书写为生物识别:以图形学和击键动力学为例

IF 0.3 4区 文学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Akrish Adhikari
{"title":"书写为生物识别:以图形学和击键动力学为例","authors":"Akrish Adhikari","doi":"10.1353/con.2021.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In this article, I provide a media archaeology of keystroke dynamics, a contemporary biometric that identifies users by their typing patterns. In particular, I compare keystroke dynamics to nineteenth-century graphology by way of Alphonse Bertillon, who argues that each person's handwriting is unique and thus suitable for identification purposes. Though the two biometrics analyze different kinds of writing, I argue that graphology and keystroke dynamics are in three ways permutations of each other: they both assume that writing patterns are \"natural\" and thus immutable; they understand writing as a discrete phenomenon and have similar technical structures; and they are classified as behavioral biometrics that are haunted by the physiological. I suggest that the social and technical similarities between the two biometrics stem from the fact that they both measure and analyze handwriting, a term that describes all kinds of writing involving the hand, including penmanship, typewriting, and keyboarding.","PeriodicalId":55630,"journal":{"name":"Configurations","volume":"29 1","pages":"155 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/con.2021.0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing as Biometric: The Case of Graphology and Keystroke Dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Akrish Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/con.2021.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:In this article, I provide a media archaeology of keystroke dynamics, a contemporary biometric that identifies users by their typing patterns. In particular, I compare keystroke dynamics to nineteenth-century graphology by way of Alphonse Bertillon, who argues that each person's handwriting is unique and thus suitable for identification purposes. Though the two biometrics analyze different kinds of writing, I argue that graphology and keystroke dynamics are in three ways permutations of each other: they both assume that writing patterns are \\\"natural\\\" and thus immutable; they understand writing as a discrete phenomenon and have similar technical structures; and they are classified as behavioral biometrics that are haunted by the physiological. I suggest that the social and technical similarities between the two biometrics stem from the fact that they both measure and analyze handwriting, a term that describes all kinds of writing involving the hand, including penmanship, typewriting, and keyboarding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Configurations\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/con.2021.0010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Configurations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2021.0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Configurations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2021.0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在这篇文章中,我提供了一个击键动力学的媒体考古学,这是一种通过用户的打字模式来识别用户的现代生物特征。特别是,我通过Alphonse Bertillon将击键动力学与19世纪的笔迹学进行了比较,他认为每个人的笔迹都是独特的,因此适合用于识别目的。尽管这两种生物特征分析不同类型的书写,但我认为,笔迹学和击键动力学在三个方面是相互排列的:它们都认为书写模式是“自然的”,因此是不可变的;他们将写作理解为一种离散现象,并具有相似的技术结构;它们被归类为生理学困扰的行为生物特征。我认为,这两种生物特征在社会和技术上的相似之处源于它们都测量和分析笔迹,这个术语描述了涉及手的各种书写,包括书法、打字和键盘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing as Biometric: The Case of Graphology and Keystroke Dynamics
ABSTRACT:In this article, I provide a media archaeology of keystroke dynamics, a contemporary biometric that identifies users by their typing patterns. In particular, I compare keystroke dynamics to nineteenth-century graphology by way of Alphonse Bertillon, who argues that each person's handwriting is unique and thus suitable for identification purposes. Though the two biometrics analyze different kinds of writing, I argue that graphology and keystroke dynamics are in three ways permutations of each other: they both assume that writing patterns are "natural" and thus immutable; they understand writing as a discrete phenomenon and have similar technical structures; and they are classified as behavioral biometrics that are haunted by the physiological. I suggest that the social and technical similarities between the two biometrics stem from the fact that they both measure and analyze handwriting, a term that describes all kinds of writing involving the hand, including penmanship, typewriting, and keyboarding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Configurations
Configurations Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Configurations explores the relations of literature and the arts to the sciences and technology. Founded in 1993, the journal continues to set the stage for transdisciplinary research concerning the interplay between science, technology, and the arts. Configurations is the official publication of the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (SLSA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信