《想象的地图:德川和明治时代的景观与日本身份》作者:丰泽信子(书评)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Robert Goree
{"title":"《想象的地图:德川和明治时代的景观与日本身份》作者:丰泽信子(书评)","authors":"Robert Goree","doi":"10.1353/mni.2022.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"to a certain extent it burdens readers with the work of drawing out larger critical perspectives and meaning. The image of Osaka as a city that was economically crucial in its own right set in opposition to a separate administrative center—a perspective powerfully proposed in the introduction—could, I think, quite effectively have been reiterated and connected to the analyses of individual plays. A more in-depth discussion of how bunraku constructed a perspective toward history and current affairs in the context of particular plays, specifically from the vantage point of Osaka, would have been helpful, especially for readers coming from outside early modern theater studies. I would have been interested, too, to see more discussion on how the various historical and contemporary issues that the authors introduce—international maritime relations, monetary plans adopted at different periods, and intellectual efforts to compile historical knowledge—trickled down to the public, or, conversely, how they were scrutinized by the public. In arguing for a countercultural perspective on bunraku, it seems the authors could have made more of an effort to link political affairs at the highest echelons of society with their everyday effects, and to connect consciousness at the administrative level with public consciousness. Of course, it is often easiest to suggest improvements of this sort when a work raises many new questions and avenues for exploration, and that is certainly the case here. In their very last paragraph, the authors connect bunraku performance to a long tradition of oral narratives while also suggesting a connection with benshi, who provided narration for silent films in the twentieth century, and with voice actors in anime and video games (p. 212). For me, the greatest value of this book lies in the promise it offers of unconventional ways of understanding the theater and in its gestures toward unexplored territories into which bunraku studies can still expand. Japanese Political Theatre in the 18th Century is a carefully researched book that illuminates the importance of various sociohistorical issues and enriches studies of early modern theater, literature, and culture. It is an important contribution, and one that can be integrated well into both undergraduate and graduate classrooms.","PeriodicalId":54069,"journal":{"name":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","volume":"77 1","pages":"135 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaginative Mapping: Landscape and Japanese Identity in the Tokugawa and Meiji Eras by Nobuko Toyosawa (review)\",\"authors\":\"Robert Goree\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mni.2022.0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"to a certain extent it burdens readers with the work of drawing out larger critical perspectives and meaning. The image of Osaka as a city that was economically crucial in its own right set in opposition to a separate administrative center—a perspective powerfully proposed in the introduction—could, I think, quite effectively have been reiterated and connected to the analyses of individual plays. A more in-depth discussion of how bunraku constructed a perspective toward history and current affairs in the context of particular plays, specifically from the vantage point of Osaka, would have been helpful, especially for readers coming from outside early modern theater studies. I would have been interested, too, to see more discussion on how the various historical and contemporary issues that the authors introduce—international maritime relations, monetary plans adopted at different periods, and intellectual efforts to compile historical knowledge—trickled down to the public, or, conversely, how they were scrutinized by the public. In arguing for a countercultural perspective on bunraku, it seems the authors could have made more of an effort to link political affairs at the highest echelons of society with their everyday effects, and to connect consciousness at the administrative level with public consciousness. Of course, it is often easiest to suggest improvements of this sort when a work raises many new questions and avenues for exploration, and that is certainly the case here. In their very last paragraph, the authors connect bunraku performance to a long tradition of oral narratives while also suggesting a connection with benshi, who provided narration for silent films in the twentieth century, and with voice actors in anime and video games (p. 212). For me, the greatest value of this book lies in the promise it offers of unconventional ways of understanding the theater and in its gestures toward unexplored territories into which bunraku studies can still expand. Japanese Political Theatre in the 18th Century is a carefully researched book that illuminates the importance of various sociohistorical issues and enriches studies of early modern theater, literature, and culture. It is an important contribution, and one that can be integrated well into both undergraduate and graduate classrooms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"135 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2022.0032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MONUMENTA NIPPONICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mni.2022.0032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在某种程度上,它给读者带来了更大的批判性视角和意义的负担。我认为,大阪作为一个经济上至关重要的城市的形象,与一个单独的行政中心相对立——这一观点在引言中得到了有力的提出——本可以非常有效地得到重申,并与对个别戏剧的分析相联系。如果能更深入地讨论本乐是如何在特定戏剧的背景下,特别是从大阪的有利位置,构建一种看待历史和时事的视角,那将是有帮助的,尤其是对来自早期现代戏剧研究之外的读者来说。我也很想看到更多关于作者介绍的各种历史和当代问题——国际海事关系、不同时期通过的货币计划以及编纂历史知识的智力努力——是如何渗透到公众中的,或者反过来,它们是如何被公众审视的。在主张从反文化的角度看待本乐时,作者似乎本可以做出更多的努力,将社会最高层的政治事务与其日常影响联系起来,并将行政层面的意识与公众意识联系起来。当然,当一部作品提出了许多新的问题和探索途径时,通常最容易提出这种改进建议,这里当然是这样。在最后一段中,作者将本乐的表演与长期的口头叙事传统联系起来,同时也暗示了与本石的联系,本石在20世纪为无声电影提供叙事,以及与动漫和电子游戏中的配音演员的联系(第212页)。对我来说,这本书最大的价值在于它提供了理解戏剧的非传统方式,以及它对本乐研究仍然可以扩展到的未探索领域的姿态。《18世纪的日本政治戏剧》是一本经过仔细研究的书,阐明了各种社会历史问题的重要性,丰富了对早期现代戏剧、文学和文化的研究。这是一个重要的贡献,可以很好地融入本科生和研究生的课堂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imaginative Mapping: Landscape and Japanese Identity in the Tokugawa and Meiji Eras by Nobuko Toyosawa (review)
to a certain extent it burdens readers with the work of drawing out larger critical perspectives and meaning. The image of Osaka as a city that was economically crucial in its own right set in opposition to a separate administrative center—a perspective powerfully proposed in the introduction—could, I think, quite effectively have been reiterated and connected to the analyses of individual plays. A more in-depth discussion of how bunraku constructed a perspective toward history and current affairs in the context of particular plays, specifically from the vantage point of Osaka, would have been helpful, especially for readers coming from outside early modern theater studies. I would have been interested, too, to see more discussion on how the various historical and contemporary issues that the authors introduce—international maritime relations, monetary plans adopted at different periods, and intellectual efforts to compile historical knowledge—trickled down to the public, or, conversely, how they were scrutinized by the public. In arguing for a countercultural perspective on bunraku, it seems the authors could have made more of an effort to link political affairs at the highest echelons of society with their everyday effects, and to connect consciousness at the administrative level with public consciousness. Of course, it is often easiest to suggest improvements of this sort when a work raises many new questions and avenues for exploration, and that is certainly the case here. In their very last paragraph, the authors connect bunraku performance to a long tradition of oral narratives while also suggesting a connection with benshi, who provided narration for silent films in the twentieth century, and with voice actors in anime and video games (p. 212). For me, the greatest value of this book lies in the promise it offers of unconventional ways of understanding the theater and in its gestures toward unexplored territories into which bunraku studies can still expand. Japanese Political Theatre in the 18th Century is a carefully researched book that illuminates the importance of various sociohistorical issues and enriches studies of early modern theater, literature, and culture. It is an important contribution, and one that can be integrated well into both undergraduate and graduate classrooms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA
MONUMENTA NIPPONICA ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Monumenta Nipponica was founded in 1938 by Sophia University, Tokyo, to provide a common platform for scholars throughout the world to present their research on Japanese culture, history, literature, and society. One of the oldest and most highly regarded English-language journals in the Asian studies field, it is known not only for articles of original scholarship and timely book reviews, but also for authoritative translations of a wide range of Japanese historical and literary sources. Previously published four times a year, since 2008 the journal has appeared semiannually, in May and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信