居住在社区的老年人跌倒风险评估的群体差异

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION

PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1080/02703181.2021.2002997

Alison Mantel, Estefania Zuluaga, Joanna Keough, Lara Suarez, Nicole T. Dawson

{"title":"居住在社区的老年人跌倒风险评估的群体差异","authors":"Alison Mantel, Estefania Zuluaga, Joanna Keough, Lara Suarez, Nicole T. Dawson","doi":"10.1080/02703181.2021.2002997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims This study aims to examine group differences in performance and self-report measures distinguishing non-, single, and recurrent fallers. Methods Fifty-seven community-dwelling older adults completed cognitive and functional assessments and reported number of falls over 12 months. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) examined differences between non-, single, and recurrent fallers. Results Significant group differences were found on fast and comfortable gait speed (p < .01 and p < .01, respectively), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) (p = .04), 30-Second Chair Stand (30-SCS) (p < .01), and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p < .01). An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to control for MMSE after which the previous outcome measures no longer displayed significance. Conclusions Group differences exist between fallers; further, single fallers may experience a fall differently than other fallers. This sample consisted of healthy older adults yet cognition still played a role, demonstrating that the link between cognition and fall risk is yet to be fully understood.","PeriodicalId":45387,"journal":{"name":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group Differences in Fall Risk Assessment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Alison Mantel, Estefania Zuluaga, Joanna Keough, Lara Suarez, Nicole T. Dawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02703181.2021.2002997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aims This study aims to examine group differences in performance and self-report measures distinguishing non-, single, and recurrent fallers. Methods Fifty-seven community-dwelling older adults completed cognitive and functional assessments and reported number of falls over 12 months. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) examined differences between non-, single, and recurrent fallers. Results Significant group differences were found on fast and comfortable gait speed (p < .01 and p < .01, respectively), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) (p = .04), 30-Second Chair Stand (30-SCS) (p < .01), and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p < .01). An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to control for MMSE after which the previous outcome measures no longer displayed significance. Conclusions Group differences exist between fallers; further, single fallers may experience a fall differently than other fallers. This sample consisted of healthy older adults yet cognition still played a role, demonstrating that the link between cognition and fall risk is yet to be fully understood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703181.2021.2002997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703181.2021.2002997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的本研究旨在检验非跌倒者、单一跌倒者和复发跌倒者在表现和自我报告测量方面的群体差异。方法57名居住在社区的老年人完成了认知和功能评估，并报告了12岁以上的跌倒次数月。单因素方差分析（ANOVA）检验了非、单一和复发性跌倒者之间的差异。结果在快速和舒适步态速度（分别为p<0.01和p<0.01）、国际跌倒疗效量表（FES-I）（p=0.04）、30秒椅架（30-SCS）（p<0.01）、，和简易精神状态检查（MMSE）（p<0.01）。协方差分析（ANCOVA）用于控制MMSE，之后先前的结果测量不再显示显著性。结论跌倒者存在群体差异；此外，单个下跌者可能会经历与其他下跌者不同的下跌。该样本由健康的老年人组成，但认知仍然发挥着作用，表明认知与跌倒风险之间的联系尚待充分理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Group Differences in Fall Risk Assessment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Abstract Aims This study aims to examine group differences in performance and self-report measures distinguishing non-, single, and recurrent fallers. Methods Fifty-seven community-dwelling older adults completed cognitive and functional assessments and reported number of falls over 12 months. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) examined differences between non-, single, and recurrent fallers. Results Significant group differences were found on fast and comfortable gait speed (p < .01 and p < .01, respectively), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) (p = .04), 30-Second Chair Stand (30-SCS) (p < .01), and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p < .01). An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to control for MMSE after which the previous outcome measures no longer displayed significance. Conclusions Group differences exist between fallers; further, single fallers may experience a fall differently than other fallers. This sample consisted of healthy older adults yet cognition still played a role, demonstrating that the link between cognition and fall risk is yet to be fully understood.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS REHABILITATION-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This comprehensive journal is recognized for its useful balance of research and clinical practice articles. For more than twenty five years Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics has functioned as a forum for allied health professionals as well as others with a focus on rehabilitation of the geriatric client to share information, clinical experience, research, and therapeutic practice. Each issue focuses on current practice and emerging issues in the care of the older client, including rehabilitation and long-term care in institutional and community settings, and innovative programming; the entire range of problems experienced by the elderly; and the current skills needed for working with older clients.