PFABC成本核算系统实施框架的设计与实证检验

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
M. Namazi, Z. Hosseini
{"title":"PFABC成本核算系统实施框架的设计与实证检验","authors":"M. Namazi, Z. Hosseini","doi":"10.24191/APMAJ.V15I3.1331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance Focused Activity Based Costing (PFABC) system is the third generation of the ABC systems. The major purposes of this study were: 1. to design a framework for identifying constructs that should be selected for successful implementation of the PFABC system? And empirically test it and 2: to explain why there is a gap between theory and practice of this system? In achieving these objectives, content analysis, contingent theory, and innovation theory were employed. The statistical population consisted of all Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) companies. In 2018, 450 questionnaires were sent to (TSE) corporate executives and 262 usable responses were collected. The Structural Modeling Equations (SME), SPSS and SMARTPLS software were employed to test related hypotheses and analyze the results. The results of the study clearly showed that environmental constructs (0.997) had the greatest impact, followed by cost constructs (0.996), technological constructs (0.993) and finally organizational constructs (0.981), respectively. However, there was no significant relationship between the desire to save, system integration, time of system implementation, and implementation of the PFABC costing system. These constructs are also the major imputes responsible for the existence of a gap between theory and practice. The application of ABC, TDABC, and PFABC among TSE firms, was 6.1%, 0.04% and 0%, accordingly. Hence, there is a huge gap between theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Empirical Testing of a Framework for Implementing PFABC Costing Systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Namazi, Z. Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/APMAJ.V15I3.1331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performance Focused Activity Based Costing (PFABC) system is the third generation of the ABC systems. The major purposes of this study were: 1. to design a framework for identifying constructs that should be selected for successful implementation of the PFABC system? And empirically test it and 2: to explain why there is a gap between theory and practice of this system? In achieving these objectives, content analysis, contingent theory, and innovation theory were employed. The statistical population consisted of all Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) companies. In 2018, 450 questionnaires were sent to (TSE) corporate executives and 262 usable responses were collected. The Structural Modeling Equations (SME), SPSS and SMARTPLS software were employed to test related hypotheses and analyze the results. The results of the study clearly showed that environmental constructs (0.997) had the greatest impact, followed by cost constructs (0.996), technological constructs (0.993) and finally organizational constructs (0.981), respectively. However, there was no significant relationship between the desire to save, system integration, time of system implementation, and implementation of the PFABC costing system. These constructs are also the major imputes responsible for the existence of a gap between theory and practice. The application of ABC, TDABC, and PFABC among TSE firms, was 6.1%, 0.04% and 0%, accordingly. Hence, there is a huge gap between theory and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/APMAJ.V15I3.1331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/APMAJ.V15I3.1331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以绩效为中心的作业成本核算(PFABC)是第三代作业成本核算体系。本研究的主要目的是:1。设计一个框架,以确定成功实施PFABC系统应选择的结构?并对其进行实证检验和2:解释为什么这一制度的理论与实践存在差距?在实现这些目标的过程中,运用了内容分析、权变理论和创新理论。统计人口包括德黑兰证券交易所(TSE)的所有公司。2018年,我们向(TSE)企业高管发放了450份问卷,收集了262份可用回复。采用结构建模方程(SME)、SPSS和SMARTPLS软件对相关假设进行检验和分析。研究结果显示,环境构式(0.997)的影响最大,其次是成本构式(0.996)、技术构式(0.993),最后是组织构式(0.981)。然而,节约愿望、系统集成、系统实施时间与PFABC成本核算系统的实施之间没有显著的关系。这些构想也是理论与实践之间存在差距的主要原因。ABC、TDABC和PFABC在TSE公司中的应用分别为6.1%、0.04%和0%。因此,理论与实践之间存在着巨大的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and Empirical Testing of a Framework for Implementing PFABC Costing Systems
Performance Focused Activity Based Costing (PFABC) system is the third generation of the ABC systems. The major purposes of this study were: 1. to design a framework for identifying constructs that should be selected for successful implementation of the PFABC system? And empirically test it and 2: to explain why there is a gap between theory and practice of this system? In achieving these objectives, content analysis, contingent theory, and innovation theory were employed. The statistical population consisted of all Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) companies. In 2018, 450 questionnaires were sent to (TSE) corporate executives and 262 usable responses were collected. The Structural Modeling Equations (SME), SPSS and SMARTPLS software were employed to test related hypotheses and analyze the results. The results of the study clearly showed that environmental constructs (0.997) had the greatest impact, followed by cost constructs (0.996), technological constructs (0.993) and finally organizational constructs (0.981), respectively. However, there was no significant relationship between the desire to save, system integration, time of system implementation, and implementation of the PFABC costing system. These constructs are also the major imputes responsible for the existence of a gap between theory and practice. The application of ABC, TDABC, and PFABC among TSE firms, was 6.1%, 0.04% and 0%, accordingly. Hence, there is a huge gap between theory and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信