衡量诉诸司法的改善:利用A2J衡量框架在加拿大各地进行比较司法数据收集和项目评估

Brea Lowenberger, Heather D. Heavin, Jessica M. McCutcheon, Melissa Nelson
{"title":"衡量诉诸司法的改善:利用A2J衡量框架在加拿大各地进行比较司法数据收集和项目评估","authors":"Brea Lowenberger, Heather D. Heavin, Jessica M. McCutcheon, Melissa Nelson","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving access to justice in Canada’s justice system is often the impetus for introducing new innovations or changing existing systems. However, measuring the effectiveness of these initiatives to improve access to justice is challenging without a common language to help identify and define the elements of access to justice, and without a common framework to help guide the measurement and evaluation of whether improvements are being realized. This paper seeks to contribute to the access to justice measurement discourse by highlighting an access to justice evaluation framework that has been developed with the triple aim objectives of improving population access to justice, improving user experience of access to justice, and improving costs. We also demonstrate how this framework has been used as part of the planning and evaluation of the Listen Project in Saskatchewan, illustrating how this framework can be universally adapted to other projects and initiatives throughout the justice sector.","PeriodicalId":56232,"journal":{"name":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Improvements in Access to Justice: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework for Comparative Justice Data Collection and Program Evaluation Across Canada\",\"authors\":\"Brea Lowenberger, Heather D. Heavin, Jessica M. McCutcheon, Melissa Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improving access to justice in Canada’s justice system is often the impetus for introducing new innovations or changing existing systems. However, measuring the effectiveness of these initiatives to improve access to justice is challenging without a common language to help identify and define the elements of access to justice, and without a common framework to help guide the measurement and evaluation of whether improvements are being realized. This paper seeks to contribute to the access to justice measurement discourse by highlighting an access to justice evaluation framework that has been developed with the triple aim objectives of improving population access to justice, improving user experience of access to justice, and improving costs. We also demonstrate how this framework has been used as part of the planning and evaluation of the Listen Project in Saskatchewan, illustrating how this framework can be universally adapted to other projects and initiatives throughout the justice sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加拿大司法系统中改善诉诸司法的机会往往是引进新的创新或改变现有制度的动力。然而,如果没有一种共同的语言来帮助确定和界定司法求助的要素,并且没有一个共同的框架来帮助指导衡量和评价是否正在实现改善,那么衡量这些改善司法求助的举措的有效性是具有挑战性的。本文旨在通过强调司法公正评估框架,为司法公正衡量话语做出贡献,该框架具有三重目标,即改善人口司法公正,改善司法公正的用户体验,并降低成本。我们还展示了如何将该框架用作萨斯喀彻温省“倾听项目”规划和评估的一部分,说明如何将该框架普遍适用于整个司法部门的其他项目和倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Improvements in Access to Justice: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework for Comparative Justice Data Collection and Program Evaluation Across Canada
Improving access to justice in Canada’s justice system is often the impetus for introducing new innovations or changing existing systems. However, measuring the effectiveness of these initiatives to improve access to justice is challenging without a common language to help identify and define the elements of access to justice, and without a common framework to help guide the measurement and evaluation of whether improvements are being realized. This paper seeks to contribute to the access to justice measurement discourse by highlighting an access to justice evaluation framework that has been developed with the triple aim objectives of improving population access to justice, improving user experience of access to justice, and improving costs. We also demonstrate how this framework has been used as part of the planning and evaluation of the Listen Project in Saskatchewan, illustrating how this framework can be universally adapted to other projects and initiatives throughout the justice sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信