应用LI-RADS治疗反应算法(2018版)评价CT和MR在局部-区域消融型肝癌中的价值

IF 0.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
S. Abd-Elsalam, C. Zarad, Waleed Elagawy, B. Hasan, Waleed S. Abo Shanab
{"title":"应用LI-RADS治疗反应算法(2018版)评价CT和MR在局部-区域消融型肝癌中的价值","authors":"S. Abd-Elsalam, C. Zarad, Waleed Elagawy, B. Hasan, Waleed S. Abo Shanab","doi":"10.2174/1573394719666230117111353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe aim of this work is to evaluate the role of multiphasic CT and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using LI-RADS treatment response algorithm (version 2018) and the added values of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in the assessment of loco-Regional ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).\n\n\n\nThis study included 45 patients with 50 loco-Regional ablated HCC lesions. All patients underwent multiphasic CT scan, diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. The reference standards for assessment were based on serum alpha-fetoprotein level and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.\n\n\n\nMulti-phasic CT had moderate sensitivity (87.5%) and high specificity (100%) for assessment of HCC LI-RADS treatment response algorithm. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) for the assessment of HCC LI-RADS treatment response algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of DWI to diagnose HCC malignant residual or recurrence were 93.7% and 100%, respectively, with very good performance. The mean ADC values of the malignant residual or recurrence were significantly lower than that of benign post-ablation tissue changes areas and the best ADC cutoff value for differentiation between viable and nonviable lesions was 1.1x10 ̄³ mm²/s.\n\n\n\nPerformance of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI is better than that of multiphasic CT in the assessment of LIRADS treatment response algorithm. DWI and ADC maps could be used as ancillary methods for differentiation between viable and non-viable loco-regional ablated HCC lesions and should be included in LR-TR treatment response algorithm.\n","PeriodicalId":43754,"journal":{"name":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of CT and MR Imaging in assessment of Loco-Regional ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma using LI-RADS Treatment Response algorithm (version 2018)\",\"authors\":\"S. Abd-Elsalam, C. Zarad, Waleed Elagawy, B. Hasan, Waleed S. Abo Shanab\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573394719666230117111353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe aim of this work is to evaluate the role of multiphasic CT and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using LI-RADS treatment response algorithm (version 2018) and the added values of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in the assessment of loco-Regional ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).\\n\\n\\n\\nThis study included 45 patients with 50 loco-Regional ablated HCC lesions. All patients underwent multiphasic CT scan, diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. The reference standards for assessment were based on serum alpha-fetoprotein level and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.\\n\\n\\n\\nMulti-phasic CT had moderate sensitivity (87.5%) and high specificity (100%) for assessment of HCC LI-RADS treatment response algorithm. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) for the assessment of HCC LI-RADS treatment response algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of DWI to diagnose HCC malignant residual or recurrence were 93.7% and 100%, respectively, with very good performance. The mean ADC values of the malignant residual or recurrence were significantly lower than that of benign post-ablation tissue changes areas and the best ADC cutoff value for differentiation between viable and nonviable lesions was 1.1x10 ̄³ mm²/s.\\n\\n\\n\\nPerformance of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI is better than that of multiphasic CT in the assessment of LIRADS treatment response algorithm. DWI and ADC maps could be used as ancillary methods for differentiation between viable and non-viable loco-regional ablated HCC lesions and should be included in LR-TR treatment response algorithm.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573394719666230117111353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573394719666230117111353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项工作的目的是评估使用LI-RADS治疗反应算法(2018版)的多相CT和动态对比增强MRI以及扩散加权成像(DWI)和表观扩散系数(ADC)图的附加值在评估局部消融肝细胞癌(HCC)中的作用病变。所有患者均接受了多相CT扫描、扩散加权和动态增强MRI检查。评估的参考标准基于血清甲胎蛋白水平和动态对比增强MRI。多相CT对评估HCC LI-RADS治疗反应算法具有中等敏感性(87.5%)和高特异性(100%)。动态对比增强MRI对评估HCC LI-RADS治疗反应算法具有高灵敏度(100%)和特异性(100%)。DWI诊断HCC恶性残留或复发的敏感性和特异性分别为93.7%和100%,具有很好的性能。恶性残留或复发的平均ADC值显著低于良性消融后组织变化区域,区分存活和非存活病变的最佳ADC截止值为1.1x10̄³mm²/s。在评估LIRADS治疗反应算法方面,动态对比增强MRI的性能优于多相CT。DWI和ADC图谱可作为区分活的和不活的局部区域消融HCC病变的辅助方法,并应纳入LR-TR治疗反应算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value of CT and MR Imaging in assessment of Loco-Regional ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma using LI-RADS Treatment Response algorithm (version 2018)
The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of multiphasic CT and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using LI-RADS treatment response algorithm (version 2018) and the added values of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in the assessment of loco-Regional ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). This study included 45 patients with 50 loco-Regional ablated HCC lesions. All patients underwent multiphasic CT scan, diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. The reference standards for assessment were based on serum alpha-fetoprotein level and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Multi-phasic CT had moderate sensitivity (87.5%) and high specificity (100%) for assessment of HCC LI-RADS treatment response algorithm. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) for the assessment of HCC LI-RADS treatment response algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of DWI to diagnose HCC malignant residual or recurrence were 93.7% and 100%, respectively, with very good performance. The mean ADC values of the malignant residual or recurrence were significantly lower than that of benign post-ablation tissue changes areas and the best ADC cutoff value for differentiation between viable and nonviable lesions was 1.1x10 ̄³ mm²/s. Performance of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI is better than that of multiphasic CT in the assessment of LIRADS treatment response algorithm. DWI and ADC maps could be used as ancillary methods for differentiation between viable and non-viable loco-regional ablated HCC lesions and should be included in LR-TR treatment response algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Current Cancer Therapy Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in clinical oncology, cancer therapy and pharmacology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cancer therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信