手术可视化方法的进展:传统显微手术、内窥镜和新型机器人光电可视化工具经鼻蝶窦进入Sellar区域的比较研究

Moisi, C. Fisahn, K. Hoang, P. Buchanan, D. Klinger, Tubbs Rs, Jeni Page, C. Cobbs, D. Backous, J. Delashaw
{"title":"手术可视化方法的进展:传统显微手术、内窥镜和新型机器人光电可视化工具经鼻蝶窦进入Sellar区域的比较研究","authors":"Moisi, C. Fisahn, K. Hoang, P. Buchanan, D. Klinger, Tubbs Rs, Jeni Page, C. Cobbs, D. Backous, J. Delashaw","doi":"10.4172/2325-9701.1000259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the entrance of the video microscope over the recent few years \ninto the microsurgery optical field, a third modality has emerged \nalongside the endoscope and operating microscope to accomplish \nsome of the microsurgical procedures. One such approach \nthat could potentially utilize any of the three is the transnasal \ntranssphenoidal (TNTS) approach that provides access to the \nanterior brainstem, the anterior skull base, and of course the sellar \nregion. Here, we provide a descriptive comparison of the three \nmodalities on cadaveric specimens with joint ENT and neurosurgery \nteams performing the approach. Each provides unique advantages \nand disadvantages as part of the surgeon’s optical armamentarium. \nAs more optical devices become available to surgeons, selection \nof the optimal device can present a challenge best compared by \nhead-to-head comparison. The aim of this paper is to compare \nthese modalities for the TNTS approach.","PeriodicalId":90240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","volume":"2017 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancement of Surgical Visualization Methods: A Comparison Study between Traditional Microscopic Surgery, the Endoscope and a Novel Robotic OptoelectronicVisualization Tool for them Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach to the Sellar Region\",\"authors\":\"Moisi, C. Fisahn, K. Hoang, P. Buchanan, D. Klinger, Tubbs Rs, Jeni Page, C. Cobbs, D. Backous, J. Delashaw\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2325-9701.1000259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the entrance of the video microscope over the recent few years \\ninto the microsurgery optical field, a third modality has emerged \\nalongside the endoscope and operating microscope to accomplish \\nsome of the microsurgical procedures. One such approach \\nthat could potentially utilize any of the three is the transnasal \\ntranssphenoidal (TNTS) approach that provides access to the \\nanterior brainstem, the anterior skull base, and of course the sellar \\nregion. Here, we provide a descriptive comparison of the three \\nmodalities on cadaveric specimens with joint ENT and neurosurgery \\nteams performing the approach. Each provides unique advantages \\nand disadvantages as part of the surgeon’s optical armamentarium. \\nAs more optical devices become available to surgeons, selection \\nof the optimal device can present a challenge best compared by \\nhead-to-head comparison. The aim of this paper is to compare \\nthese modalities for the TNTS approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine & neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine & neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,随着视频显微镜进入显微外科光学领域,除了内窥镜和手术显微镜外,还出现了第三种方式来完成一些显微外科手术。其中一种方法可以利用这三种方法中的任何一种,即经鼻经蝶窦(TNTS)入路它可以进入前脑干,前颅底,当然还有鞍区。在这里,我们提供了一个描述性的比较三种方式在尸体标本与联合耳鼻喉科和神经外科团队执行的方法。作为外科医生光学装备的一部分,每一种都有其独特的优点和缺点。随着越来越多的光学设备可供外科医生使用,选择最佳的设备可能是头对头比较的挑战。本文的目的是比较这些模式的TNTS方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancement of Surgical Visualization Methods: A Comparison Study between Traditional Microscopic Surgery, the Endoscope and a Novel Robotic OptoelectronicVisualization Tool for them Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach to the Sellar Region
With the entrance of the video microscope over the recent few years into the microsurgery optical field, a third modality has emerged alongside the endoscope and operating microscope to accomplish some of the microsurgical procedures. One such approach that could potentially utilize any of the three is the transnasal transsphenoidal (TNTS) approach that provides access to the anterior brainstem, the anterior skull base, and of course the sellar region. Here, we provide a descriptive comparison of the three modalities on cadaveric specimens with joint ENT and neurosurgery teams performing the approach. Each provides unique advantages and disadvantages as part of the surgeon’s optical armamentarium. As more optical devices become available to surgeons, selection of the optimal device can present a challenge best compared by head-to-head comparison. The aim of this paper is to compare these modalities for the TNTS approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信