皇帝、苏丹和城市的故事:比较杜卡斯和莱昂纳多·布鲁尼历史上的主人公

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Matthew Kinloch
{"title":"皇帝、苏丹和城市的故事:比较杜卡斯和莱昂纳多·布鲁尼历史上的主人公","authors":"Matthew Kinloch","doi":"10.1017/byz.2022.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the defining features of the Byzantine historiographical tradition is the dominant narrative roles played by emperors and, in the later period, by Ottoman sultans. This article explores this characteristic feature of the tradition through comparative analysis of the structuring roles occupied by such characters in the fifteenth-century History of Doukas and the protagonistic role of the Florentine people in the contemporary History of the Florentine People by Leonardo Bruni. Transhistorical comparison, organized around two case studies, serves to denaturalize the roles played by emperors and sultans in both Byzantine and modern historiography.","PeriodicalId":43258,"journal":{"name":"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES","volume":"46 1","pages":"196 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stories of emperors, sultans, and cities: comparing protagonists in the histories of Doukas and Leonardo Bruni\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Kinloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/byz.2022.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the defining features of the Byzantine historiographical tradition is the dominant narrative roles played by emperors and, in the later period, by Ottoman sultans. This article explores this characteristic feature of the tradition through comparative analysis of the structuring roles occupied by such characters in the fifteenth-century History of Doukas and the protagonistic role of the Florentine people in the contemporary History of the Florentine People by Leonardo Bruni. Transhistorical comparison, organized around two case studies, serves to denaturalize the roles played by emperors and sultans in both Byzantine and modern historiography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"196 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/byz.2022.4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/byz.2022.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拜占庭史学传统的一个决定性特征是皇帝以及后期奥斯曼苏丹所扮演的主导叙事角色。本文通过对15世纪《杜卡斯史》中这些人物所扮演的结构角色和莱昂纳多·布鲁尼的《佛罗伦萨人史》中佛罗伦萨人的主人公角色的比较分析,探讨了这一传统的特征。围绕两个案例研究组织的跨历史比较,有助于改变皇帝和苏丹在拜占庭和现代史学中所扮演的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stories of emperors, sultans, and cities: comparing protagonists in the histories of Doukas and Leonardo Bruni
One of the defining features of the Byzantine historiographical tradition is the dominant narrative roles played by emperors and, in the later period, by Ottoman sultans. This article explores this characteristic feature of the tradition through comparative analysis of the structuring roles occupied by such characters in the fifteenth-century History of Doukas and the protagonistic role of the Florentine people in the contemporary History of the Florentine People by Leonardo Bruni. Transhistorical comparison, organized around two case studies, serves to denaturalize the roles played by emperors and sultans in both Byzantine and modern historiography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES
BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies is an internationally recognised, peer-reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published twice a year in spring and autumn, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of Byzantine and Modern Greek scholarship, whether historical, literary or social-anthropological. It welcomes research, criticism, contributions on theory and method in the form of articles, critical studies and short notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信