Moisi, C. Fisahn, K. Hoang, P. Buchanan, D. Klinger, Tubbs Rs, Jeni Page, C. Cobbs, D. Backous, J. Delashaw
{"title":"手术可视化方法的进展:传统显微手术、内窥镜和新型机器人光电可视化工具经鼻蝶窦进入Sellar区域的比较研究","authors":"Moisi, C. Fisahn, K. Hoang, P. Buchanan, D. Klinger, Tubbs Rs, Jeni Page, C. Cobbs, D. Backous, J. Delashaw","doi":"10.4172/2325-9701.1000259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the entrance of the video microscope over the recent few years \ninto the microsurgery optical field, a third modality has emerged \nalongside the endoscope and operating microscope to accomplish \nsome of the microsurgical procedures. One such approach \nthat could potentially utilize any of the three is the transnasal \ntranssphenoidal (TNTS) approach that provides access to the \nanterior brainstem, the anterior skull base, and of course the sellar \nregion. Here, we provide a descriptive comparison of the three \nmodalities on cadaveric specimens with joint ENT and neurosurgery \nteams performing the approach. Each provides unique advantages \nand disadvantages as part of the surgeon’s optical armamentarium. \nAs more optical devices become available to surgeons, selection \nof the optimal device can present a challenge best compared by \nhead-to-head comparison. The aim of this paper is to compare \nthese modalities for the TNTS approach.","PeriodicalId":90240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","volume":"2017 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancement of Surgical Visualization Methods: A Comparison Study between Traditional Microscopic Surgery, the Endoscope and a Novel Robotic OptoelectronicVisualization Tool for them Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach to the Sellar Region\",\"authors\":\"Moisi, C. Fisahn, K. Hoang, P. Buchanan, D. Klinger, Tubbs Rs, Jeni Page, C. Cobbs, D. Backous, J. Delashaw\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2325-9701.1000259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the entrance of the video microscope over the recent few years \\ninto the microsurgery optical field, a third modality has emerged \\nalongside the endoscope and operating microscope to accomplish \\nsome of the microsurgical procedures. One such approach \\nthat could potentially utilize any of the three is the transnasal \\ntranssphenoidal (TNTS) approach that provides access to the \\nanterior brainstem, the anterior skull base, and of course the sellar \\nregion. Here, we provide a descriptive comparison of the three \\nmodalities on cadaveric specimens with joint ENT and neurosurgery \\nteams performing the approach. Each provides unique advantages \\nand disadvantages as part of the surgeon’s optical armamentarium. \\nAs more optical devices become available to surgeons, selection \\nof the optimal device can present a challenge best compared by \\nhead-to-head comparison. The aim of this paper is to compare \\nthese modalities for the TNTS approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine & neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine & neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancement of Surgical Visualization Methods: A Comparison Study between Traditional Microscopic Surgery, the Endoscope and a Novel Robotic OptoelectronicVisualization Tool for them Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach to the Sellar Region
With the entrance of the video microscope over the recent few years
into the microsurgery optical field, a third modality has emerged
alongside the endoscope and operating microscope to accomplish
some of the microsurgical procedures. One such approach
that could potentially utilize any of the three is the transnasal
transsphenoidal (TNTS) approach that provides access to the
anterior brainstem, the anterior skull base, and of course the sellar
region. Here, we provide a descriptive comparison of the three
modalities on cadaveric specimens with joint ENT and neurosurgery
teams performing the approach. Each provides unique advantages
and disadvantages as part of the surgeon’s optical armamentarium.
As more optical devices become available to surgeons, selection
of the optimal device can present a challenge best compared by
head-to-head comparison. The aim of this paper is to compare
these modalities for the TNTS approach.