促进人权还是提高期望?自主支持对苏格兰人权实现的影响

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Daria Biziewska, George Palattiyil
{"title":"促进人权还是提高期望?自主支持对苏格兰人权实现的影响","authors":"Daria Biziewska, George Palattiyil","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2021.1994370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research investigated Scottish practitioners’ reflections on how local Self-Directed Support (SDS) implementations have affected the realisation of human rights. The findings indicate that SDS increased service users’ awareness of their rights but often in rather abstract ways, with service users (and practitioners) not getting information about SDS-related systems, processes, and procedures needed to make informed choices that support their human rights. The practitioners participating in this study found SDS systems and processes overcomplicated and struggled with accessing information needed for guiding service users. Although there is evidence that some processes are gradually becoming simpler, a focus on controlling resources has created a gap between the human-right-based ethos of SDS and its local implementations, reducing the ability of SDS to promote human rights and, according to some practitioners, just increasing service users’ expectations. This gap might be further widened by insufficient engagement with independent support and advocacy organisations. Points of interests: This article looks at whether Self-Directed Support in Scotland has achieved its aims to promote the rights of people with disabilities. Self-Directed Support is legislation that aims to promote human rights, such as dignity and self-determination, by giving people with disabilities more choice and control over the care they receive. Many practical obstacles make this challenging. This study found that people with disabilities have become more aware of their rights in general, but this often has not translated into getting care in a way that promotes their human rights. This study found that limited resources have meant in practice that local social work departments have focused on how to control their spending on meeting the needs of people with disabilities. This often has meant that the rights of people with disabilities have received less attention and have been neglected.","PeriodicalId":48208,"journal":{"name":"Disability & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"1283 - 1303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting human rights or increasing expectations? Effects of Self-Directed Support on the realisation of human rights in Scotland\",\"authors\":\"Daria Biziewska, George Palattiyil\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09687599.2021.1994370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This research investigated Scottish practitioners’ reflections on how local Self-Directed Support (SDS) implementations have affected the realisation of human rights. The findings indicate that SDS increased service users’ awareness of their rights but often in rather abstract ways, with service users (and practitioners) not getting information about SDS-related systems, processes, and procedures needed to make informed choices that support their human rights. The practitioners participating in this study found SDS systems and processes overcomplicated and struggled with accessing information needed for guiding service users. Although there is evidence that some processes are gradually becoming simpler, a focus on controlling resources has created a gap between the human-right-based ethos of SDS and its local implementations, reducing the ability of SDS to promote human rights and, according to some practitioners, just increasing service users’ expectations. This gap might be further widened by insufficient engagement with independent support and advocacy organisations. Points of interests: This article looks at whether Self-Directed Support in Scotland has achieved its aims to promote the rights of people with disabilities. Self-Directed Support is legislation that aims to promote human rights, such as dignity and self-determination, by giving people with disabilities more choice and control over the care they receive. Many practical obstacles make this challenging. This study found that people with disabilities have become more aware of their rights in general, but this often has not translated into getting care in a way that promotes their human rights. This study found that limited resources have meant in practice that local social work departments have focused on how to control their spending on meeting the needs of people with disabilities. This often has meant that the rights of people with disabilities have received less attention and have been neglected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability & Society\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1283 - 1303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1994370\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1994370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本研究调查了苏格兰从业者对当地自我指导支持(SDS)实施如何影响人权实现的反思。调查结果表明,SDS提高了服务使用者对其权利的认识,但往往是以相当抽象的方式,服务使用者(和从业人员)没有获得做出支持其人权的知情选择所需的与SDS相关的系统、流程和程序的信息。参与本研究的从业人员发现SDS系统和过程过于复杂,难以获取指导服务用户所需的信息。虽然有证据表明,一些程序正在逐渐变得简单,但是,把重点放在控制资源上,已经在SDS的人权精神和它在当地的实施之间造成了差距,降低了SDS促进人权的能力,而且据一些从业人员说,只是增加了服务用户的期望。由于与独立支持和倡导组织的接触不足,这一差距可能会进一步扩大。兴趣点:本文着眼于苏格兰的自我指导支持是否实现了促进残疾人权利的目标。自我指导支持是一项旨在促进人权的立法,如尊严和自决,让残疾人对他们所接受的护理有更多的选择和控制。许多实际障碍使这一目标具有挑战性。这项研究发现,残疾人总体上对自己的权利有了更多的认识,但这往往没有转化为以促进其人权的方式获得照顾。本研究发现,在资源有限的情况下,地方社工部门在实践中关注的是如何控制他们在满足残疾人需求方面的支出。这往往意味着残疾人的权利受到的关注较少,甚至被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting human rights or increasing expectations? Effects of Self-Directed Support on the realisation of human rights in Scotland
Abstract This research investigated Scottish practitioners’ reflections on how local Self-Directed Support (SDS) implementations have affected the realisation of human rights. The findings indicate that SDS increased service users’ awareness of their rights but often in rather abstract ways, with service users (and practitioners) not getting information about SDS-related systems, processes, and procedures needed to make informed choices that support their human rights. The practitioners participating in this study found SDS systems and processes overcomplicated and struggled with accessing information needed for guiding service users. Although there is evidence that some processes are gradually becoming simpler, a focus on controlling resources has created a gap between the human-right-based ethos of SDS and its local implementations, reducing the ability of SDS to promote human rights and, according to some practitioners, just increasing service users’ expectations. This gap might be further widened by insufficient engagement with independent support and advocacy organisations. Points of interests: This article looks at whether Self-Directed Support in Scotland has achieved its aims to promote the rights of people with disabilities. Self-Directed Support is legislation that aims to promote human rights, such as dignity and self-determination, by giving people with disabilities more choice and control over the care they receive. Many practical obstacles make this challenging. This study found that people with disabilities have become more aware of their rights in general, but this often has not translated into getting care in a way that promotes their human rights. This study found that limited resources have meant in practice that local social work departments have focused on how to control their spending on meeting the needs of people with disabilities. This often has meant that the rights of people with disabilities have received less attention and have been neglected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信