Iconomy、Iconoclash≠Iconomics

Q3 Arts and Humanities
T. Smith
{"title":"Iconomy、Iconoclash≠Iconomics","authors":"T. Smith","doi":"10.7146/nja.v30i61-62.127897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jean-Paul Sartre’s remark, made in his The Imagination (1936), is used as a prefatory quotation by W.J.T. Mitchell in Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (1986), his classic study of the nature of images and the differences between images and words.1 Like everything else that Mitchell (and Sartre) says about these topics, this gesture is immediately relevant to the issues raised by the questionnaire. Indeed, the first two sentences of the questionnaire set up a relationship between images and imagery, or single images and the overall image flow, that is indeed “traditional,” in fact, ancient, as a presumption, one that is so instinctive to thinking about images that it is almost everywhere taken as fundamental. It is also, as Sartre suggests, problematical.","PeriodicalId":38858,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iconomy, Iconoclash ≠ Iconomics\",\"authors\":\"T. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/nja.v30i61-62.127897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jean-Paul Sartre’s remark, made in his The Imagination (1936), is used as a prefatory quotation by W.J.T. Mitchell in Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (1986), his classic study of the nature of images and the differences between images and words.1 Like everything else that Mitchell (and Sartre) says about these topics, this gesture is immediately relevant to the issues raised by the questionnaire. Indeed, the first two sentences of the questionnaire set up a relationship between images and imagery, or single images and the overall image flow, that is indeed “traditional,” in fact, ancient, as a presumption, one that is so instinctive to thinking about images that it is almost everywhere taken as fundamental. It is also, as Sartre suggests, problematical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v30i61-62.127897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v30i61-62.127897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

让-保罗·萨特在《想象》(1936)中的这句话,被W.J.T.米切尔在《图像学:图像,文本,意识形态》(1986)中用作引言,这是他对图像本质以及图像与文字之间差异的经典研究就像米切尔(和萨特)关于这些话题所说的其他一切一样,这个手势与问卷所提出的问题直接相关。的确,问卷的前两句话建立了图像与意象之间的关系,或者单个图像与整体图像流之间的关系,这确实是“传统的”,实际上是古老的,作为一种假设,一种对图像的本能思考,几乎无处不在,它被视为基本。正如萨特所言,这也是有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iconomy, Iconoclash ≠ Iconomics
Jean-Paul Sartre’s remark, made in his The Imagination (1936), is used as a prefatory quotation by W.J.T. Mitchell in Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (1986), his classic study of the nature of images and the differences between images and words.1 Like everything else that Mitchell (and Sartre) says about these topics, this gesture is immediately relevant to the issues raised by the questionnaire. Indeed, the first two sentences of the questionnaire set up a relationship between images and imagery, or single images and the overall image flow, that is indeed “traditional,” in fact, ancient, as a presumption, one that is so instinctive to thinking about images that it is almost everywhere taken as fundamental. It is also, as Sartre suggests, problematical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信