越南海洋生物灾难：台湾母国管辖权的检验案例

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS

Business and Human Rights Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1017/bhj.2022.20

Chia-Yun Po

{"title":"越南海洋生物灾难：台湾母国管辖权的检验案例","authors":"Chia-Yun Po","doi":"10.1017/bhj.2022.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Victims of transnational human rights violations caused by multinational corporations (MNCs) are often confronted with substantial impediments to effective remedies. While justice is de facto unattainable in host state courts, due to weak government or the absence of judicial independence, barriers that prevent victims from litigating in home states are no less insurmountable. Transnational litigation in home states has faced jurisdictional challenges. Defendant corporations have argued that home state courts are not the most appropriate forum to hear a case involving foreign torts.1","PeriodicalId":9399,"journal":{"name":"Business and Human Rights Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"303 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vietnam Marine Life Disaster: A Test Case of a Home State’s Jurisdiction in Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Yun Po\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/bhj.2022.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Victims of transnational human rights violations caused by multinational corporations (MNCs) are often confronted with substantial impediments to effective remedies. While justice is de facto unattainable in host state courts, due to weak government or the absence of judicial independence, barriers that prevent victims from litigating in home states are no less insurmountable. Transnational litigation in home states has faced jurisdictional challenges. Defendant corporations have argued that home state courts are not the most appropriate forum to hear a case involving foreign torts.1\",\"PeriodicalId\":9399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business and Human Rights Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"303 - 310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business and Human Rights Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2022.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business and Human Rights Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2022.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

跨国公司造成的跨国侵犯人权行为的受害者往往在获得有效补救方面遇到重大障碍。虽然由于政府软弱或缺乏司法独立性，东道国法院事实上无法伸张正义，但阻止受害者在本国提起诉讼的障碍也同样不可逾越。母国的跨国诉讼面临管辖权挑战。被告公司辩称，母国法院不是审理涉及外国侵权案件的最合适场所。1

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Vietnam Marine Life Disaster: A Test Case of a Home State’s Jurisdiction in Taiwan

Victims of transnational human rights violations caused by multinational corporations (MNCs) are often confronted with substantial impediments to effective remedies. While justice is de facto unattainable in host state courts, due to weak government or the absence of judicial independence, barriers that prevent victims from litigating in home states are no less insurmountable. Transnational litigation in home states has faced jurisdictional challenges. Defendant corporations have argued that home state courts are not the most appropriate forum to hear a case involving foreign torts.1

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Business and Human Rights Journal LAW-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

13.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Business and Human Rights Journal (BHRJ) provides an authoritative platform for scholarly debate on all issues concerning the intersection of business and human rights in an open, critical and interdisciplinary manner. It seeks to advance the academic discussion on business and human rights as well as promote concern for human rights in business practice. BHRJ strives for the broadest possible scope, authorship and readership. Its scope encompasses interface of any type of business enterprise with human rights, environmental rights, labour rights and the collective rights of vulnerable groups. The Editors welcome theoretical, empirical and policy / reform-oriented perspectives and encourage submissions from academics and practitioners in all global regions and all relevant disciplines. A dialogue beyond academia is fostered as peer-reviewed articles are published alongside shorter ‘Developments in the Field’ items that include policy, legal and regulatory developments, as well as case studies and insight pieces.