促进青少年参与研究:家庭、青少年、酒精和其他药物项目评估原则

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
L. Berends, Horace Wansbrough
{"title":"促进青少年参与研究:家庭、青少年、酒精和其他药物项目评估原则","authors":"L. Berends, Horace Wansbrough","doi":"10.1177/10982140211033653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We developed principles drawn from empowerment and realist evaluation theories to guide a family youth alcohol and drug program evaluation, before reflecting on our experience to develop additional principles for future work. The research team included the program clinician and an independent researcher. A purposive sample of young people and one parent took part in interviews. The principles we applied include practical and transformative elements: a collaborative, multidisciplinary team; valuing client perspectives; diffusing power; the belief that programs aim to achieve positive results; capacity building; and sharing information for personal benefit. Additional principles were having young people on collaborative research teams, addressing organizational readiness to embed young people’s involvement in research, accounting for gatekeepers in recruitment processes, and using information communication technology. While principles should be flexibly applied at project level, they can guide project design and encourage the development of organizational systems that support collaborative inquiry.","PeriodicalId":51449,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Evaluation","volume":"44 1","pages":"394 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling Young People’s Involvement in Research: Principles for a Family Youth Alcohol and Other Drug Program Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"L. Berends, Horace Wansbrough\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10982140211033653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We developed principles drawn from empowerment and realist evaluation theories to guide a family youth alcohol and drug program evaluation, before reflecting on our experience to develop additional principles for future work. The research team included the program clinician and an independent researcher. A purposive sample of young people and one parent took part in interviews. The principles we applied include practical and transformative elements: a collaborative, multidisciplinary team; valuing client perspectives; diffusing power; the belief that programs aim to achieve positive results; capacity building; and sharing information for personal benefit. Additional principles were having young people on collaborative research teams, addressing organizational readiness to embed young people’s involvement in research, accounting for gatekeepers in recruitment processes, and using information communication technology. While principles should be flexibly applied at project level, they can guide project design and encourage the development of organizational systems that support collaborative inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"394 - 405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211033653\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211033653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们制定了从赋权和现实主义评估理论中提取的原则,以指导家庭青少年酒精和毒品项目评估,然后反思我们的经验,为未来的工作制定额外的原则。研究团队包括项目临床医生和一名独立研究员。一个有目的的年轻人和一位家长的样本参加了采访。我们采用的原则包括实践和变革要素:一个协作的多学科团队;重视客户视角;扩散力;相信项目旨在取得积极成果;能力建设;以及为个人利益共享信息。其他原则包括让年轻人加入合作研究团队,解决组织准备让年轻人参与研究的问题,在招聘过程中充当看门人,以及使用信息通信技术。虽然原则应该在项目层面灵活应用,但它们可以指导项目设计,并鼓励开发支持协同调查的组织系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enabling Young People’s Involvement in Research: Principles for a Family Youth Alcohol and Other Drug Program Evaluation
We developed principles drawn from empowerment and realist evaluation theories to guide a family youth alcohol and drug program evaluation, before reflecting on our experience to develop additional principles for future work. The research team included the program clinician and an independent researcher. A purposive sample of young people and one parent took part in interviews. The principles we applied include practical and transformative elements: a collaborative, multidisciplinary team; valuing client perspectives; diffusing power; the belief that programs aim to achieve positive results; capacity building; and sharing information for personal benefit. Additional principles were having young people on collaborative research teams, addressing organizational readiness to embed young people’s involvement in research, accounting for gatekeepers in recruitment processes, and using information communication technology. While principles should be flexibly applied at project level, they can guide project design and encourage the development of organizational systems that support collaborative inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) publishes original papers about the methods, theory, practice, and findings of evaluation. The general goal of AJE is to present the best work in and about evaluation, in order to improve the knowledge base and practice of its readers. Because the field of evaluation is diverse, with different intellectual traditions, approaches to practice, and domains of application, the papers published in AJE will reflect this diversity. Nevertheless, preference is given to papers that are likely to be of interest to a wide range of evaluators and that are written to be accessible to most readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信