为安全联合学习建立互信的多Shuffler框架

IF 7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Zan Zhou, Changqiao Xu, Mingze Wang, Xiaohui Kuang, Yirong Zhuang, Shui Yu
{"title":"为安全联合学习建立互信的多Shuffler框架","authors":"Zan Zhou, Changqiao Xu, Mingze Wang, Xiaohui Kuang, Yirong Zhuang, Shui Yu","doi":"10.1109/TDSC.2022.3215574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Albeit the popularity of federated learning (FL), recently emerging model-inversion and poisoning attacks arouse extensive concerns towards privacy or model integrity, which catalyzes the developments of secure federated learning (SFL) methods. Nonetheless, the collisions between its privacy and integrity, two equally crucial elements in collaborative learning scenarios, are relatively underexplored. Individuals’ wish to “hide in the crowd” for privacy frequently clashes with aggregators’ need to resist abnormal participants for integrity (i.e., the incompatibility between Byzantine robustness and differential privacy). The dilemma prompts researchers to reflect on how to build mutual confidence between individuals and aggregators. Against the backdrop, this paper proposes a multi-shuffler secure federated learning (MSFL) framework, based on which we further propound three modules (hierarchical shuffling mechanism, malice evaluation module, and composite defense strategy) to jointly guarantee strong privacy protection, efficient poisoning resistance, and agile adversary elimination. Extensive experiments on standard datasets exhibited the method's effectiveness in thwarting different FL poisoning attack paradigms with a minimal cost of privacy breaches.","PeriodicalId":13047,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","volume":"20 1","pages":"4230-4244"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multi-Shuffler Framework to Establish Mutual Confidence for Secure Federated Learning\",\"authors\":\"Zan Zhou, Changqiao Xu, Mingze Wang, Xiaohui Kuang, Yirong Zhuang, Shui Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TDSC.2022.3215574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Albeit the popularity of federated learning (FL), recently emerging model-inversion and poisoning attacks arouse extensive concerns towards privacy or model integrity, which catalyzes the developments of secure federated learning (SFL) methods. Nonetheless, the collisions between its privacy and integrity, two equally crucial elements in collaborative learning scenarios, are relatively underexplored. Individuals’ wish to “hide in the crowd” for privacy frequently clashes with aggregators’ need to resist abnormal participants for integrity (i.e., the incompatibility between Byzantine robustness and differential privacy). The dilemma prompts researchers to reflect on how to build mutual confidence between individuals and aggregators. Against the backdrop, this paper proposes a multi-shuffler secure federated learning (MSFL) framework, based on which we further propound three modules (hierarchical shuffling mechanism, malice evaluation module, and composite defense strategy) to jointly guarantee strong privacy protection, efficient poisoning resistance, and agile adversary elimination. Extensive experiments on standard datasets exhibited the method's effectiveness in thwarting different FL poisoning attack paradigms with a minimal cost of privacy breaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"4230-4244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2022.3215574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2022.3215574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

尽管联邦学习(FL)很受欢迎,但最近出现的模型反转和中毒攻击引起了人们对隐私或模型完整性的广泛关注,这催化了安全联邦学习(SFL)方法的发展。尽管如此,它的隐私和完整性这两个在协作学习场景中同样重要的元素之间的冲突却相对未被充分挖掘。个人为了隐私而“躲在人群中”的愿望经常与聚合器为了完整性而抵制异常参与者的需求相冲突(即拜占庭稳健性和差异隐私之间的不兼容性)。这种困境促使研究人员反思如何在个人和聚合者之间建立相互信任。在此背景下,本文提出了一种多洗牌安全联合学习(MSFL)框架,在此基础上,我们进一步提出了三个模块(分层洗牌机制、恶意评估模块和复合防御策略),共同保证强大的隐私保护、高效的防毒和敏捷的对手消除。在标准数据集上进行的大量实验表明,该方法在以最低的隐私泄露成本挫败不同FL中毒攻击模式方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multi-Shuffler Framework to Establish Mutual Confidence for Secure Federated Learning
Albeit the popularity of federated learning (FL), recently emerging model-inversion and poisoning attacks arouse extensive concerns towards privacy or model integrity, which catalyzes the developments of secure federated learning (SFL) methods. Nonetheless, the collisions between its privacy and integrity, two equally crucial elements in collaborative learning scenarios, are relatively underexplored. Individuals’ wish to “hide in the crowd” for privacy frequently clashes with aggregators’ need to resist abnormal participants for integrity (i.e., the incompatibility between Byzantine robustness and differential privacy). The dilemma prompts researchers to reflect on how to build mutual confidence between individuals and aggregators. Against the backdrop, this paper proposes a multi-shuffler secure federated learning (MSFL) framework, based on which we further propound three modules (hierarchical shuffling mechanism, malice evaluation module, and composite defense strategy) to jointly guarantee strong privacy protection, efficient poisoning resistance, and agile adversary elimination. Extensive experiments on standard datasets exhibited the method's effectiveness in thwarting different FL poisoning attack paradigms with a minimal cost of privacy breaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The "IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (TDSC)" is a prestigious journal that publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research in the field of computer science, specifically targeting the development of dependable and secure computing systems and networks. This journal is dedicated to exploring the fundamental principles, methodologies, and mechanisms that enable the design, modeling, and evaluation of systems that meet the required levels of reliability, security, and performance. The scope of TDSC includes research on measurement, modeling, and simulation techniques that contribute to the understanding and improvement of system performance under various constraints. It also covers the foundations necessary for the joint evaluation, verification, and design of systems that balance performance, security, and dependability. By publishing archival research results, TDSC aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and practitioners working in the areas of cybersecurity, fault tolerance, and system reliability. The journal's focus on cutting-edge research ensures that it remains at the forefront of advancements in the field, promoting the development of technologies that are critical for the functioning of modern, complex systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信