社会中的建筑:历史时代的国际研究。

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Lara Band
{"title":"社会中的建筑:历史时代的国际研究。","authors":"Lara Band","doi":"10.1080/00794236.2019.1659651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and literacy as a means of identity-creation and distancing from an author’s origins — Douglass as a former slave, and Yezierska as an immigrant. The final chapter of the book by Benjamin Skolnik, under the section title ‘Coda’, returns to Wye House and the ‘Archaeology in Annapolis’ project, on which much of the archaeology in the book is based. The chapter situates Douglass (and, by extension, the book) in its comparative historical context, as well as a wider intellectual context of post-colonial scholarship. While not concluding the contents of the book in a formulaic way, Skolnik’s chapter provides an appropriate bookend to Leone and Jenkins introduction, synthesizing the archaeological elements of the book in their historical context. This book is occasionally evocative and emotional and is unapologetic about this. The intended readership is undoubtedly academic, but the book is nonetheless pitched to appeal beyond the academy, to a general readership. While the standard of scholarship is very high, the book is well written and easy to read. Students will find the book useful as a detailed comparative study of the transnational history and archaeology of slavery and migration, and as an example of good interdisciplinary practice. Indeed, the bibliographies alone are a valuable resource. A general readership may be more interested in the case studies and sites employed within. For this reason, it is a pity that the volume is so expensive (for example, Amazon sells the book at $72 plus shipping, with no clear UK purchasing option) and difficult to locate easily online. The publishers ought to consider cheaper options for a future edition.","PeriodicalId":43560,"journal":{"name":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","volume":"53 1","pages":"440 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659651","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buildings in Society: International Studies in the Historic Era.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Band\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00794236.2019.1659651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and literacy as a means of identity-creation and distancing from an author’s origins — Douglass as a former slave, and Yezierska as an immigrant. The final chapter of the book by Benjamin Skolnik, under the section title ‘Coda’, returns to Wye House and the ‘Archaeology in Annapolis’ project, on which much of the archaeology in the book is based. The chapter situates Douglass (and, by extension, the book) in its comparative historical context, as well as a wider intellectual context of post-colonial scholarship. While not concluding the contents of the book in a formulaic way, Skolnik’s chapter provides an appropriate bookend to Leone and Jenkins introduction, synthesizing the archaeological elements of the book in their historical context. This book is occasionally evocative and emotional and is unapologetic about this. The intended readership is undoubtedly academic, but the book is nonetheless pitched to appeal beyond the academy, to a general readership. While the standard of scholarship is very high, the book is well written and easy to read. Students will find the book useful as a detailed comparative study of the transnational history and archaeology of slavery and migration, and as an example of good interdisciplinary practice. Indeed, the bibliographies alone are a valuable resource. A general readership may be more interested in the case studies and sites employed within. For this reason, it is a pity that the volume is so expensive (for example, Amazon sells the book at $72 plus shipping, with no clear UK purchasing option) and difficult to locate easily online. The publishers ought to consider cheaper options for a future edition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"440 - 441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659651\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659651\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2019.1659651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

识字是一种身份创造和远离作者出身的手段——道格拉斯是一名前奴隶,叶齐尔斯卡是一名移民。Benjamin Skolnik的这本书的最后一章,标题为“Coda”,回到了怀伊之家和“安纳波利斯考古”项目,书中的大部分考古都是基于该项目。本章将道格拉斯(以及本书)置于其比较历史背景下,以及更广泛的后殖民学术知识背景下。虽然没有以公式化的方式总结本书的内容,但Skolnik的章节为Leone和Jenkins的介绍提供了一个适当的书尾,在他们的历史背景下综合了本书的考古元素。这本书偶尔会引起共鸣和情绪化,并且对此毫不道歉。毫无疑问,这本书的读者群是学术性的,但它的定位是吸引学院以外的普通读者。虽然学术水平很高,但这本书写得很好,读起来很容易。学生们会发现这本书是对奴隶制和移民的跨国历史和考古学的详细比较研究,也是良好的跨学科实践的一个例子。事实上,仅参考书目本身就是一种宝贵的资源。一般读者可能对案例研究和网站更感兴趣。出于这个原因,很遗憾的是,这本书的价格如此昂贵(例如,亚马逊以72美元外加运费的价格出售,没有明确的英国购买选项),而且很难在网上轻松找到。出版商应该为未来的版本考虑更便宜的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Buildings in Society: International Studies in the Historic Era.
and literacy as a means of identity-creation and distancing from an author’s origins — Douglass as a former slave, and Yezierska as an immigrant. The final chapter of the book by Benjamin Skolnik, under the section title ‘Coda’, returns to Wye House and the ‘Archaeology in Annapolis’ project, on which much of the archaeology in the book is based. The chapter situates Douglass (and, by extension, the book) in its comparative historical context, as well as a wider intellectual context of post-colonial scholarship. While not concluding the contents of the book in a formulaic way, Skolnik’s chapter provides an appropriate bookend to Leone and Jenkins introduction, synthesizing the archaeological elements of the book in their historical context. This book is occasionally evocative and emotional and is unapologetic about this. The intended readership is undoubtedly academic, but the book is nonetheless pitched to appeal beyond the academy, to a general readership. While the standard of scholarship is very high, the book is well written and easy to read. Students will find the book useful as a detailed comparative study of the transnational history and archaeology of slavery and migration, and as an example of good interdisciplinary practice. Indeed, the bibliographies alone are a valuable resource. A general readership may be more interested in the case studies and sites employed within. For this reason, it is a pity that the volume is so expensive (for example, Amazon sells the book at $72 plus shipping, with no clear UK purchasing option) and difficult to locate easily online. The publishers ought to consider cheaper options for a future edition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信