健康饮食意识、知识、态度和自我效能感在线问卷用于营养教育和推广的有效性和可靠性

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Milflor S. Gonzales, Idelia G. Glorioso, C. Navarro, Theresa Krista B. Jolejole
{"title":"健康饮食意识、知识、态度和自我效能感在线问卷用于营养教育和推广的有效性和可靠性","authors":"Milflor S. Gonzales, Idelia G. Glorioso, C. Navarro, Theresa Krista B. Jolejole","doi":"10.31246/mjn-2021-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study entailed the process of developing an online questionnaire to determine awareness, knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy (AKAS) on healthy eating for nutrition education. Currently, there is no local validated questionnaire that can be used to assess AKAS on healthy eating among Filipino adults. Methods: The study developed the questionnaire based on theoretical frameworks and literature review. The draft questionnaire underwent three stages of development: (1) online modified Delphi technique composing of seven subject matter experts (SME) for content validity; (2) online cognitive debriefing with 32 participants (14 nutrition experts and 18 general public) for construct validity; and (3) online pre-testing with 35 participants (non-nutritionists) using test-retest method. Results: For first stage, the questionnaire contained 16 questions for awareness, 17 questions for knowledge, 17 questions for attitude, and 15 questions for self-efficacy. For second stage, significantly different scores (p-value<0.00) between nutritionist experts and general public were observed, showing good construct validity. For third stage, Spearman’s correlation of test-retest method was 0.640. The questionnaire yielded Cronbach’s alpha of 0.467 to 0.923 (round 1) and 0.435 to 0.923 (round 2). A second analysis was done to improve the internal consistency of the questionnaire. By combining two question categories (awareness and knowledge), the Cronbach’s alpha increased to 0.659 (round 2), and by deleting three questions in attitude category, the Cronbach’s alpha improved to 0.626 (round 2). Conclusion: The process used ensured the questionnaire’s validity and reliability. Hence, this online questionnaire may be adopted by parties interested in developing and assessing nutrition education","PeriodicalId":18207,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of online questionnaire on awareness, knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy (AKAS) on healthy eating for nutrition education and promotion\",\"authors\":\"Milflor S. Gonzales, Idelia G. Glorioso, C. Navarro, Theresa Krista B. Jolejole\",\"doi\":\"10.31246/mjn-2021-0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study entailed the process of developing an online questionnaire to determine awareness, knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy (AKAS) on healthy eating for nutrition education. Currently, there is no local validated questionnaire that can be used to assess AKAS on healthy eating among Filipino adults. Methods: The study developed the questionnaire based on theoretical frameworks and literature review. The draft questionnaire underwent three stages of development: (1) online modified Delphi technique composing of seven subject matter experts (SME) for content validity; (2) online cognitive debriefing with 32 participants (14 nutrition experts and 18 general public) for construct validity; and (3) online pre-testing with 35 participants (non-nutritionists) using test-retest method. Results: For first stage, the questionnaire contained 16 questions for awareness, 17 questions for knowledge, 17 questions for attitude, and 15 questions for self-efficacy. For second stage, significantly different scores (p-value<0.00) between nutritionist experts and general public were observed, showing good construct validity. For third stage, Spearman’s correlation of test-retest method was 0.640. The questionnaire yielded Cronbach’s alpha of 0.467 to 0.923 (round 1) and 0.435 to 0.923 (round 2). A second analysis was done to improve the internal consistency of the questionnaire. By combining two question categories (awareness and knowledge), the Cronbach’s alpha increased to 0.659 (round 2), and by deleting three questions in attitude category, the Cronbach’s alpha improved to 0.626 (round 2). Conclusion: The process used ensured the questionnaire’s validity and reliability. Hence, this online questionnaire may be adopted by parties interested in developing and assessing nutrition education\",\"PeriodicalId\":18207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31246/mjn-2021-0099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31246/mjn-2021-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究涉及开发一份在线问卷的过程,以确定营养教育中健康饮食的意识、知识、态度和自我效能(AKAS)。目前,没有经过当地验证的问卷可用于评估菲律宾成年人健康饮食方面的AKAS。方法:本研究在理论框架和文献综述的基础上编制了调查问卷。问卷草案经历了三个发展阶段:(1)由七位主题专家组成的在线修改德尔菲技术,用于内容有效性;(2) 32名参与者(14名营养专家和18名普通公众)的在线认知汇报,用于结构有效性;以及(3)使用重测方法对35名参与者(非营养师)进行在线预测。结果:在第一阶段,问卷包含16个意识问题、17个知识问题、17种态度问题和15个自我效能问题。在第二阶段,营养学家专家和公众之间的得分显著不同(p值<0.00),显示出良好的结构有效性。对于第三阶段,重新测试方法的Spearman相关性为0.640。问卷得出的Cronbachα为0.467至0.923(第1轮)和0.435至0.923。进行了第二次分析,以提高问卷的内部一致性。通过合并两个问题类别(意识和知识),Cronbach的阿尔法系数提高到0.659(第2轮),通过删除态度类别中的三个问题,Cronb巴赫的阿尔法系数提升到0.626(第2次)。结论:所采用的过程保证了问卷的有效性和可靠性。因此,有兴趣发展和评估营养教育的各方可以采用这种在线问卷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of online questionnaire on awareness, knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy (AKAS) on healthy eating for nutrition education and promotion
Introduction: This study entailed the process of developing an online questionnaire to determine awareness, knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy (AKAS) on healthy eating for nutrition education. Currently, there is no local validated questionnaire that can be used to assess AKAS on healthy eating among Filipino adults. Methods: The study developed the questionnaire based on theoretical frameworks and literature review. The draft questionnaire underwent three stages of development: (1) online modified Delphi technique composing of seven subject matter experts (SME) for content validity; (2) online cognitive debriefing with 32 participants (14 nutrition experts and 18 general public) for construct validity; and (3) online pre-testing with 35 participants (non-nutritionists) using test-retest method. Results: For first stage, the questionnaire contained 16 questions for awareness, 17 questions for knowledge, 17 questions for attitude, and 15 questions for self-efficacy. For second stage, significantly different scores (p-value<0.00) between nutritionist experts and general public were observed, showing good construct validity. For third stage, Spearman’s correlation of test-retest method was 0.640. The questionnaire yielded Cronbach’s alpha of 0.467 to 0.923 (round 1) and 0.435 to 0.923 (round 2). A second analysis was done to improve the internal consistency of the questionnaire. By combining two question categories (awareness and knowledge), the Cronbach’s alpha increased to 0.659 (round 2), and by deleting three questions in attitude category, the Cronbach’s alpha improved to 0.626 (round 2). Conclusion: The process used ensured the questionnaire’s validity and reliability. Hence, this online questionnaire may be adopted by parties interested in developing and assessing nutrition education
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信