为什么开放政府数据计划未能实现其目标:通过全球调查对障碍进行分类和优先排序

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Anneke Zuiderwijk, M. D. Reuver
{"title":"为什么开放政府数据计划未能实现其目标:通过全球调查对障碍进行分类和优先排序","authors":"Anneke Zuiderwijk, M. D. Reuver","doi":"10.1108/TG-09-2020-0271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nExisting overviews of barriers for openly sharing and using government data are often conceptual or based on a limited number of cases. Furthermore, it is unclear what categories of barriers are most obstructive for attaining open data objectives. This paper aims to categorize and prioritize barriers for openly sharing and using government data based on many existing Open Government Data Initiatives (OGDIs).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study analyzes 171 survey responses concerning existing OGDIs worldwide.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found that the most critical OGDI barrier categories concern (in order of most to least critical): functionality and support; inclusiveness; economy, policy and process; data interpretation; data quality and resources; legislation and access; and sustainability. Policymakers should prioritize solving functionality and support barriers and inclusiveness barriers because the authors found that these are the most obstructive in attaining OGDI objectives.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe prioritization of open data barriers calls for three main actions by practitioners to reduce the barrier impact: open data portal developers should develop advanced tools to support data search, analysis, visualization, interpretation and interaction; open data experts and teachers should train potential users, and especially those currently excluded from OGDIs because of a lack of digital skills; and government agencies that provide open data should put user-centered design and the user experience central to better support open data users.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the open data literature by proposing a new, empirically based barrier categorization and prioritization based a large number of existing OGDIs.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why open government data initiatives fail to achieve their objectives: categorizing and prioritizing barriers through a global survey\",\"authors\":\"Anneke Zuiderwijk, M. D. Reuver\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/TG-09-2020-0271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nExisting overviews of barriers for openly sharing and using government data are often conceptual or based on a limited number of cases. Furthermore, it is unclear what categories of barriers are most obstructive for attaining open data objectives. This paper aims to categorize and prioritize barriers for openly sharing and using government data based on many existing Open Government Data Initiatives (OGDIs).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study analyzes 171 survey responses concerning existing OGDIs worldwide.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe authors found that the most critical OGDI barrier categories concern (in order of most to least critical): functionality and support; inclusiveness; economy, policy and process; data interpretation; data quality and resources; legislation and access; and sustainability. Policymakers should prioritize solving functionality and support barriers and inclusiveness barriers because the authors found that these are the most obstructive in attaining OGDI objectives.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe prioritization of open data barriers calls for three main actions by practitioners to reduce the barrier impact: open data portal developers should develop advanced tools to support data search, analysis, visualization, interpretation and interaction; open data experts and teachers should train potential users, and especially those currently excluded from OGDIs because of a lack of digital skills; and government agencies that provide open data should put user-centered design and the user experience central to better support open data users.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study contributes to the open data literature by proposing a new, empirically based barrier categorization and prioritization based a large number of existing OGDIs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2020-0271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2020-0271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的对公开分享和使用政府数据的障碍的现有概述往往是概念性的或基于有限数量的案例。此外,尚不清楚哪些类别的障碍对实现开放数据目标最具阻碍作用。本文旨在根据许多现有的开放政府数据倡议(OGDIs),对公开共享和使用政府数据的障碍进行分类和优先排序。本研究分析了171项关于全球现有ogdi的调查反馈。作者发现最关键的OGDI障碍类别关注(按最重要到最不重要的顺序):功能和支持;包容;经济、政策和过程;数据解释;数据质量和资源;立法和准入;和可持续性。决策者应该优先解决功能和支持障碍以及包容性障碍,因为作者发现这些障碍是实现OGDI目标的最大障碍。实践意义开放数据障碍的优先级要求从业者采取三个主要行动来减少障碍的影响:开放数据门户开发者应该开发先进的工具来支持数据搜索、分析、可视化、解释和交互;开放数据专家和教师应该培训潜在用户,特别是那些由于缺乏数字技能而目前被排除在ogdi之外的用户;提供开放数据的政府机构应该把以用户为中心的设计和用户体验放在中心位置,以更好地支持开放数据用户。原创性/价值本研究提出了一种新的、基于经验的屏障分类和基于大量现有ogdi的优先级,为开放数据文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why open government data initiatives fail to achieve their objectives: categorizing and prioritizing barriers through a global survey
Purpose Existing overviews of barriers for openly sharing and using government data are often conceptual or based on a limited number of cases. Furthermore, it is unclear what categories of barriers are most obstructive for attaining open data objectives. This paper aims to categorize and prioritize barriers for openly sharing and using government data based on many existing Open Government Data Initiatives (OGDIs). Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes 171 survey responses concerning existing OGDIs worldwide. Findings The authors found that the most critical OGDI barrier categories concern (in order of most to least critical): functionality and support; inclusiveness; economy, policy and process; data interpretation; data quality and resources; legislation and access; and sustainability. Policymakers should prioritize solving functionality and support barriers and inclusiveness barriers because the authors found that these are the most obstructive in attaining OGDI objectives. Practical implications The prioritization of open data barriers calls for three main actions by practitioners to reduce the barrier impact: open data portal developers should develop advanced tools to support data search, analysis, visualization, interpretation and interaction; open data experts and teachers should train potential users, and especially those currently excluded from OGDIs because of a lack of digital skills; and government agencies that provide open data should put user-centered design and the user experience central to better support open data users. Originality/value This study contributes to the open data literature by proposing a new, empirically based barrier categorization and prioritization based a large number of existing OGDIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信