非殖民化设计宣言

IF 0.6 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING
D. Abdulla, Ahmed Ansari, Ece Canlı, M. Keshavarz, M. Kiem, P. Oliveira, Luiza Prado, T. Schultz
{"title":"非殖民化设计宣言","authors":"D. Abdulla, Ahmed Ansari, Ece Canlı, M. Keshavarz, M. Kiem, P. Oliveira, Luiza Prado, T. Schultz","doi":"10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of the academic and professional discourse within the design disciplines over the last century has been bereft of a critical reflection on the politics of design practice, and on the politics of the artifacts, systems and practices that designerly activity produces. Our premise is that— notwithstanding important and valued exceptions—design theory, practice, and pedagogy as a whole are not geared towards delivering the kinds of knowledge and understanding that are adequate to addressing longstanding systemic issues of power.\n\nThese issues are products of modernity and its ideologies, regimes, and institutions reiterating, producing and exerting continued colonial power upon the lives of oppressed, marginalised, and subaltern peoples in both the ‘developed’ and ‘developing’ world. This planet, shared and co- inhabited by a plurality of peoples, each inhabiting different worlds, each orienting themselves within and towards their environments in different ways, and with different civilisational histories, is being undermined by a globalised system of power that threatens to flatten and eradicate ontological and epistemological difference, rewriting histories and advance visions of a future for a privileged few at the expense of their human and nonhuman others.","PeriodicalId":44849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"129-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Manifesto for Decolonising Design\",\"authors\":\"D. Abdulla, Ahmed Ansari, Ece Canlı, M. Keshavarz, M. Kiem, P. Oliveira, Luiza Prado, T. Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Much of the academic and professional discourse within the design disciplines over the last century has been bereft of a critical reflection on the politics of design practice, and on the politics of the artifacts, systems and practices that designerly activity produces. Our premise is that— notwithstanding important and valued exceptions—design theory, practice, and pedagogy as a whole are not geared towards delivering the kinds of knowledge and understanding that are adequate to addressing longstanding systemic issues of power.\\n\\nThese issues are products of modernity and its ideologies, regimes, and institutions reiterating, producing and exerting continued colonial power upon the lives of oppressed, marginalised, and subaltern peoples in both the ‘developed’ and ‘developing’ world. This planet, shared and co- inhabited by a plurality of peoples, each inhabiting different worlds, each orienting themselves within and towards their environments in different ways, and with different civilisational histories, is being undermined by a globalised system of power that threatens to flatten and eradicate ontological and epistemological difference, rewriting histories and advance visions of a future for a privileged few at the expense of their human and nonhuman others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Futures Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"129-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Futures Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在上个世纪,设计学科中的许多学术和专业话语都缺乏对设计实践的政治,以及设计师活动产生的人工制品,系统和实践的政治的批判性反思。我们的前提是,尽管有重要和有价值的例外,但设计理论、实践和教学作为一个整体,并不是为了提供足以解决长期系统性权力问题的知识和理解。这些问题是现代性及其意识形态、政权和制度的产物,在“发达”和“发展中”世界中,对被压迫、边缘化和次等人民的生活不断重复、产生和施加殖民权力。这个由多个民族共享和共同居住的星球,每个民族都居住在不同的世界,每个人都以不同的方式在自己的环境中定位自己,并拥有不同的文明历史,正在被全球化的权力体系所破坏,这种权力体系有可能扁平化和根除本体论和认识论的差异,改写历史,并以牺牲人类和非人类其他人为代价,为少数特权阶层推进未来的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Manifesto for Decolonising Design
Much of the academic and professional discourse within the design disciplines over the last century has been bereft of a critical reflection on the politics of design practice, and on the politics of the artifacts, systems and practices that designerly activity produces. Our premise is that— notwithstanding important and valued exceptions—design theory, practice, and pedagogy as a whole are not geared towards delivering the kinds of knowledge and understanding that are adequate to addressing longstanding systemic issues of power. These issues are products of modernity and its ideologies, regimes, and institutions reiterating, producing and exerting continued colonial power upon the lives of oppressed, marginalised, and subaltern peoples in both the ‘developed’ and ‘developing’ world. This planet, shared and co- inhabited by a plurality of peoples, each inhabiting different worlds, each orienting themselves within and towards their environments in different ways, and with different civilisational histories, is being undermined by a globalised system of power that threatens to flatten and eradicate ontological and epistemological difference, rewriting histories and advance visions of a future for a privileged few at the expense of their human and nonhuman others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Futures Studies
Journal of Futures Studies REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Futures Studies is a globally-oriented, trans-disciplinary referred journal. Its mission is to develop high-quality, futures-oriented research and thinking based on the evolving knowledge base of Futures Studies. Articles accepted for publication are expected to show an in-depth understanding of the field"s dimensions, content, research perspectives and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信