{"title":"贝叶斯系统发育揭示了西藏-**地区跨喜马拉雅语言之间较浅的关系","authors":"Mei-Shin Wu, T. Bodt, Tiago Tresoldi","doi":"10.1075/ltba.21019.wu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently proposed as\n subgroups of the Trans-Himalayan (also known as Tibeto-Burman and Sino-Tibetan) language family. Nonetheless, their internal\n classification, as well as the relation with each other and with other linguistic groups in the family, is hitherto unresolved. We\n use lexical data on these groups and dated phylogenies to investigate such internal classifications. We base our examination on\n previous research into the language family in the Tibet-Arunachal area, and follow a computer-assisted approach of language\n comparison to perform Bayesian phylolinguistic analysis. As earlier phylogenetic studies on this family included little data\n related to this geographic area, we took a subset of the best available dataset and extended it with vocabularies for the Kho-Bwa\n and Hrusish clusters, also including one Mishmic, two Tani, two Tshangla, and five East Bodish languages to cover the major\n languages and linguistic subgroups neighboring these clusters. Our results shed light on the internal and external classification\n of the Kho-Bwa, Hrusish and Bodish languages, and allow us to share valuable experience on the extent to which similar approaches\n can be applied to the phylogenetic analysis of the Trans-Himalayan language family.","PeriodicalId":41542,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian phylogenetics illuminate shallower relationships among Trans-Himalayan languages in the Tibet-Arunachal area\",\"authors\":\"Mei-Shin Wu, T. Bodt, Tiago Tresoldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ltba.21019.wu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently proposed as\\n subgroups of the Trans-Himalayan (also known as Tibeto-Burman and Sino-Tibetan) language family. Nonetheless, their internal\\n classification, as well as the relation with each other and with other linguistic groups in the family, is hitherto unresolved. We\\n use lexical data on these groups and dated phylogenies to investigate such internal classifications. We base our examination on\\n previous research into the language family in the Tibet-Arunachal area, and follow a computer-assisted approach of language\\n comparison to perform Bayesian phylolinguistic analysis. As earlier phylogenetic studies on this family included little data\\n related to this geographic area, we took a subset of the best available dataset and extended it with vocabularies for the Kho-Bwa\\n and Hrusish clusters, also including one Mishmic, two Tani, two Tshangla, and five East Bodish languages to cover the major\\n languages and linguistic subgroups neighboring these clusters. Our results shed light on the internal and external classification\\n of the Kho-Bwa, Hrusish and Bodish languages, and allow us to share valuable experience on the extent to which similar approaches\\n can be applied to the phylogenetic analysis of the Trans-Himalayan language family.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.21019.wu\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.21019.wu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bayesian phylogenetics illuminate shallower relationships among Trans-Himalayan languages in the Tibet-Arunachal area
Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently proposed as
subgroups of the Trans-Himalayan (also known as Tibeto-Burman and Sino-Tibetan) language family. Nonetheless, their internal
classification, as well as the relation with each other and with other linguistic groups in the family, is hitherto unresolved. We
use lexical data on these groups and dated phylogenies to investigate such internal classifications. We base our examination on
previous research into the language family in the Tibet-Arunachal area, and follow a computer-assisted approach of language
comparison to perform Bayesian phylolinguistic analysis. As earlier phylogenetic studies on this family included little data
related to this geographic area, we took a subset of the best available dataset and extended it with vocabularies for the Kho-Bwa
and Hrusish clusters, also including one Mishmic, two Tani, two Tshangla, and five East Bodish languages to cover the major
languages and linguistic subgroups neighboring these clusters. Our results shed light on the internal and external classification
of the Kho-Bwa, Hrusish and Bodish languages, and allow us to share valuable experience on the extent to which similar approaches
can be applied to the phylogenetic analysis of the Trans-Himalayan language family.