Judith Richter, Charalampos Alexopoulos, Bernhard Weigand
{"title":"加速、跨声速尾流中的粒子图像测速","authors":"Judith Richter, Charalampos Alexopoulos, Bernhard Weigand","doi":"10.1007/s10494-022-00339-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reports on particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements in compressible accelerated wake flows generated by two different central injector types, which are mounted in a convergent-divergent nozzle. The injectors differ by the extent of their trailing edge located either in the subsonic (injector A) or supersonic flow region (injector B). In addition, the undisturbed nozzle flow without injector is studied as a reference case. The PIV results reveal typical wake flow structures expected in subsonic (injector A) and supersonic (injector B) wake flows. They further show that the Reynolds stresses <span>\\(\\mathrm {Re_{xx}}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\mathrm {Re_{yy}}\\)</span> significantly decay in all three cases due to the strong acceleration throughout the nozzle. Interestingly, in the case of injector A, the flow stays non-isotropic with <span>\\(\\mathrm {Re_{yy}}>\\mathrm {Re_{xx}}\\)</span> also far downstream in the supersonic flow region. These measurements were motivated by the lack of velocity data needed to validate numerical simulations. That is why this paper additionally contains results from (unsteady) Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes ((U)RANS) simulations of the two wake flows investigated experimentally. The URANS simulation of the injector A case is able to accurately predict the entire flow field and periodic fluctuations at the wake centerline. However, in the case of injector B, the RANS simulation underestimates the far wake centerline velocity by about <span>\\(4\\%\\)</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"109 3","pages":"667 - 696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-022-00339-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Accelerated, Transonic Wake Flows\",\"authors\":\"Judith Richter, Charalampos Alexopoulos, Bernhard Weigand\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10494-022-00339-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper reports on particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements in compressible accelerated wake flows generated by two different central injector types, which are mounted in a convergent-divergent nozzle. The injectors differ by the extent of their trailing edge located either in the subsonic (injector A) or supersonic flow region (injector B). In addition, the undisturbed nozzle flow without injector is studied as a reference case. The PIV results reveal typical wake flow structures expected in subsonic (injector A) and supersonic (injector B) wake flows. They further show that the Reynolds stresses <span>\\\\(\\\\mathrm {Re_{xx}}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(\\\\mathrm {Re_{yy}}\\\\)</span> significantly decay in all three cases due to the strong acceleration throughout the nozzle. Interestingly, in the case of injector A, the flow stays non-isotropic with <span>\\\\(\\\\mathrm {Re_{yy}}>\\\\mathrm {Re_{xx}}\\\\)</span> also far downstream in the supersonic flow region. These measurements were motivated by the lack of velocity data needed to validate numerical simulations. That is why this paper additionally contains results from (unsteady) Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes ((U)RANS) simulations of the two wake flows investigated experimentally. The URANS simulation of the injector A case is able to accurately predict the entire flow field and periodic fluctuations at the wake centerline. However, in the case of injector B, the RANS simulation underestimates the far wake centerline velocity by about <span>\\\\(4\\\\%\\\\)</span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"volume\":\"109 3\",\"pages\":\"667 - 696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-022-00339-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-022-00339-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-022-00339-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Accelerated, Transonic Wake Flows
This paper reports on particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements in compressible accelerated wake flows generated by two different central injector types, which are mounted in a convergent-divergent nozzle. The injectors differ by the extent of their trailing edge located either in the subsonic (injector A) or supersonic flow region (injector B). In addition, the undisturbed nozzle flow without injector is studied as a reference case. The PIV results reveal typical wake flow structures expected in subsonic (injector A) and supersonic (injector B) wake flows. They further show that the Reynolds stresses \(\mathrm {Re_{xx}}\) and \(\mathrm {Re_{yy}}\) significantly decay in all three cases due to the strong acceleration throughout the nozzle. Interestingly, in the case of injector A, the flow stays non-isotropic with \(\mathrm {Re_{yy}}>\mathrm {Re_{xx}}\) also far downstream in the supersonic flow region. These measurements were motivated by the lack of velocity data needed to validate numerical simulations. That is why this paper additionally contains results from (unsteady) Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes ((U)RANS) simulations of the two wake flows investigated experimentally. The URANS simulation of the injector A case is able to accurately predict the entire flow field and periodic fluctuations at the wake centerline. However, in the case of injector B, the RANS simulation underestimates the far wake centerline velocity by about \(4\%\).
期刊介绍:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles.
Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.