Q2 Arts and Humanities
A. Sinitsyn
{"title":"Τὰ Ὅπλα Τῶν Γεφυρέων Of The Persian War: Herodotus On The Banishment Of The Barbarians Out Of Europe And The Issue Of The Completeness Of The First „The Histories”","authors":"A. Sinitsyn","doi":"10.26485/aal/2019/65/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the principal “Herodotean question” of the completeness of the work done by the historian. How well did Herodotus manage to accomplish his design? Should we regard his work in the form it has reached us as complete and integral? Or does it end abruptly at the events of 479/8 BC, despite “the Father of History” having planned to continue his account of the Greek-Persian wars? Over the last century and a half, pluralism in the views the researchers on the issue of the completeness of Herodotus’ work has emerged. The author ventures some observations on the finale of the The Histories and draws our attention to the passage Hdt. 9.121 in which Herodotus emphasizes the fact that the barbarians transgressing the geographical boundaries of Europe had been punished: the cables of the bridges which the Persians had used to tie Asia and Europe were taken to Hellas by the victors. According to the author, the historian’s testimony τὰ ὅπλα τῶν γeφυρέων ὡς ἀναθήσοντeς ἐς τὰ ἱρά symbolizes the end of the war against the Barbarian, hence, the accomplishment of Herodotus’ design – the completion of the account of “great and marvellous deeds done by Greeks and foreigners and especially the reason why they warred against each other”.","PeriodicalId":37616,"journal":{"name":"Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26485/aal/2019/65/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章讨论了历史学家所做工作的完整性的主要“希罗多德问题”。希罗多德在多大程度上完成了他的设计?我们是否应该将他的作品视为完整和完整的作品?还是在公元前479/8年的事件中突然结束,尽管“历史之父”计划继续他对希腊-波斯战争的描述?在过去的一个半世纪里,研究者对希罗多德著作完整性问题的看法出现了多元化。作者对《历史》的结局进行了一些观察,并提请我们注意Hdt这段话。9.121希罗多德在书中强调,侵犯欧洲地理边界的野蛮人受到了惩罚:波斯人用来连接亚洲和欧洲的桥梁电缆被胜利者带到了希腊。根据作者的说法,历史学家的证词τὰ ὅπλατῶγeφυρέωὡςἀΓαθήστεςἐςτὰ ἱρά 象征着对野蛮人的战争的结束,因此,希罗多德的设计完成了——完成了“希腊人和外国人所做的伟大而奇妙的事情,尤其是他们相互争斗的原因”的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Τὰ Ὅπλα Τῶν Γεφυρέων Of The Persian War: Herodotus On The Banishment Of The Barbarians Out Of Europe And The Issue Of The Completeness Of The First „The Histories”
The article discusses the principal “Herodotean question” of the completeness of the work done by the historian. How well did Herodotus manage to accomplish his design? Should we regard his work in the form it has reached us as complete and integral? Or does it end abruptly at the events of 479/8 BC, despite “the Father of History” having planned to continue his account of the Greek-Persian wars? Over the last century and a half, pluralism in the views the researchers on the issue of the completeness of Herodotus’ work has emerged. The author ventures some observations on the finale of the The Histories and draws our attention to the passage Hdt. 9.121 in which Herodotus emphasizes the fact that the barbarians transgressing the geographical boundaries of Europe had been punished: the cables of the bridges which the Persians had used to tie Asia and Europe were taken to Hellas by the victors. According to the author, the historian’s testimony τὰ ὅπλα τῶν γeφυρέων ὡς ἀναθήσοντeς ἐς τὰ ἱρά symbolizes the end of the war against the Barbarian, hence, the accomplishment of Herodotus’ design – the completion of the account of “great and marvellous deeds done by Greeks and foreigners and especially the reason why they warred against each other”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia
Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia is the oldest archaeological journal in the Lodz research center. It has been published as an annual for more than half a century. A rich variety of subjects, which are showing current research possibilities and new trends in archeology, characterizes published texts. Articles dedicated to issues of link between archeology and other disciplines (mainly: history, history of science and technology, architecture, art history) are often inserted. Chronological frameworks embrace a wide time range from the Stone Age to the present day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信