对等租金、监管政策和房东的成本转嫁

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Michelle Müller, Jürgen Neumann, Dennis Kundisch
{"title":"对等租金、监管政策和房东的成本转嫁","authors":"Michelle Müller, Jürgen Neumann, Dennis Kundisch","doi":"10.1080/07421222.2022.2096541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Peer-to-peer (P2P) rental markets have been shown to adversely impact the traditional hospitality industry and housing affordability, fueling the public demand for regulation. While localities around the globe have implemented policies to address these issues, little is known about how rental suppliers respond to those regulations. This study aims to empirically analyze the impact of such policy regulations on the prices charged by different types of rental suppliers. We employed a quasi-experimental research design based on an extensive dataset including more than 50,000 Airbnb listings to uncover the impact of a policy implemented in New Orleans, which introduced annual bring-to-market (BTM) costs through a mandatory licensing system while simultaneously banning listings from one city-center neighborhood. We find that, while non-commercial hosts completely pass their additional costs onto their consumers, irrespectively of demand and supply shifts, commercial hosts’ responses are more nuanced. Those with legalized listings located in the city center only partially pass on their costs to guests, while even decreasing their prices in the rest of the city. Our study contributes to the understanding of pricing in P2P rental markets and its effects. Further, it informs localities and supports policy analytics. With P2P renting remaining attractive in city parts where BTM costs can easily be passed through to consumers, this suggests that these regulatory policies fall short of reducing pressure on housing affordability in the city-center.","PeriodicalId":50154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"39 1","pages":"834 - 864"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer-To-Peer Rentals, Regulatory Policies, And Hosts’ Cost Pass-Throughs\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Müller, Jürgen Neumann, Dennis Kundisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07421222.2022.2096541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Peer-to-peer (P2P) rental markets have been shown to adversely impact the traditional hospitality industry and housing affordability, fueling the public demand for regulation. While localities around the globe have implemented policies to address these issues, little is known about how rental suppliers respond to those regulations. This study aims to empirically analyze the impact of such policy regulations on the prices charged by different types of rental suppliers. We employed a quasi-experimental research design based on an extensive dataset including more than 50,000 Airbnb listings to uncover the impact of a policy implemented in New Orleans, which introduced annual bring-to-market (BTM) costs through a mandatory licensing system while simultaneously banning listings from one city-center neighborhood. We find that, while non-commercial hosts completely pass their additional costs onto their consumers, irrespectively of demand and supply shifts, commercial hosts’ responses are more nuanced. Those with legalized listings located in the city center only partially pass on their costs to guests, while even decreasing their prices in the rest of the city. Our study contributes to the understanding of pricing in P2P rental markets and its effects. Further, it informs localities and supports policy analytics. With P2P renting remaining attractive in city parts where BTM costs can easily be passed through to consumers, this suggests that these regulatory policies fall short of reducing pressure on housing affordability in the city-center.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"834 - 864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2096541\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2096541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:P2P租赁市场已被证明对传统酒店业和住房负担能力产生了不利影响,助长了公众对监管的需求。尽管全球各地都实施了解决这些问题的政策,但对租赁供应商如何应对这些规定知之甚少。本研究旨在实证分析此类政策规定对不同类型租赁供应商收费的影响。我们采用了一种基于广泛数据集的准实验性研究设计,该数据集包括50000多个Airbnb房源,以揭示新奥尔良实施的一项政策的影响,该政策通过强制性许可制度引入了年度上市成本,同时禁止在一个市中心社区上市。我们发现,尽管非商业性主机将其额外成本完全转嫁给消费者,但无论需求和供应变化如何,商业主机的反应都更加微妙。那些位于市中心的合法房源只会将部分成本转嫁给客人,而在城市其他地方甚至会降低价格。我们的研究有助于理解P2P租赁市场的定价及其影响。此外,它还向地方提供信息并支持政策分析。P2P租赁在BTM成本很容易转嫁给消费者的城市地区仍然很有吸引力,这表明这些监管政策未能减轻市中心住房负担能力的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer-To-Peer Rentals, Regulatory Policies, And Hosts’ Cost Pass-Throughs
ABSTRACT Peer-to-peer (P2P) rental markets have been shown to adversely impact the traditional hospitality industry and housing affordability, fueling the public demand for regulation. While localities around the globe have implemented policies to address these issues, little is known about how rental suppliers respond to those regulations. This study aims to empirically analyze the impact of such policy regulations on the prices charged by different types of rental suppliers. We employed a quasi-experimental research design based on an extensive dataset including more than 50,000 Airbnb listings to uncover the impact of a policy implemented in New Orleans, which introduced annual bring-to-market (BTM) costs through a mandatory licensing system while simultaneously banning listings from one city-center neighborhood. We find that, while non-commercial hosts completely pass their additional costs onto their consumers, irrespectively of demand and supply shifts, commercial hosts’ responses are more nuanced. Those with legalized listings located in the city center only partially pass on their costs to guests, while even decreasing their prices in the rest of the city. Our study contributes to the understanding of pricing in P2P rental markets and its effects. Further, it informs localities and supports policy analytics. With P2P renting remaining attractive in city parts where BTM costs can easily be passed through to consumers, this suggests that these regulatory policies fall short of reducing pressure on housing affordability in the city-center.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Management Information Systems
Journal of Management Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Management Information Systems is a widely recognized forum for the presentation of research that advances the practice and understanding of organizational information systems. It serves those investigating new modes of information delivery and the changing landscape of information policy making, as well as practitioners and executives managing the information resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信