19世纪美国激进主义修辞学

IF 0.7 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Patrick Morgan
{"title":"19世纪美国激进主义修辞学","authors":"Patrick Morgan","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2021.1961190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"rhetoric scholars can recognize how violence is more than direct violence and how it inheres in ostensibly nonviolent actions and institutions. By taking note of how this violence, through its circulation, accretes to identities, institutions, and discourses, we may be able to reroute these violent rhetorical ecologies and disrupt the legacy of violence by rhetorically addressing “which responses were available, to whom, and why,” and how “existing responses strain those boundaries” (149). These questions leveled toward violence, Eatman contends, open up new possibilities for how rhetoric may work with, in order to mitigate, violence in its many multimodal, circulating forms.","PeriodicalId":44627,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"427 - 429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nineteenth-Century American Activist Rhetorics\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07350198.2021.1961190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"rhetoric scholars can recognize how violence is more than direct violence and how it inheres in ostensibly nonviolent actions and institutions. By taking note of how this violence, through its circulation, accretes to identities, institutions, and discourses, we may be able to reroute these violent rhetorical ecologies and disrupt the legacy of violence by rhetorically addressing “which responses were available, to whom, and why,” and how “existing responses strain those boundaries” (149). These questions leveled toward violence, Eatman contends, open up new possibilities for how rhetoric may work with, in order to mitigate, violence in its many multimodal, circulating forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhetoric Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"427 - 429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhetoric Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2021.1961190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2021.1961190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

修辞学学者可以认识到暴力不仅仅是直接的暴力,它是如何在表面上的非暴力行动和制度中根深蒂固的。通过注意到这种暴力是如何通过其传播而增加到身份、制度和话语中的,我们可能能够通过修辞解决“哪些回应是可用的,对谁和为什么”以及“现有回应如何突破这些界限”来改变这些暴力修辞生态,并破坏暴力的遗产(149)。Eatman认为,这些针对暴力的问题为修辞如何与多种形式的、流传的暴力合作以减轻暴力开辟了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nineteenth-Century American Activist Rhetorics
rhetoric scholars can recognize how violence is more than direct violence and how it inheres in ostensibly nonviolent actions and institutions. By taking note of how this violence, through its circulation, accretes to identities, institutions, and discourses, we may be able to reroute these violent rhetorical ecologies and disrupt the legacy of violence by rhetorically addressing “which responses were available, to whom, and why,” and how “existing responses strain those boundaries” (149). These questions leveled toward violence, Eatman contends, open up new possibilities for how rhetoric may work with, in order to mitigate, violence in its many multimodal, circulating forms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhetoric Review
Rhetoric Review Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Rhetoric Review (RR), a scholarly interdisciplinary journal of rhetoric, publishes in all areas of rhetoric and writing and provides a professional forum for its readers to consider and discuss current topics and issues. The journal publishes manuscripts that explore the breadth and depth of the discipline, including history, theory, writing, praxis, philosophy, professional writing, rhetorical criticism, cultural studies, multiple literacies, technology, literature, public address, graduate education, and professional issues. Rhetoric Review also invites readers to contribute to the Burkean Parlor, a discourse forum for discussion of Rhetoric Review"s published articles, as well as professional issues. Essay reviews, commissioned by the editor, are included as a regular feature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信