Wedmore bearing the imprint of a Bristol Corporation trade token (SOMFEF663, Fig. 2) could be interpreted as an attempt to produce a semi-official weight for that town and the surrounding area. From Trudoxhill in the same county, a circular weight (SOM-C3ACB9, Fig. 3) stamped with the inscription ‘DANIEL . PLVMER . I .’ around a Tudor rose may possibly represent local manufacture by a provincial member of the Plumbers’ Company. In addition, there are a number of pieces that bear coats of arms and various other designs that may refer to both private individuals or to hitherto unidentified town corporations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"293 - 297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659582\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在中世纪后的砝码上使用冲压验证标记是一种众所周知的现象,许多作家都对此进行了详细讨论,其中最著名的是诺曼·比格斯。最常见的制造于中世纪晚期和后中世纪早期(约15至17世纪初),带有冲压验证标记的铅制砝码使用了很长一段时间,直到18世纪在总部位于伦敦的创始人公司的官方赞助下加强了铜合金件的生产后才逐渐衰落。1834年,铅锤被完全禁止,取而代之的是后者。虽然大多数已知的铅砝码都是自制的,但也有一些带有官方(或非官方,视情况而定)标记的比例,这些标记不同程度地暗示了铅砝码的来源、发行铅砝码时使用的君主密码、铅砝码对应的测量系统以及铅砝码本身的重量。在“官方”铅锤中,大多数是伦敦制造的,带有伦敦金融城、水管工公司(在重量检查方面保持垄断地位)和/或圣保罗之剑的武器。它们似乎主要是在查理一世(1625–49)和查理二世(1660–85)统治时期制造的,尽管已知伊丽莎白一世(1558–1603)统治时期的早期例子,以及詹姆斯一世(1603–25)或詹姆斯二世(1685–88)时期发行的17世纪作品。英格兰和爱尔兰联合兵种的重量表明,尽管政权发生了变化,但在英联邦统治下(1649-60),这一问题仍在继续。考虑到该市既是中央政府的所在地,也是水管工公司的所在地。因此,幸存下来的铅锤的主要来源于那里——可能是在各种情况下丢失之前,它们进入了周围的农村。尽管伦敦是主要的生产中心,但省级的例子也是众所周知的——至少在查理一世和查理二世统治时期,主要是在诺维奇生产和验证的作品。其他区域中心也必须承担类似的职责,但要将铅的重量归因于它们要困难得多。记录者将在康沃尔郡拉姆市场发现的印有锯齿塔标记的砝码(CORN-CD5EC3,图1)归因于埃克塞特或特鲁罗。在萨默塞特郡,Wedmore的一件带有布里斯托尔公司贸易代币印记的亚圆形作品(SOMFEF663,图2)可以被解释为试图为该镇及其周边地区制造半官方重量。来自同一县的特鲁多克希尔,一个圆形砝码(SOM-C3ACB9,图3)上刻有“DANIEL”字样。PLVMER。我都铎玫瑰周围可能代表了水管工公司省级成员在当地生产的玫瑰。此外,还有一些带有纹章和各种其他设计的作品,可能涉及私人或迄今为止身份不明的城镇公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Notes and News Three Post-Medieval weights from Suffolk verified at the town of Colchester, bearing a previously unknown officiating stamp
The use of stamped verification marks on post-medieval weights is a well-known phenomenon, one discussed in some detail by various writers, most notably by Norman Biggs. Manufactured most frequently in the late medieval and early post-medieval periods (c. 15th to early 17th centuries), weights made in lead with stamped verification marks enjoyed a lengthy period of use until their decline in the 18th century, following the intensified production of copper-alloy pieces under the official auspices of the London-based Founders’ Company. In 1834, lead weights were banned completely in favour of the latter. While the majority of known lead weights consist of plain homemade examples, there is a proportion bearing official (or unofficial, as it may be) marks that variously allude to their origin, the cipher of the monarch under which they were issued, the measuring system to which they corresponded and their own weight. Of the ‘official’ lead weights, most are of London manufacture, bearing the arms of the City of London, the Plumbers’ Company (who maintained a monopoly on the checking of weights) and/or the sword of St Paul. They appear to have been manufactured mostly in the reigns of Charles I (1625–49) and Charles II (1660–85), though earlier examples from the reign of Elizabeth I (1558–1603) are known, as well as 17th-century pieces issued under James I (1603–25) or James II (1685–88). Weights bearing the conjoined arms of England and Ireland demonstrate that, despite regime change, issue continued under the Commonwealth (1649–60). Given that the City was both the home of centralized government and the Plumbers’ Company, it follows that the mainstay of surviving lead weights originated there — presumably making their way into the surrounding countryside before being lost in various circumstances. Though London was the main centre of production, provincial examples are also known — dominated, in at least the reigns of Charles I and II, by pieces produced and verified in Norwich. Other regional centres must also have undertaken similar duties, but it is far more difficult to attribute lead weights to them. A weight stamped with the mark of a crenellated tower found at Market-with-Rame, Cornwall (CORN-CD5EC3, Fig. 1), has been attributed to Exeter or Truro by the recorder. In Somerset, a sub-circular piece from Wedmore bearing the imprint of a Bristol Corporation trade token (SOMFEF663, Fig. 2) could be interpreted as an attempt to produce a semi-official weight for that town and the surrounding area. From Trudoxhill in the same county, a circular weight (SOM-C3ACB9, Fig. 3) stamped with the inscription ‘DANIEL . PLVMER . I .’ around a Tudor rose may possibly represent local manufacture by a provincial member of the Plumbers’ Company. In addition, there are a number of pieces that bear coats of arms and various other designs that may refer to both private individuals or to hitherto unidentified town corporations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信